G Castoria1, P Giovannelli1, M Di Donato1, A Ciociola1, R Hayashi2, F Bernal3, E Appella2, F Auricchio1, A Migliaccio1. 1. Department of Biochemistry, Biophysics and General Pathology-II University of Naples, Via L. De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy. 2. Laboratory of Cell Biology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-4256, USA. 3. Metabolism Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-4256, USA.
Abstract
The functions of androgen receptor (AR) in stromal cells are still debated in spite of the demonstrated importance of these cells in organ development and diseases. Here, we show that physiological androgen concentration (10 nM R1881 or DHT) fails to induce DNA synthesis, while it consistently stimulates cell migration in mesenchymal and transformed mesenchymal cells. Ten nanomolar R1881 triggers p27 Ser10 phosphorylation and its stabilization in NIH3T3 fibroblasts. Activation of Rac and its downstream effector DYRK 1B is responsible for p27 Ser10 phosphorylation and cell quiescence. Ten nanomolar androgen also inhibits transformation induced by oncogenic Ras in NIH3T3 fibroblasts. Overexpression of an AR mutant unable to interact with filamin A, use of a small peptide displacing AR/filamin A interaction, and filamin A knockdown indicate that the androgen-triggered AR/filamin A complex regulates the pathway leading to p27 Ser10 phosphorylation and cell cycle arrest. As the AR/filamin A complex is also responsible for migration stimulated by 10 nM androgen, our report shows that the androgen-triggered AR/filamin A complex controls, through Rac 1, the decision of cells to halt cell cycle and migration. This study reveals a new and unexpected role of androgen/AR signalling in coordinating stromal cell functions.
The functions of androgen receptor (AR) in stromal cells are still debated in spite of the demonstrated importance of these cells in organ development and diseases. Here, we show that physiological androgen concentration (10 nM R1881 or DHT) fails to induce DNA synthesis, while it consistently stimulates cell migration in mesenchymal and transformed mesenchymal cells. Ten nanomolar R1881 triggers p27Ser10 phosphorylation and its stabilization in NIH3T3 fibroblasts. Activation of Rac and its downstream effector DYRK 1B is responsible for p27Ser10 phosphorylation and cell quiescence. Ten nanomolar androgen also inhibits transformation induced by oncogenic Ras in NIH3T3 fibroblasts. Overexpression of an AR mutant unable to interact with filamin A, use of a small peptide displacing AR/filamin A interaction, and filamin A knockdown indicate that the androgen-triggered AR/filamin A complex regulates the pathway leading to p27Ser10 phosphorylation and cell cycle arrest. As the AR/filamin A complex is also responsible for migration stimulated by 10 nM androgen, our report shows that the androgen-triggered AR/filamin A complex controls, through Rac 1, the decision of cells to halt cell cycle and migration. This study reveals a new and unexpected role of androgen/AR signalling in coordinating stromal cell functions.
Androgens stimulate the growth of target cells, but under certain conditions slow
down proliferation depending on cell type and microenvironment.[1] Androgen binding to the androgen receptor (AR)
induces differentiation of normal prostate epithelial cells and proliferation of
transformed prostate epithelial cells.[2]
Additionally, AR-expressing human prostate stromal cells do not respond to androgens
with proliferation.[3, 4]Mesenchymal and transformed mesenchymal cells harbor a transcriptionally incompetent
AR, and their proliferation is insensitive to physiological androgen concentration
(10 nM R1881 or di-hydro-testosterone (DHT)).[5, 6] At this concentration,
these cells undergo migration as a consequence of association between AR and filamin
A (FlnA).6 Androgen behaviors (proliferation/migration
dichotomy) mimic those of growth factors (EGF, VEGF and PDGF), which
trigger motility or proliferation depending on cell type, receptor distribution,
ligand concentration and dynamic regulation of signalling networks.[7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12] The molecular basis
of a cell's decision to ‘go or grow' in response to the
same stimulus is not, however, completely understood.In this study, we analyzed in NIH3T3 cells the dichotomous
(proliferative/migratory) functions of AR and identified the AR/FlnA complex
as the upstream player of the non-proliferative, migratory phenotype.
Androgen/AR signalling initiated by the AR/FlnA complex activates Rac1,
which results in cell quiescence through DYRK 1B action. Stimulation of mesenchymal
cell proliferation by androgens is observed upon AR/FlnA/Rac/DYRK 1B
pathway inhibition, indicating that in these cells, androgens repress the
proliferative circuitry observed in classical epithelial target cells. We now report
that 10 nM androgen activates the FlnA/Rac/DYRK 1B cascade to offset
their growth, promoting action in mesenchymal cells. Findings in Ras-transformed
fibroblasts and humanfibrosarcomaHT1080 cells, harboring an activated
N-Ras,[13] strengthen the role of AR
in lowering the proliferative potential of non-transformed or transformed
mesenchymal cells, and suggest that new approaches are needed for the study and
treatment of AR-related diseases.
Results
Effect of 10 nM androgens on DNA synthesis of primary,
immortalized and transformed fibroblasts
NIH3T3 cells, mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs), primary mouse fibroblasts
(MFs) and humanfibrosarcomaHT1080 cells were used. In contrast to
stimulation with low androgen concentration (1 picomolar; 1 pM),
which has a proliferative action (Figure
1),5 challenging of NIH3T3 cells with 10 nM
of the non-aromatizable agonist R1881 (Figure
1a) or 5α DHT (Figure
1c) very weakly increases BrdU incorporation in several different
experiments. Stimulation of MEFs (Figure 1e),
HT1080 cells (Figure 1f) or MFs (Figures 1g and h) with 10 nM R1881 or DHT
does not affect DNA synthesis. Notably, the anti-androgen bicalutamide (Bic)
increases BrdU incorporation, whereas it very slightly affects BrdU
incorporation when added alone to the cell medium. Thus, Bic does not act on
DNA synthesis by itself, but releases an inhibitory function on cell cycle
progression mediated by the ligand-coupled AR. Similar results are observed
using R1881 or DHT in in vitro cell growth assay in NIH3T3 cells
(Figures 1b and d).
Figure 1
Effect of different concentrations of androgens on DNA synthesis of
mesenchymal cells. Quiescent NIH3T3 cells were used and left untreated or
treated with the indicated compounds. R1881 (Perkin-Elmer) or DHT (Sigma)
were used at 1 pM or 10 nM; bicalutamide (Sigma-Aldrich; Bic)
was added at 1000-fold excess. In (a and c), cells on
coverslips were pulsed with 100 μM BrdU and 18 h
later BrdU incorporation was analyzed by IF. Data were expressed as %
of cells. In (b and d), cell growth was measured 24 h
later by MTT assay and data were expressed as relative increase. Quiescent
mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs in e) or HT1080 cells (f) or
primary mouse fibroblasts (MFs in g and h) on coverslips were
left untreated or treated for 18 h with the indicated concentration
of R1881 or DHT. Bicalutamide was added at 1000-fold excess. BrdU
incorporation was analyzed as above and expressed as % of cells. In
(a–h), means and S.E.M. are shown. n represents
the number of experiments throughout the figures
Ten nanomolar R1881 or DHT significantly increases motility of NIH3T3
fibroblasts (Supplementary Figure 1S A),
MEFs, MFs and HT1080 cells (Supplementary Figure
2S),5,6 and Bic inhibits androgen-induced
migration. Thus, Bic inhibits the migratory capacity of fibroblasts, while
increasing their proliferative rate.NIH3T3 fibroblasts do not express estradiol or progesterone receptor (ER or
PgR; Supplementary Figures 1S B).
