Literature DB >> 25475500

The otologist's tuning fork examination--are you striking it correctly?

Jayne R Stevens1, Travis J Pfannenstiel2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the manner in which a tuning fork is activated affects its vibrational response. STUDY
DESIGN: Diagnostic test assessment.
SETTING: Hearing Center of Excellence laboratory. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A Polytec OFV-5000 scanning vibrometer was used to measure the vibrational response of 256-Hz, 512-Hz, and 1024-Hz tuning forks after activation. The tuning forks were activated to varying intensities by striking 4 unique surfaces: the head, palm, a metal surface, and a wood table.
RESULTS: The fundamental frequency of the individual tuning fork was the dominant observed frequency in all testing scenarios. Additional nonharmonic frequencies were noted when the 256-Hz and 512-Hz tuning forks were struck off metal and wooden surfaces.
CONCLUSIONS: Additional nonfundamental sound frequencies produced secondary to striking a tuning fork off a metal object or a wooden table could affect clinical tuning fork examination and complicate decisions regarding surgical candidacy. © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2014.

Keywords:  fundamental frequency; scanning vibrometer; tuning fork

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25475500     DOI: 10.1177/0194599814559697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  2 in total

1.  A Review of Adult-Onset Hearing Loss: A Primer for Neurologists.

Authors:  Corinne A Pittman; Bryan K Ward; Carrie L Nieman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.972

2.  The cell phone vibration test: A telemedicine substitute for the tuning fork test.

Authors:  Alex Yang; Robert J Lewis; Nora Watson; Charles A Riley; Anthony M Tolisano
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-09-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.