Suman Rathbun1, Alfonso Tafur2, Russell Grant3, Naomi Esmon4, Karin Mauer5, Richard A Marlar6. 1. Cardiovascular section, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, USA. Electronic address: Suman-rathbun@ouhsc.edu. 2. Cardiovascular section, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, USA. 3. Labcorp of America Holdings, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. 4. Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA. 5. Department of Geriatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, USA. 6. Department of Pathology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Rivaroxaban, a new oral anti-Xa agent, has been approved for use without routine monitoring, but the lack of a predictable drug level measurement may hinder the management of anticoagulated patients. The aims of the project were to correlate a Anti-Factor Xa assay using commercial calibrators and controls (Riva Activity) with serum drug levels analyzed by HPLC-MS/MS (Riva MS) in patients currently receiving rivaroxaban, and secondly, to correlate the PT/PTT, thrombin generation (CAT assay) and Thromboelastograph (TEG) with the Riva activity and Riva MS. METHODS: Recruited patients receiving rivaroxaban prospectively had a total of 3 blood samples taken at least 2 hours apart. Plasma was divided for measurement of PT/PTT, Riva activity, rivaroxaban HPCL-MS/MS, and thrombin generation. TEG activity was measured at one random time point for each patient. Correlation and linear regression evaluations were used to compare the different assays. RESULTS: The cases were 22 patients on rivaroxaban, age 56+12.6, and 10 healthy controls. There was a strong correlation between Riva activity compared to serum Riva MS (r=0.99). We found a statistically significant correlation between PT/INR compared to serum measurements of Riva MS (r=0.68) and anti-Xa activity (r=0.69). The peak (r=-0.50) and lag time (r=0.57) CAT correlated with Riva MS measurements. There was no correlation between Riva MS and PTT, TEG R, TEG MA, Endogenous Thrombin potential. CONCLUSION: Riva anti-factor Xa activity assay measured with commercial calibrators and controls provides a reliable assessment of rivaroxaban serum levels for patients requiring measurement of anticoagulant activity. Correlation with other coagulation tests is not sufficiently strong to be used clinically.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Rivaroxaban, a new oral anti-Xa agent, has been approved for use without routine monitoring, but the lack of a predictable drug level measurement may hinder the management of anticoagulated patients. The aims of the project were to correlate a Anti-Factor Xa assay using commercial calibrators and controls (Riva Activity) with serum drug levels analyzed by HPLC-MS/MS (Riva MS) in patients currently receiving rivaroxaban, and secondly, to correlate the PT/PTT, thrombin generation (CAT assay) and Thromboelastograph (TEG) with the Riva activity and Riva MS. METHODS: Recruited patients receiving rivaroxaban prospectively had a total of 3 blood samples taken at least 2 hours apart. Plasma was divided for measurement of PT/PTT, Riva activity, rivaroxabanHPCL-MS/MS, and thrombin generation. TEG activity was measured at one random time point for each patient. Correlation and linear regression evaluations were used to compare the different assays. RESULTS: The cases were 22 patients on rivaroxaban, age 56+12.6, and 10 healthy controls. There was a strong correlation between Riva activity compared to serum Riva MS (r=0.99). We found a statistically significant correlation between PT/INR compared to serum measurements of Riva MS (r=0.68) and anti-Xa activity (r=0.69). The peak (r=-0.50) and lag time (r=0.57) CAT correlated with Riva MS measurements. There was no correlation between Riva MS and PTT, TEG R, TEG MA, Endogenous Thrombin potential. CONCLUSION:Riva anti-factor Xa activity assay measured with commercial calibrators and controls provides a reliable assessment of rivaroxaban serum levels for patients requiring measurement of anticoagulant activity. Correlation with other coagulation tests is not sufficiently strong to be used clinically.
Authors: Priscilla Bento Matos Derogis; Livia Rentas Sanches; Valdir Fernandes de Aranda; Marjorie Paris Colombini; Cristóvão Luis Pitangueira Mangueira; Marcelo Katz; Adriana Caschera Leme Faulhaber; Claudio Ernesto Albers Mendes; Carlos Eduardo Dos Santos Ferreira; Carolina Nunes França; João Carlos de Campos Guerra Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 3.240