Consistently, neither estradiol nor the synthetic progestin R5020 affects
migration (Supplementary Figures 1S A), DNA
synthesis (Supplementary Figures 1S C) or
in vitro growth (Supplementary Figures 1S
D).In sum, 10 nM R1881 or DHT, which induces cell cycle progression in
various AR-expressing epithelial cancer cells,[14] does not drive DNA synthesis in primary,
immortalized and transformed fibroblasts, unless they are treated with
Bic.
Ten nanomolar R1881 triggers p27 Ser10 phosphorylation and
stabilization, inducing quiescence in NIH3T3 fibroblasts
p27 levels are elevated in quiescent cells and decrease upon mitogenic
stimulation.[15] Ten
nanomolar R1881 neither downregulates p27 (Figure
2a) nor allows DNA synthesis in NIH3T3 cells (Figure 2b). In contrast, low R1881 concentration
(1 pM) decreases p27 levels (Figure 2a)
and increases DNA synthesis (Figure 2b). As p27
expression might be transcriptionally regulated,[15] we analyzed the androgen effect on luciferase
reporter construct driven by the p27 promoter. Neither 10 nM nor
1 pM R1881 modifies p27 transcription in gene reporter assay, whereas
serum stimulation of quiescent NIH3T3 fibroblasts increases (about fourfold)
p27 transcription (Supplementary Figures 3S
A). p27 is localized in the nuclei of quiescent cells and is
exported in cytoplasm as the cells progress toward S-phase.[15] Consistently, p27 is detectable in
the cytoplasm of cells treated with the proliferative R1881 concentration
(1 pM), whereas it remains in the nuclei of 10 nM
R1881-treated cells, mimicking the results observed in quiescent cells
(Figure 2c and Supplementary Figure 3S B).
Figure 2
Ten nanomolar R1881-triggered p27 Ser10 phosphorylation induces quiescence.
Quiescent NIH3T3 cells were used. In (a), quiescent cells were
untreated or treated for the indicated times with 10 nM or
1 pM R1881. Lysate proteins were analyzed using anti-p27 (p27)
antibody. Filters were re-probed with the anti-tubulin (tub) Ab, as a
loading control. In (b), cells on coverslips were left untreated or
treated with the indicated concentration of R1881 and pulsed with BrdU. BrdU
incorporation was analyzed as above and expressed as % of cells. In
(c), cells on coverslips were left untreated or treated for the
indicated times with R1881 (10 nM or 1 pM). p27 was stained
and visualized by IF. Cells showing exclusively nuclear p27 were scored and
results expressed as % of cells. Data are derived from at least 600
scored cells for each experiment. In (d), cells were untreated or
treated for the indicated times with 10 nM R1881. Lysate proteins
were analyzed by western blot, using antibodies against the indicated
proteins. In (e), cells were transfected with the empty (ctrl) or wt
p27 or S10A p27 encoding plasmids. Transfected cells on coverslips were made
quiescent and then untreated or treated for 18 h with 10 nM
R1881. After in vivo pulse, BrdU incorporation was analyzed and
expressed as % of transfected cells. Data are derived from at least
200 scored cells for each coverslip. Several coverslips were analyzed from
three independent experiments. Inset in (e) shows the immunoblot of
lysate proteins from cells transfected with control (none) and human p27 (wt
or S10A) encoding plasmids. Lysate proteins were collected at the end of the
experiment, and blotted with the antibodies against the indicated proteins.
In (b, c and e), means and S.E.M. are shown
Posttranslational modifications regulate p27 levels.[16] Ser10 is one of the major phosphorylation sites
of p27.[17, 18] Challenging of quiescent NIH3T3 cells with
10 nM R1881 triggers p27Ser10 phosphorylation, with a peak after
30 min, and slightly affects Thr187 phosphorylation in time-course
experiments (Figure 2d). Quantitative analysis
from three different experiments (Supplementary Figures
3S, C) shows a significant and rapid increase (about 3.5-fold
within 30 min) of p27Ser10 phosphorylation in 10 nM
R1881-stimulated cells.Ser10 phosphorylation stabilizes p27 in G0.[19, 20] Thus, we
hypothesized that p27Ser10 phosphorylation impairs the movement from G0 to
G1-S in cells treated with 10 nM R1881. We therefore transiently
transfected NIH3T3 fibroblasts with an empty plasmid or with a plasmid
encoding for the human wild-type p27 (wt p27) or a mutant of p27 carrying a
substitution of Ser10 with Ala (S10A p27).[17] Both versions of p27 (wt or S10A) are
overexpressed (inset in Figure 2e), with the
humanp27 (wt or S10A) migrating more slowly than endogenous mousep27.[17] Stimulation with
10 nM R1881 significantly increases BrdU incorporation in cells
overexpressing the mutant S10A p27 (right panel in Figure
2e), as compared with cells overexpressing the wt p27 (central
panel in Figure 2e) or the empty (left panel in
Figure 2e) plasmid. Simultaneous analysis of
p27 localization shows that, irrespective of transfected plasmids, p27 is
localized in the nuclei of cells treated for different times (from 0 to
12 h) with 10 nM R1881 (Figures 3a and
b), indicating that Ser10 phosphorylation has a negligible
effect on localization of p27. Some of the nuclei expressing p27S10A are
less bright (Figure 3a), likely because of the
p27 mutant degradation.
Figure 3
Effect of 10 nM R1881 on localization and half-life of p27 in NIH3T3
cells. NIH3T3 cells were transfected with HA-tagged wt or S10A p27. Cells
were made quiescent and then left unstimulated or stimulated for the
indicated times with 10 nM R1881. In (a and b),
overexpressed p27 was visualized by IF as described in Methods. Panel
(a) shows representative images from one experiment in
(b). Bar, 10 μM. Graphs in (b) show the
quantitative score of nuclear p27, wt or S10A, overexpressed in NIH3T3
cells. Several coverslips were analyzed for each experiment, with a score of
at least 100 cells for each coverslip. Means and S.E.M. are shown. In
(c and d), NIH3T3 cells were transfected with HA-tagged wt
p27 or S10A p27 plasmids. Cells were made quiescent and cycloheximide
(50 μg/ml) was added for the last 8 h.
