Literature DB >> 25476553

Impact of a quality improvement program on primary healthcare in Canada: a mixed-method evaluation.

Stewart B Harris1, Michael E Green2, Judith Belle Brown3, Sharon Roberts4, Grant Russell5, Meghan Fournie6, Susan Webster-Bogaert7, Jann Paquette-Warren8, Jyoti Kotecha9, Han Han10, Amardeep Thind11, Moira Stewart12, Sonja Reichert13, Jordan W Tompkins14, Richard Birtwhistle15.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Rigorous comprehensive evaluations of primary healthcare (PHC) quality improvement (QI) initiatives are lacking. This article describes the evaluation of the Quality Improvement and Innovation Partnership Learning Collaborative (QIIP-LC), an Ontario-wide PHC QI program targeting type 2 diabetes management, colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, access to care, and team functioning.
METHODS: This article highlights the primary outcome results of an external retrospective, multi-measure, mixed-method evaluation of the QIIP-LC, including: (1) matched-control pre-post chart audit of diabetes management (A1c/foot exams) and rate of CRC screening; (2) post-only advanced access survey (third-next available appointment); and (3) post-only semi-structured interviews (team functioning).
RESULTS: Chart audit data was collected from 34 consenting physicians per group (of which 88% provided access data). Between-group differences were not statistically significant (A1c [p=0.10]; foot exams [p=0.45]; CRC screening [p=0.77]; advanced access [p=0.22]). Qualitative interview (n=42) themes highlighted the success of the program in helping build interdisciplinary team functioning and capacity.
CONCLUSION: The rigorous design and methodology of the QIIP-LC evaluation utilizing a control group is one of the most significant efforts thus far to demonstrate the impact of a QI program in PHC, with improvements over time in both QIIP and control groups offering a likely explanation for the lack of statistically significant primary outcomes. Team functioning was a key success, with team-based chronic care highlighted as pivotal for improved health outcomes. Policy makers should strive to endorse QI programs with proven success through rigorous evaluation to ensure evidence-based healthcare policy and funding.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced access; Colorectal cancer screening; Diabetes; Evaluation; Interdisciplinary teams; Primary healthcare; Quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25476553     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  12 in total

1.  Impact of a provincial quality-improvement program on primary health care in Ontario: a population-based controlled before-and-after study.

Authors:  Michael E Green; Stewart B Harris; Susan Webster-Bogaert; Han Han; Jyoti Kotecha; Alexander Kopp; Minnie M Ho; Richard V Birtwhistle; Richard H Glazier
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-04-06

2.  Processes that influence the evolution of family health teams.

Authors:  Judith Belle Brown; Bridget L Ryan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Longitudinal evaluation of physician payment reform and team-based care for chronic disease management and prevention.

Authors:  Tara Kiran; Alexander Kopp; Rahim Moineddin; Richard H Glazier
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Choosing Wisely Canada campaign associated with less overuse of thyroid testing: Retrospective parallel cohort study.

Authors:  Kimberly Wintemute; Michelle Greiver; Warren McIsaac; M Elisabeth Del Giudice; Frank Sullivan; Babak Aliarzadeh; Sumeet Kalia; Chris Meaney; Rahim Moineddin; Alexander Singer
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Heterogeneity in general practitioners' preferences for quality improvement programs: a choice experiment and policy simulation in France.

Authors:  Mehdi Ammi; Christine Peyron
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2016-09-15

6.  Impact of a primary healthcare quality improvement program on diabetes in Canada: evaluation of the Quality Improvement and Innovation Partnership (QIIP).

Authors:  Sonja M Reichert; Stewart B Harris; Jordan W Tompkins; Judith Belle-Brown; Meghan Fournie; Michael Green; Han Han; Jyoti Kotecha; Selam Mequanint; Jann Paquette-Warren; Sharon Roberts; Grant Russell; Moira Stewart; Amardeep Thind; Susan Webster-Bogaert; Richard Birtwhistle
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2017-08-29

7.  Governance of Iranian Primary Health Care System: Perceptions of Experts.

Authors:  Jafar Sadegh Tabrizi; Faramarz Pourasghar; Raana Gholamzadeh Nikjoo
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.429

8.  Examining Primary Healthcare Performance through a Triple Aim Lens.

Authors:  Bridget L Ryan; Judith Belle Brown; Richard H Glazier; Brian Hutchison
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2016-02

9.  Case study of evaluations that go beyond clinical outcomes to assess quality improvement diabetes programmes using the Diabetes Evaluation Framework for Innovative National Evaluations (DEFINE).

Authors:  Jann Paquette-Warren; Stewart B Harris; Mariam Naqshbandi Hayward; Jordan W Tompkins
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  Virtual learning collaboratives to improve urine culturing and antibiotic prescribing in long-term care: controlled before-and-after study.

Authors:  Andrea Chambers; Cynthia Chen; Kevin Antoine Brown; Nick Daneman; Bradley Langford; Valerie Leung; Kwaku Adomako; Kevin L Schwartz; Julia E Moore; Jacquelyn Quirk; Sam MacFarlane; Tim Cronsberry; Gary E Garber
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 7.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.