Literature DB >> 25477302

Tissue engineering in urothelium regeneration.

Martin Vaegler1, Sabine Maurer1, Patricia Toomey2, Bastian Amend3, Karl-Dietrich Sievert4.   

Abstract

The development of therapeutic treatments to regenerate urothelium, manufacture tissue equivalents or neourethras for in-vivo application is a significant challenge in the field of tissue engineering. Many studies have focused on urethral defects that, in most cases, inadequately address current therapies. This article reviews the primary tissue engineering strategies aimed at the clinical requirements for urothelium regeneration while concentrating on promising investigations in the use of grafts, cellular preparations, as well as seeded or unseeded natural and synthetic materials. Despite significant progress being made in the development of scaffolds and matrices, buccal mucosa transplants have not been replaced. Recently, graft tissues appear to have an advantage over the use of matrices. These therapies depend on cell isolation and propagation in vitro that require, not only substantial laboratory resources, but also subsequent surgical implant procedures. The choice of the correct cell source is crucial when determining an in-vivo application because of the risks of tissue changes and abnormalities that may result in donor site morbidity. Addressing an appropriately-designed animal model and relevant regulatory issues is of fundamental importance for the principal investigators when a therapy using cellular components has been developed for clinical use.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell regeneration; Personalized medicine; Regenerative medicine; Smooth muscle cells; Stem cells; Tissue engineering; Urology; Urothelium

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25477302     DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev        ISSN: 0169-409X            Impact factor:   15.470


  7 in total

1.  Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: bench to bedside in urology. Preface.

Authors:  Margot S Damaser; Karl-Dietrich Sievert
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  A biomimetic hyaluronic acid-silk fibroin nanofiber scaffold promoting regeneration of transected urothelium.

Authors:  Yuqing Niu; Massimiliano Galluzzi; Fuming Deng; Zhang Zhao; Ming Fu; Liang Su; Weitang Sun; Wei Jia; Huimin Xia
Journal:  Bioeng Transl Med       Date:  2021-11-18

Review 3.  Current Status of Tissue Engineering in the Management of Severe Hypospadias.

Authors:  Tariq O Abbas; Elsadig Mahdi; Anwarul Hasan; Abdulla AlAnsari; Cristian Pablo Pennisi
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 4.  Biofabrication and biomaterials for urinary tract reconstruction.

Authors:  Moustafa M Elsawy; Achala de Mel
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2017-05-10

Review 5.  Regenerative Medicine of Epithelia: Lessons From the Past and Future Goals.

Authors:  Eleonora Maurizi; Davide Adamo; Federica Maria Magrelli; Giulia Galaverni; Eustachio Attico; Alessia Merra; Maria Benedetta Rizzarda Maffezzoni; Lorena Losi; Vincenzo Giuseppe Genna; Virginia Sceberras; Graziella Pellegrini
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-03-25

6.  Application of antibody-conjugated small intestine submucosa to capture urine-derived stem cells for bladder repair in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Yu-Ting Song; Yan-Qing Li; Mao-Xuan Tian; Jun-Gen Hu; Xiu-Ru Zhang; Peng-Cheng Liu; Xiu-Zhen Zhang; Qing-Yi Zhang; Li Zhou; Long-Mei Zhao; Jesse Li-Ling; Hui-Qi Xie
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-11-27

Review 7.  Urine-Derived Stem Cells for Epithelial Tissues Reconstruction and Wound Healing.

Authors:  Xiya Yin; Qingfeng Li; Patrick Michael McNutt; Yuanyuan Zhang
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 6.525

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.