Cells were then left unstimulated or stimulated for the indicated times with
10 nM R1881. The immunoblot of lysate proteins from cells transfected
with wt p27 or S10A p27 encoding plasmids is shown in (c). The level
of transfected p27 normalized to CDK-4 from two different experiments is
shown in (d)
Therefore, we evaluated the half-life of overexpressed p27, wt or S10A in
cycloheximide-treated NIH3T3 cells. Cells were challenged with 10 nM R1881
for the indicated times. Immunoblot and quantitative analysis show that S10A
p27 undergoes a rapid and robust degradation upon R1881 stimulation. In
contrast, the levels of wt p27 are stable (Figures 3c and
d). Cell cycle analysis by fluorescence-activated cell sorting
shows that a large number of 10 nM R1881-treated NIH3T3 fibroblasts
are in G0/G1 (Supplementary Figures 4S
A). Thus, 10 nM R1881 triggers p27Ser 10 phosphorylation,
stabilizes p27 and maintains cell quiescence.
Ten nanomolar R1881 activates DYRK 1B through Rac1
Dual-specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinases (DYRKs) control
proliferation and differentiation through the phosphorylation of cell cycle
regulators.[21] A member of
the DYRK family kinases, DYRK 1B, induces reversible G0 arrest by
stabilizing p27 through Ser10 phosphorylation.[19] In NIH3T3 cells, there are congruent effects on
DNA synthesis, as 10 nM R1881 increases p27Ser10 phosphorylation,
whereas 1 pM R1881 reduces this phosphorylation below the basal level in
lysates (Figure 4a). At the same time, 10 nM
R1881 increases the activity of DYRK 1B (B). In the same experiment, a weak,
but not significant, increase in DNA synthesis was detected in 10 nM
R1881-treated NIH3T3 cells (A). In contrast, 1 pM R1881 concentration
leaves unaffected DYRK 1B activity (panel B) and robustly increases DNA
synthesis (A). No increase in DYRK 1B activity is detected in cell lysates
immunoprecipitated with control antibody (Figure
4b). Quantitative analysis from different experiments shows
that myelin basic protein phosphorylation by immunoprecipitated DYRK 1B
increased by about fivefold upon 10 nM R1881 stimulation of quiescent
cells (legend to Figure 4). Thus, hormonal
activation of DYRK 1B would result in P-p27-Ser10 phosphorylation and cell
quiescence.
Figure 4
Ten nanomolar androgen activation of DYRK 1B induces quiescence through p27
Ser10 phosphorylation and is Rac-dependent. NIH3T3 cells were used. In
(a), quiescent cells were untreated or treated for 30 min
with 10 nM or 1 pM R1881. Lysate proteins were analyzed by
western blot, using antibodies against the indicated proteins (lysates). The
lowest section shows the corresponding BrdU incorporation analyzed by IF and
expressed as % of cells. Means and S.E.M. are shown. In (b),
quiescent cells were untreated or treated for 30 min with
10 nM or 1 pM R1881. Lysate proteins were immunoprecipitated
with control (ctrl) or anti-DYRK 1B antibody. Immune complexes were analyzed
for DYRK 1B activity using myelin basic protein (MBP) as a substrate. DYRK
1B levels in immune complexes were detected by immunoblot with anti-DYRK 1B
antibody. Quantitative analysis of 10 nM R1881-triggered DYRK 1B
activity from three different experiments was analyzed using the NIH Image J
program. It showed a fivefold increase in kinase activity. In contrast, no
significant increase in kinase activity was detected in cells stimulated
with 1 pM R1881. In (c), growing cells were transfected with
non-targeting siRNA (ctrl siRNA) or DYRK 1B siRNA (DYRK 1B siRNA). Cells
were co-transfected with negative control siRNA Alexa-Fluor 488 to help
identification of transfected cells. After transfection, cells were made
quiescent, then left unstimulated or stimulated for 18 h with
10 nM R1881. After in vivo pulse with BrdU, BrdU
incorporation was analyzed by IF and expressed as % of transfected
cells. Data are derived from at least 300 scored cells for each experiment.
Means and S.E.M. are shown. Lysate proteins from cells transfected with
non-targeting (ctrl) or targeting (DYRK 1B) siRNA were analyzed by western
blot with anti-DYRK 1B antibody (left panel in d), and filter was
re-probed with anti-tubulin antibody, as a loading control (tub). DYRK 1B
was immunoprecipitated from the same lysate proteins and its activity in
immune complexes was assayed using MBP as a substrate (right panel in
d). In (e), quiescent cells were left untreated or treated
for 30 min with 10 nM R1881, in the absence or presence of the
DYRK 1B inhibitor AZ191, which was added (1 μM)
15 min before hormonal stimulation. Control cells in right panel were
treated with the inhibitor alone. In left panels, lysate proteins were
immunoprecipitated with anti-DYRK 1B antibody. Immune complexes were
analyzed for DYRK 1B activity using MBP as a substrate. DYRK 1B levels in
immune complexes were detected by immunoblot with anti-DYRK 1B antibody. In
right panels, lysate proteins were analyzed by western blot, using
antibodies against the indicated proteins. In (f), quiescent cells
were left untreated or treated for the indicated times with 10 nM
R1881, in the absence or presence of the Rac inhibitor EHT1864 (at
10 μM), which was added 2 h before hormonal
stimulation. Rac pull-down assay was performed and the amounts of total Rac
and Rac-GTP were detected by western blot. In (g), quiescent cells
were untreated or treated for 10 min with 1 pM or 10 nM
R1881. Rac pull-down assay was performed as in (f). In (h),
quiescent cells were untreated or treated for 30 min with
10 nM R1881 in the absence or presence of EHT1864
(10 μM). Lysate proteins containing the same amount
of DYRK 1B (loading) were incubated with anti-DYRK 1B antibody. The lower
section shows DYRK 1B activity in immune complexes, assayed using MBP as a
substrate. The upper section shows the western blot of immune complexes with
anti-DYRK 1B antibody
Depleting the cells of DYRK 1B increased BrdU incorporation in 10 nM
R1881-treated cells (right panel in Figure 4c).
BrdU incorporation in 10 nM R1881-treated control cells, expressing
non-targeting siRNA, was similar to the basal level (left panel in Figure 4c). Knockdown of DYRK 1B was verified by the
decrease in protein levels (left section in Figure
4d) and DYRK 1B activity (right section in Figure 4d). The DYRK 1B inhibitor AZ191[22] almost completely blocks both
androgen-triggered DYRK 1B activity (left panel in Figure
4e) and p27Ser10 phosphorylation (right panel in Figure 4e), supporting the role of the kinase in
this phosphorylation.Small GTP-binding proteins control DYRK 1B.[23] Ten nanomolar R1881 (Figures
4f and g), but not 1pM R1881 (Figure
4g), activates Rac1, and the Rac inhibitor EHT1864[24] prevents R1881-triggered activation
of Rac1 (Figure 4f) and DYRK 1B (Figure 4h).In sum, Rac-dependent activation of DYRK 1B triggers p27Ser10
phosphorylation and induces quiescence in 10 nM R118-treated
cells.
