Literature DB >> 25476041

The safety of self-administered allergen immunotherapy during the buildup and maintenance phases.

Frederick M Schaffer1, Andrew R Naples, Myla Ebeling, Thomas C Hulsey, Larry M Garner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-administered allergen immunotherapy is considered controversial. We believe the implementation of a self-administration protocol characterized by patient preselection and a slow buildup phase is safe.
METHODS: We analyzed 23,614 patient records and associated immunotherapy injections for systemic reactions (SR) during a 1-year period (2011 to 2012). SRs were graded in accordance with the World Allergy Organization (WAO) criteria.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven SRs were reported for 23,614 patients who self-administered 2,021,600 injections yielding an annual SR rate of 0.16% (per patient) or 0.002% (per injection). Only 9 of 4643 pediatric (0.19%) and 28 of 18,971 adult patients (0.15%) experienced 1 or more SRs. No deaths (grade V SR) occurred. From 2009 through early 2014, over 90,000 patients received more than 10 million injections in accordance with the United Allergy Services (UAS) protocol without fatalities.
CONCLUSION: We believe this safety profile is due to a preselection of patients to exclude those with a high risk for adverse reactions and a slow immunotherapy buildup phase. In contrast, previous studies documented office-based SRs ranging from approximately 3% to greater than 14%. Thus, the UAS home-immunotherapy SR rate is significantly lower than office-based immunotherapy SR rates (p < 0.0001). The enhanced safety of this protocol results in a decreased frequency and severity of SRs. This safety report, derived from analyses of one of the largest patient cohorts studied, corroborates and expands the observations of previous studies of self-administered subcutaneous immunotherapy in a low-risk patient population by assessing self-administered allergen immunotherapy during the buildup and maintenance phases.
© 2014 ARS-AAOA, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allergen immunotherapy; epinephrine; safety; self-administration; systemic reaction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25476041      PMCID: PMC4465093          DOI: 10.1002/alr.21443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol        ISSN: 2042-6976            Impact factor:   3.858


  48 in total

1.  Emergency treatment of anaphylaxis in adults: concise guidance.

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.659

2.  CSM Update: Desensitising vaccines.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-10-11

Review 3.  Mechanisms of subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy.

Authors:  Ozge U Soyer; Mubeccel Akdis; Cezmi A Akdis
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.479

4.  At-home administration of allergenic extracts.

Authors:  C J Falliers
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 10.793

5.  Dose dependence of immunological response to sublingual immunotherapy.

Authors:  F Marcucci; L Sensi; G Di Cara; C Incorvaia; F Frati
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 13.146

Review 6.  Allergen immunotherapy practice in the United States: guidelines, measures, and outcomes.

Authors:  Linda Cox; Robert E Esch; Mark Corbett; Cheryl Hankin; Michael Nelson; Greg Plunkett
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 6.347

7.  Stability of standardized grass, dust mite, cat, and short ragweed allergens after mixing with mold or cockroach extracts.

Authors:  Thomas J Grier; Dawn M LeFevre; Elizabeth A Duncan; Robert E Esch
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.347

8.  Twelve-year survey of fatal reactions to allergen injections and skin testing: 1990-2001.

Authors:  David I Bernstein; Mark Wanner; Larry Borish; Gary M Liss
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 9.  The safety of allergen immunotherapy: a literature review.

Authors:  P R Cook; C Farias
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.697

10.  A double-blind placebo-controlled evaluation of sublingual immunotherapy with a standardized ragweed extract in patients with seasonal rhinitis. Evidence for a dose-response relationship.

Authors:  C André; M Perrin-Fayolle; M Grosclaude; P Couturier; D Basset; J Cornillon; D Piperno; B Girodet; R Sanchez; C Vallon; P Bellier; M Nasr
Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.749

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Decision-making for pediatric allergy immunotherapy for aeroallergens: a narrative review.

Authors:  Miguel Tortajada-Girbés; María Mesa Del Castillo; Helena Larramona; José Manuel Lucas; Montserrat Álvaro Lozano; Ana Isabel Tabar; Begoña Soler López; Ana Martínez-Cañavate
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  The efficacy assessment of a self-administered immunotherapy protocol.

Authors:  Frederick M Schaffer; Larry M Garner; Myla Ebeling; Jeffrey M Adelglass; Thomas C Hulsey; Andrew R Naples
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.858

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.