Androgen-activated Rac1 inhibits DNA synthesis and stimulates migration
in fibroblasts and fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells
In 10 nM R1881-treated NIH3T3 fibroblasts, EHT1864 increases DNA
synthesis (Figure 5a) and inhibits p27Ser10
phosphorylation (Figure 5b) as well as cell
motility (Supplementary Figures 4S B). In
cells treated with 10 nM R1881, Rac1 knockdown (inset in Figure 5c) enables BrdU incorporation, which is
unaffected by non-targeting siRNA (Figure 5c).
Similarly, EHT1864 increases BrdU incorporation (Figure
5d) and inhibits migration (Supplementary
Figures 4S C) in 10 nM R1881-treated HT1080 cells.
Figure 5
Rac inhibition triggers DNA synthesis and suppresses p27 Ser10
phosphorylation in NIH3T3 fibroblasts and human fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells
treated with 10 nM R1881. In (a–c), NIH3T3 cells
were used. In (a), quiescent cells on coverslips were left untreated
or treated for 18 h with 10 nM R1881 in the absence or
presence of EHT1864 (10 μM). Control cells were treated
with EHT1864 alone. After in vivo pulse, BrdU incorporation was
analyzed by IF and expressed as % of cells. In (b), quiescent
cells were left untreated or treated for 30 min with 10 nM
R1881 in the absence or presence of EHT1864 (10 μM).
Control cells were treated with EHT1864 alone. Lysate proteins were analyzed
by western blot, using antibodies against the indicated proteins. In
(c), growing cells were transfected with non-targeting siRNA
(ctrl siRNA) or Rac1 siRNA (Rac1 siRNA). Cells were co-transfected with
negative control siRNA Alexa-Fluor 488 to help identification of transfected
cells. After transfection, the cells were made quiescent and then left
unstimulated or stimulated for 18 h with 10 nM R1881. After
in vivo pulse, BrdU incorporation was analyzed by IF and
expressed as % of transfected cells. Data are derived from at least
500 scored cells for each experiment. Inset in (c) shows the western
blot with anti-Rac antibody of lysate proteins from cells transfected with
Rac1 or non-targeting (ctrl) siRNA. The filter was re-probed with
anti-tubulin antibody as a loading control (tub). In (d), quiescent
HT1080 cells on coverslips were left untreated or treated for 18 h
with 10 nM R1881 in the absence or presence of EHT1864
(10 μM). Control cells were treated with EHT1864
alone. BrdU incorporation was analyzed as in (a). Means and S.E.M.
are shown
In conclusion, Rac1 activation attenuates mitogenic signalling through DYRK
1B and p27Ser10 phosphorylation, whereas it stimulates migration in 10
nM-stimulated fibroblasts and fibrosarcoma cells.
AR/FlnA association halts DNA synthesis in androgen-treated
fibroblasts
The androgen-triggered AR/FlnA complex controls Rac1 activation and
motility in NIH3T3 fibroblasts.[6]
Aiming to dissect the role of this complex in regulating NIH3T3 cell
proliferation, we initially looked at the effects of the overexpression of
an AR mutant (Δ622-670 hAR)[25] that does not associate with FlnA and inhibits cell
motility in 10 nM R1881-treated NIH3T3 cells.[6]The AR mutant does not mediate R1881-induced activation of DYRK 1B (Figure 6a) or Rac (Figure
6b), indicating that the AR/FlnA complex controls
androgen-triggered Rac/DYRK 1B activation. Ten nanomolar R1881
challenging of cells expressing the wt hAR or the empty pSG5 control plasmid
increased Rac activation (Figure 6b), which was
abolished by EHT1080. Overexpression of the Δ622-670 hAR mutant
increases proliferation (Figure 6c), whereas it
inhibits migration in 10 nM R1881-treated NIH3T3 cells (Figure 6d).
Figure 6
An AR mutant unable to interact with FlnA induces the proliferative phenotype
and impairs motility of NIH3T3 cells challenged with 10 nM R1881. In
(a and b), NIH3T3 cells were transfected with wild-type
hAR (AR wt) or its mutant (622–670 hAR; ΔAR), or the empty pSG5
(ctrl) plasmid. Cells were made quiescent and then left untreated or treated
for 30 min (a) or the indicated times (b) with
10 nM R1881. When indicated, EHT1864 was added at
10 μM. In (a), AR (wt or ΔAR) and DYRK
1B were detected by western blot of lysate proteins using the appropriate
antibodies (loading in upper panel). Lysate proteins were immunoprecipitated
using anti-DYRK 1B antibody, and DYRK 1B activity was assayed using MBP as a
substrate (lower panel). In (b), Rac pull-down assay was performed
and the amount of Rac or Rac-GTP was detected by western blot. In (c
and d), NIH3T3 cells were transfected with the empty (ctrl) or
ΔAR- (ΔAR) encoding plasmid. pEGFP plasmid (at
0.2 μg; Clontech) was included to help identification
of transfected cells. Transfected cells were made quiescent. In (c),
cells were left unstimulated or stimulated for 18 h with 10 nM
R1881. After in vivo pulse, BrdU incorporation was analyzed by IF
and expressed as % of transfected cells. In (d), cells were
left unstimulated or stimulated for 6 h with 10 nM R1881.
Migrated cells were scored and data expressed as relative increase. In
(c and d), data are derived from at least 500 scored cells
for each experiment. Means and S.E.M. are shown
As the hAR mutant lacks a large amino acid sequence, we synthesized a small
peptide derived from the AR 622-670 amino acid sequence responsible for
interaction of the receptor with FlnA.[25] A hydrocarbon-stapled version of this peptide was
also synthesized in which residues Ala628 and Lys632 were each replaced with
an olefinic amino acid that allows them to be cross-linked. This cross-link
locks the peptide into an alpha-helical conformation, as this sequence is
predicted to form an alpha helix. The stapled version should have increased
activity. In fact, stapled peptides have increased cell permeability, higher
affinity for the target, and decreased degradation as compared to their
unstapled counterpart.[26] The amino
acid sequence of the stapled peptide (S) is shown in Supplementary Figure 5S. The S peptide displaces the
10 nM R1881-induced AR/FlnA complex assembly in NIH3T3 cells
(Figure 7a) and inhibits p27Ser10
phosphorylation (Figure 7b). Again, it increases
DNA synthesis (Figure 7c) and inhibits cell
motility (Figure 7d) triggered by 10 nM
R1881 in NIH3T3 cells. Furthermore, the S peptide does not affect
serum-induced DNA synthesis or motility in NIH3T3 cells, and does not
interfere with serum-induced DNA synthesis and motility in AR-negative humanprostate cancerDU-145 cells (Supplementary Figures 5S,
A–D). Thus, the S peptide specifically acts in
androgen-stimulated AR-expressing cells. Finally, the S peptide does not
disrupt the well-known association between FlnA and integrin
β1 [27] in NIH3T3
cells (Supplementary Figure 5S E) and leaves
unaffected AR-mediated transcriptional activity in NIH3T3, LNCaP and HT1080
cells (Supplementary Figure 5S F).
Figure 7
The AR/FlnA complex induces p27 Ser10 phosphorylation, stimulates
migration and halts DNA synthesis in NIH3T3 cells treated with 10 nM
R1881. In (a), quiescent NIH3T3 cells were left untreated or treated
for 5 min with 10 nM R1881, in the absence or presence of the
indicated concentrations of S peptide (1 or 10 nM). The peptide was
added 30 min before hormonal stimulation. Lysates were incubated with
anti-AR antibody and proteins in immune complexes were blotted with
antibodies against the indicated proteins. In (b), quiescent cells on
coverslips were left untreated or treated for 18 h with 10 nM
R1881 in the absence or presence of the indicated concentration of S
peptide. After in vivo pulse, BrdU incorporation was analyzed as
above. In (c), quiescent cells were left untreated or treated with
10 nM R1881 in the absence or presence of the indicated
concentrations of S peptide. Cells were allowed to migrate in trans-well
chambers and migrated cells were scored by fluorescent microscopy. Data were
expressed as relative increase. In (d), quiescent NIH3T3 cells were
left untreated or treated for 30 min with 10 nM R1881, in the
absence or presence of 10 nM S peptide. Control cells were treated
with 10 nM S peptide alone. Lysate proteins were immune-blotted with
antibodies against the indicated proteins. In (e and f),
growing cells were transfected with non-targeting (ctrl siRNA) or FlnA (FlnA
siRNA) siRNA. Cells were co-transfected with negative control siRNA
Alexa-Fluor 488 to help identification of transfected cells. In (e),
the western blot of lysate proteins from cells transfected with
non-targeting (ctrl siRNA) or targeting (FlnA siRNA) siRNA with anti-FlnA
antibody is shown. The filter was re-probed with anti-tubulin antibody as
the loading control (tub). In (f), cells transfected with ctrl siRNA
or FlnA siRNA were made quiescent and then left unstimulated or stimulated
for 18 h with 10 nM R1881. After in vivo pulse, BrdU
incorporation was analyzed by IF and expressed as % of transfected
cells. In (g), cells transfected with ctrl siRNA or FlnA siRNA were
made quiescent and then left unstimulated or stimulated with 10 nM
R1881. Migrated cells were scored and data expressed as relative increase.
In (b, c, f and g), data are derived from at
least 500 scored cells for each experiment. Means and S.E.M. are shown
Depleting NIH3T3 cells of FlnA (Figure 7e)
increases DNA synthesis (Figure 7f) and inhibits
migration (Figure 7g) triggered by 10 nM
R1881.In conclusion, data in Figures 6 and 7 indicate that the AR/FlnA complex
simultaneously halts cell cycle and promotes migration in cells challenged
with physiological androgen concentration through its action on Rac.
Interfering in this complex restores the proliferative phenotype, whereas
impairing the migratory phenotype of fibroblasts.
Androgens counteract Ras-induced transformation
Ras- and Src-transformed NIH3T3 fibroblasts harbor AR (Supplementary Figure 2S B).[5] We therefore analyzed the ability of androgens to
reduce fibroblast transformation induced by the oncogenic form of Src
(Src527F)[28] or Ras
(V12Ras).[29] Albeit to a
different extent, the activated forms of Src and Ras transform NIH3T3
fibroblasts in a focus assay (Figures 8a and b).
Ten nanomolar R1881 drastically reduces transformation by Ras, leaving
Src-induced transformation unaffected (Figures 8a and
b). Again, 10 nM R1881 inhibits BrdU incorporation in
Ras- but not in Src-transformed fibroblasts (Figure
8c), and triggers rapid (15 min) and persistent
(8 h) p27Ser10 phosphorylation in Ras-transformed cells. In
contrast, p27Thr187 phosphorylation peaks at 30 min and then
decreases (Figure 8d). The sustained p27Ser10
phosphorylation we observe in different experiments (Supplementary Figures 6S A) is likely due to DYRK 1B
hyperactivation in Ras-transformed cells.[30] Thus, the rapid and persistent p27Ser10
phosphorylation induced by androgens in Ras-transformed fibroblasts
overcomes the effect of p27Thr187 phosphorylation with consequent p27
degradation,[31] and might
be responsible for the inhibitory action of androgen. Oncogenic Src likely
escapes the androgen effect through alternative nuclear effectors (e.g.,
Myc)28 to those used by Ras in transforming cells.
Figure 8
Androgen inhibits Ras- but not Src-induced transformation. In (a and
b), NIH3T3 cells were transfected with the indicated expression
plasmids or the empty plasmid (ctrl) and cultured in the absence or presence
of 10 nM R1881 as reported in Methods. After 12 days, the cells were
stained with 0.5% crystal violet and the number of foci was counted.
In (a), mean values from three independent experiments, each
conducted in duplicate, are shown in the graph, representing the percentages
of transformed foci relative to Src527F or RasV12 plasmids. The standard
error for each value is shown. n represents the number of
experiments. In (b), representative plates from a single experiment
conducted in duplicate are shown. Growing Src- or Ras-transformed NIH3T3
cells were used. In (c), cells on coverslips were maintained for 3
days in 0.5% dextran-coated charcoal-stripped serum and then left
unstimulated or stimulated for 18 h with 10 nM R1881. After
in vivo pulse, BrdU incorporation was analyzed as above. Data
are derived from at least 800 scored cells for each experiment. Means and
S.E.M. are shown. n represents the number of experiments. In
(d), Ras-transformed cells were maintained for 3 days in
0.5% dextran-coated charcoal-stripped serum and then left
unstimulated or stimulated for the indicated times with 10 nM R1881.
Lysate proteins were analyzed using the anti-P-Ser10 or P-Thr197 p27.
Filters were re-probed with p27 or anti-tubulin (tub) Ab, as the loading
control
Discussion
We here investigated the role of AR in proliferation of mesenchymal and
transformed mesenchymal cells. Ten nanomolar R1881 or DHT fails to induce DNA
synthesis in primary or immortalized untransformed fibroblasts and humanfibrosarcomaHT1080 cells. The anti-androgen Bic (Casodex) allows DNA synthesis
and proliferation, indicating the involvement of AR in these proliferative
responses to the antagonist. It should be noted that Bic, frequently used in
human PCa androgen deprivation therapy, often promotes PCa
progression.[1] Our findings
indicate that Bic induces undesired signals in mesenchymal cells.Androgens stimulate fibroblast DNA synthesis at very low (picomolar)
concentration, and cell motility at higher (nanomolar)
concentration.[5, 6] Thus, mesenchymal cells can switch from a
proliferative to a migratory phenotype when androgen concentration increases.
The migratory effect exerted by androgens could play a role in different
physiological and pathological conditions, including male sexual
differentiation, when presumptive peritubular myoid cells migrate into the
testis from mesonephros. At this stage, peritubular myoid cells strongly reduce
their proliferation rate and begin to consistently express AR during their
inward migration.[32] In adults, such a
switch might locally occur during wound healing or cancer progression.We analyzed the mechanism underlying the molecular switch from proliferative to
migratory action of androgens. The mode of action of androgens does not depend
on the dichotomous androgen effect on AR-mediated transcription or AR nuclear
translocation, as shown in Supplementary data
(Supplementary Figure 6S).5 AR
is, indeed, permanently poised in the extra-nuclear compartment of NIH3T3 and
HT1080 cells, where it recruits different effectors or scaffolds leading to
different biological outcomes. At low androgen levels, AR recruits Src and the
regulatory subunit of PI3-K, and activates Erk and Akt (Supplementary Figure 6S),5 thereby fostering
proliferation. In contrast, at high androgen levels, AR recruits FlnA and cell
migration follows.[6] Upon 10 nM
androgen-triggered AR/FlnA complex assembly, FlnA acts as a scaffold for the
spatial organization of the Rac-mediated signalling pathway, enabling the
recruitment by Rac of specific effectors (e.g., DYRK 1B) involved in cell
quiescence.In addition to stimulating proliferation, Rho protein family members might
inhibit cell cycle.[33] Rho E behaves as
an onco-suppressor gene in PCa[34] and
halts cell cycle in serum-stimulated NIH3T3 fibroblasts.[35] We here report that AR-mediated cell
cycle inhibition depends on the activation of Rac 1 and its dependent pathway in
fibroblasts and HT1080 cells. DYRK 1B is controlled by Rac-activated MKK3 and
induces NIH3T3 cell quiescence.[19] We
have consistently observed that 10 nM R1881 triggers Rac activity, which
controls DYRK 1B in NIH3T3 cells. Experiments with inhibitors of Rac1 and DYRK
1B strengthen the role of these effectors in androgen-driven p27Ser10
phosphorylation. Neither Rac nor DYRK 1B activation is detected in NIH3T3 cells
treated with low (1 pM) androgen concentration, which triggers the
proliferative phenotype. Silencing and chemical inhibition of DYRK 1B allows DNA
synthesis, further supporting the role of this enzyme in the quiescent state of
10 nM R1881-treated NIH3T3 fibroblasts. The observed effect by EHT1864 or
Rac silencing links androgen-triggered Rac activation with DYRK 1B activity and
cell quiescence. In sum, the 10 nM androgen-triggered
FlnA/Rac/DYRK 1B pathway halts cell cycle through p27Ser10
phosphorylation and might also lead to the inhibition of transformation induced
by oncogenic Ras, but not oncogenic Src in these cells. Thus, AR could act as a
growth suppressor by specifically inhibiting Ras-driven pathways, without
interfering in the proliferation elicited by different signalling mechanisms.
DYRK 1B is an active kinase in pancreatic, ovarian and colon cancer cells, and
controls hedgehog signalling in the stromal compartment of mouse model of
pancreatic cancer.[36] Oncogenic Ras
activates DYRK 1B through the Rac1/MKK3 signalling pathway, indicating that
DYRK 1B acts as a regulator in Ras-driven transformation and tumor
progression.[30, 36, 37] Notably, DYRK 1B
inhibition enables the growth of stromal cells in a genetic model of pancreaticcancer, likely through hedgehog signalling.[37] By increasing fibroblast growth and stromal collagen
content, DYRK 1B inhibition might restrain tumor growth in vivo.Ras oncogenic mutations have been described in a large number of cancers,
including pancreatic (90%), colon (50%), lung (30%) and
thyroid tumors (50%) as well as myeloid leukemia
(30%).38 Pancreatic, colon and lung cancers express
AR.[39, 40] Proliferation of various AR-expressing pancreaticcancer cells is insensitive to DHT,[41]
and androgens inhibit colon tumor survival through a putative membrane
AR.[42] The growth of small-cell
lung carcinoma H1184 cell line is sensitive to low, but not high, DHT
concentrations, and the growth of non-small-cell lung carcinoma H1993 cell line
is inhibited by DHT.[39] We observe that
the proliferation of humanfibrosarcomaHT1080 cells, exhibiting an activated
N-Ras,[13] is insensitive to
10 nM androgen. Thus, androgens might elicit anti-proliferative signals
in humancancers bearing Ras oncogenic mutations. Altogether, these findings
indicate that further exploration of the androgen/AR axis should be pursued
in stromal and epithelial compartment of these cancers. Lastly, the stapled
peptide used in this study, as well as other small molecules capable of
disrupting the AR/FlnA interaction, might represent a promising approach to
specifically modulate AR functions in stromal tissue and rescue hormone
proliferative responsiveness in humanprostate cancers.
Materials and Methods
Chemical reagents
TentaGel R RAM resin was obtained from Peptide International Inc.
(Louisville, KY, USA). N-alpha-Fmoc-protected amino acids were purchased
from Novabiochem (San Diego, CA, USA). The N-alpha-Fmoc-protected unusual
olefinic amino acid (S)-2-(((9H-fluoren-9-yl)
methoxy)carbonyl-amino)-2-methyl-hept-6-enoic acid (Fmoc-S5-OH) was used for
synthesis of the stapled peptide. Solvents and coupling reagents,
2-(1H-benzotriazole-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate and
1-hydroxybenzotriazole were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI, USA)
and American Bioanalytical (Natick, MA, USA). The Rac inhibitor EHT1846 was
from Sigma. The DYRK 1B inhibitor AZ191 was from Selleckchem (Houston, TX,
USA).
Constructs
The wt hAR was in pSG5 [43] and the
mutant Δ622-670 hAR was in psV1.[25] The kinase-active Src (Src527F)[28] and the active form of Ras (Ras
V12)[29] were used. The
HA-tagged wt p27 and the mutant Ser10Ala p27 in pcDNA3[17] were a gift from M. Pagano
(Department of Pathology, NYU Cancer Institute, University School of
Medicine and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, NY, USA). The human
full-length p27 promoter (pGL2-p27-Luc) was a gift from P. Coffer
(Department of Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The
Netherlands). The 3416 construct, containing four copies of the wt
slp-HRE2 (5′-TGGTCAgccAGTTCT-3′)
and the 3424 construct
(5′-TGGACAgccAGTTCT-3′), were cloned in the
NheI site in pTK-TATA-Luc.[44]
Cell culture, transfection, transactivation assay and siRNA
Src- and Ras-transformed NIH3T3 fibroblasts were a gift from M.V. Barone
(Department of Translational Medical Science and European Laboratory for the
Investigation of Food Induced Disease, University of Naples Federico II,
Naples, Italy). They were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS),
100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml
streptomycin (Pen/Strepto) and glutamine (2 mM), and maintained
at 37 °C in humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.
Twenty-four hours before androgen stimulation, cell medium was replaced with
phenol red-free DMEM containing Pen/Strepto and supplemented with
0.1% charcoal-stripped serum. Karyotypically heterogeneous humanfibrosarcomaHT1080 cells[45] were a
gift from P. Friedl (Department of Cell Biology, Radboud University Nijmegen
Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands). HT1080 cells, early-passage
NIH3T3 cells, MEFs and MFs were cultured in DMEM supplemented with
10% FCS, Pen/Strepto, glutamine (2 mM), and maintained at
37 °C in humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. Unless
otherwise stated, NIH3T3, MEF, MF and HT1080 cells were made quiescent using
phenol red-free DMEM supplemented with Pen/Strepto, glutamine
(2 mM) and 0.1% charcoal-stripped FCS for 24 h.
Prostate cancer-derived fast-growing LNCaP and DU-145 cells were from ATCC
(Manassas, VA, USA). They were cultured in RPMI1640 supplemented with
5% (LNCaP) or 10% (DU-145) FCS and Pen/Strepto, and
maintained at 37 °C in humidified 5% CO2
atmosphere. After reaching sub-confluence, growing LNCaP cells were kept in
phenol red-free RPMI1640 medium containing 5% charcoal-stripped calf
serum and Pen/Strepto for 3 days and then used. Growing DU-145 cells
were kept in phenol red-free RPMI1640 containing Pen/Strepto and
glutamine (2 mM) in the absence of serum for 24 h and then
used. Purified wt or ΔAR mutant encoding plasmids were transfected at
1 μg in sub-confluent NIH3T3 cells, using the
Superfect reagent (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany). Twenty-four hours later,
transfected cells were made quiescent and used. For ARE-luc reporter assay,
NIH3T3 cells (at 70% confluence) in phenol red-free DMEM containing
10% charcoal-stripped serum were used. Cells were transfected by
Superfect with 1 μg of 3416-pTK-TATA-Luc or
3424-pTK-TATA-Luc constructs, alone or with 0.5 μg
pSG5-hAR-expressing plasmid. Ten hours later, transfected cells were made
quiescent for 24 h and then left unstimulated or stimulated with
1 pM or 10 nM R1881 (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) for
18 h. The purified humanp27 promoter was transfected (at
1 μg) using Superfect in sub-confluent NIH3T3 cells
in phenol red-free DMEM containing 10% serum. Twelve hours later,
transfected cells were made quiescent and then left unstimulated or
stimulated with 1 pM or 10 nM R1881 (Perkin Elmer) or
20% serum for 10 h. Luciferase activity from cell lysates was
measured using a luciferase assay system (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI,
USA) and values were corrected using
CH110-expressed-β-galactosidase activity (GE Healthcare,
Little Chalfont, UK). The purified human HA-tagged p27 (wt or S10A) was
transfected (at 0.5 μg) using Superfect in sub-confluent
NIH3T3 cells cultured in DMEM containing 10% serum. Ten hours later,
transfected cells were made quiescent for 36 h and then left
unstimulated or stimulated. When indicated, cycloheximide (Sigma) was added
(at 50 μg/ml) 8 h before hormonal stimulation.
FlnA siRNA was performed using a three target-specific 20–25 nt siRNA
pool (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA). Rac1 siRNA was
performed using a four target-specific 20–25 nt siRNA pool (Santa
Cruz). Non-targeting siRNAs, containing a scrambled sequence, were from
Santa Cruz. DYRK 1B siRNA was performed using double-stranded Stealth DYRK
1B siRNA (Explera, Jesi, Italy). Non-targeting siRNA was from Explera.
siRNAs were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Gibco, Monza, Italy) in
growing NIH3T3 cells in Optimem/DMEM (50% v/v) containing
10% serum. Transfection medium was discarded 10 h later and
cells were washed twice using phenol red-free DMEM. Transfected cells were
then made quiescent for 36 h and used.
Migration, DNA synthesis, MTT analysis, fluorescence-activated cell
sorting analysis and transformation assay
Trans-well assay was performed using collagen (type I from rat-tail at
100 mg/ml; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA)-coated Trans-well
chamber system with 8 μm pore polycarbonate membrane
(Nunc, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). NIH3T3 cells were
plated in the upper chamber at 2 × 104 per well in
200 μl of phenol red-free DMEM containing 0.5%
bovine serum albumin. In FlnA siRNA experiments, NIH3T3 cells were
co-transfected with siRNA Alexa Fluor 488 to help identify the transfected
cells. Cells were allowed to migrate for 6 h in a humidified chamber
at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in the absence or presence
of the indicated compounds. Cells on the upper side were then detached.
NIH3T3 fibroblasts on the underside were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde
(Sigma) for 15 min and stained with Hoechst 33258 (Sigma) for
10 min. Alexa Fluor 488-transfected NIH3T3 fibroblasts were fixed in
4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. Cells were finally counted
with a DMBL (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) fluorescent microscope using HCPL
Fluotar × 20 objective in 10 random microscopic fields. DNA synthesis
was evaluated by analysing BrdU incorporation. After in vivo pulse
with 100 μM (final concentration) BrdU (Sigma), BrdU
incorporation was analyzed by immunofluorescence (IF), as
reported.[5] MTT assay was
performed as described.[46] For
fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, quiescent NIH3T3 cells (2.0
× 105 for each experimental point) were left untreated or
treated for the indicated times with 10 nM R1881. Cells were collected,
resuspended in 500 μl of a buffer containing 0.1%
NP-40, 0.1% sodium citrate, 50 μg/ml propidium
iodide, 1 mg/ml RNAse A and 0.1 mM EDTA. Cells were then
incubated in the dark for 30 min and samples were measured by a FACS
Calibur flow cytometer using Cell Quest software (Becton Dickinson, BD
Biosciences). Results from three different experiments were analyzed using
Cell Quest software (Becton Dickinson) and ModFit LT version 3 Software
(Verity, Topsham, ME, USA). For transformation assay, early-passage NIH3T3
cells were seeded at 1.5 × 105 cells per well in 6-well
dishes the day before transfection with purified RasV12 or Src527F encoding
plasmids (both at 0.5 μg). Transfection was performed using
Superfect in cells cultured in DMEM containing 10% charcoal-stripped
FCS, as reported.[47] Two days
later, the cells were transferred to 10 cm plates. After reaching
confluence, they were kept in DMEM containing 5% charcoal-stripped
FCS. When indicated, R1881 (10 nM) was added every day. Control
plates were treated with vehicle alone (0.001% ethanol). After 12
days, the plates were stained with 0.5% crystal violet.
Immunofluorescence
Cells on coverslips were fixed and permeabilized.[5] Endogenous AR in NIH3T3 cells was visualized
using diluted (1 : 100 in PBS) rabbit polyclonal anti-AR
antibody (Ab-2, Neo-Markers, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). Rabbit antibody
was detected using diluted (1 : 200 in PBS containing
0.2% bovine serum albumin) anti-rabbitfluorescein-conjugated
antibodies (Jackson Laboratories, Las Vegas, NV, USA). DNA synthesis was
analyzed using diluted (1 : 50 in PBS) mouse monoclonal
anti-BrdU antibody (clone BU-1, GE Healthcare). Mouse antibody was detected
using diluted (1 : 200 in PBS) Texas red-conjugated goat
anti-mouse antibody (Jackson Laboratories). Endogenous p27 was stained using
diluted (1 : 100 in PBS containing 0.1% bovine serum
albumin) rabbit anti-p27 polyclonal antibody (C-19; Santa Cruz). Diluted
(1 : 200 in PBS) anti-rabbitfluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated antibody (Jackson Laboratories) was used as a
secondary antibody. For localization of ectopically expressed p27, staining
was performed using anti-HA (F-5; Santa Cruz) as primary antibody and
FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Jackson Laboratories) as the secondary
reagent. Coverslips were finally stained with Hoechst 33258, inverted and
mounted in Mowiol (Calbiochem, Millipore/Merck KGaA, Darmstadt,
Germany). Fields were analyzed with a DMBL Leica (Leica) fluorescent
microscope using HCX PL Apo × 63 oil objective. Images were captured
using DC480 camera (Leica) and acquired using FW4000 (Leica) software.
Confocal microscopy analysis was performed using a Zeiss LSM 510 laser
scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Göttingen,
Germany), as reported.[48] The image
collection periods and exposures are identical for the different
experimental conditions.
Peptide synthesis
Peptides were synthesized by 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl (Fmoc)/tert-butyl
solid-phase method with an Applied Biosystem (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.)
peptide synthesizer A431. Peptides were assembled on TentaGel R RAm resin
with an initial load of 0.19 mmol/g. Coupling reactions were
conducted by means of the
2-(1H-benzotriazole-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium
hexafluorophosphate-1-hydroxybenzotriazole method. N-terminal primary amines
were acetylated utilizing acetic anhydride and diisopropylethylamine (DIEA).
For the stapled peptide, Fmoc-S5-OH was coupled manually in threefold molar
excess in the presence of
2-(1H-benzotriazole-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate,
1-hydroxybenzotriazole and DIEA. The ring-closing metathesis reaction was
performed on the N-terminal acetylated peptide while still on the solid
support according to literature.[49,
50, 51] Cleavage of peptides from the resin was achieved
with a trifluoroacetic acid/water/triisopropylsilane mixture
(92.5/5/2.5, v/v) for 3 h. After the resin had been
removed by filtration, the filtrate was concentrated by flushing with
nitrogen gas and crude peptides were precipitated with diethyl ether. Crude
peptide was purified using reversed-phase high-performance liquid
chromatography on a preparative C4 column (BioAdvantage Pro 300, Thomson
Liquid Chromatography, Thomson Instrument Company, Oceanside, CA, USA) with
a water/acetonitrile solvent system containing trifluoroacetic acid.
Purified peptide was characterized by matrix-associated laser desorption
ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI micro MX, Waters,Milford,
MA, USA) and reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography on an
analytical C18 column (Eclipse XDB-C18, Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, CA,
USA). The purity of the peptides was found to be >95%.
Antibody, immunoprecipitation, immunoblotting, kinase and Rac
assays
Lysates (at 2 mg/ml protein concentration) were prepared as
reported.[14] Rac activity
from quiescent NIH3T3 was analyzed as described,[5] using the Rac Activation Assay Kit (Upstate
Biotechnology Inc., Lake Placid, NY, USA). AR was revealed using rabbit
polyclonal anti-AR antibodies (N-20 or C19; Santa Cruz). The rabbit
polyclonal anti-ERalpha antibody (543; Santa Cruz) was used to detect
ERalpha. PgR was detected using the mouse monoclonal anti-PgR antibody (6A1;
Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). Total Akt and P-Ser 473 Akt
were detected using appropriate antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology). Erk
and P-Tyr 204 Erk were detected using appropriate antibodies (Santa Cruz).
p27 was detected using rabbit anti-p27 polyclonal antibody (C-19; Santa
Cruz; diluted 1 : 100 in PBS containing 0.1% bovine
serum albumin). For CDK-4 detection, the rabbit polyclonal antibody (c-22
from Santa Cruz) was used. Rabbit polyclonal anti-phosho-p27 antibodies
(P-Ser10 or P-Thr187; Zymed Laboratories, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.)
were used to reveal P-p27. DYRK 1B was immunoprecipitated and revealed by
western blot using the rabbit polyclonal anti-DYRK 1B antibody (Cell
Signaling Technology). DYRK 1B activity in immune complexes was assayed as
reported,[52] using myelin
basic protein as a substrate. The ECL system (GE Healthcare) was used to
detect immunoreactive proteins.
Authors: Federico Bernal; Andrew F Tyler; Stanley J Korsmeyer; Loren D Walensky; Gregory L Verdine Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2007-02-07 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: P Rodriguez-Viciana; P H Warne; A Khwaja; B M Marte; D Pappin; P Das; M D Waterfield; A Ridley; J Downward Journal: Cell Date: 1997-05-02 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Freddyson J Martínez-Rivera; Juliana Pérez-Laspiur; María E Santiago-Gascot; Abner G Alemán-Reyes; Emanuel García-Santiago; Yolanda Rodríguez-Pérez; Cristhian Calo-Guadalupe; Inelia Otero-Pagán; Roxsana N Ayala-Pagán; Magdiel Martínez; Yisel M Cantres-Rosario; Loyda M Meléndez; Jennifer L Barreto-Estrada Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Erika Di Zazzo; Giovanni Galasso; Pia Giovannelli; Marzia Di Donato; Gabriella Castoria Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2018-01-18 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Marzia Di Donato; Giovanni Galasso; Pia Giovannelli; Antonio A Sinisi; Antimo Migliaccio; Gabriella Castoria Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol Date: 2021-06-29
Authors: Erika Di Zazzo; Giovanni Galasso; Pia Giovannelli; Marzia Di Donato; Annalisa Di Santi; Gustavo Cernera; Valentina Rossi; Ciro Abbondanza; Bruno Moncharmont; Antonio Agostino Sinisi; Gabriella Castoria; Antimo Migliaccio Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-01-05