Robin L Walker1, Guanmin Chen2, Finlay A McAlister3, Norm R C Campbell4, Brenda R Hemmelgarn5, Elijah Dixon6, William Ghali7, Doreen Rabi7, Karen Tu8, Nathalie Jette9, Hude Quan10. 1. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 2. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 3. Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 4. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 5. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 6. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 7. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 8. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 9. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 10. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: hquan@ucalgary.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs) represent an indirect measure of access and quality of community care. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between one ACSC, uncomplicated hypertension, and previous primary care physician (PCP) utilization. METHODS: A cohort of patients with hypertension was identified using administrative databases in Alberta between fiscal years 1994 and 2008. We applied the Canadian Institute for Health Information's case definition to detect patients with uncomplicated hypertension as the most responsible reason for hospitalization and/or Emergency Department (ED) visit. We assessed hypertension-related and all-cause PCP visits. RESULTS: The overall adjusted rate of ACSC hospitalizations and ED visits for uncomplicated hypertension was 7.1 and 13.9 per 10,000 hypertensive patients, respectively. The likelihood of ACSC hospitalization for uncomplicated hypertension was associated with age, household income quintile, region of residence, and Charlson comorbidity status (all P < 0.0001). The adjusted rate of ACSC hospitalizations for uncomplicated hypertension increased from 4.8 per 10,000 hypertensive patients for those without hypertension-related PCP visits before diagnosis to 10.5 per 10,000 hypertensive patients for those with 5 or more hypertension-related PCP visits. The rate of ACSC hospitalizations and/or ED visits for uncomplicated hypertension increased as the number of hypertension-related PCP visits increased even after stratifying according to demographic and clinical characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: As the frequency of hypertension-related PCP visits increased, the rate of ACSC hospitalizations and/or ED visits for uncomplicated hypertension increased. This suggests that ACSC hospitalization for uncomplicated hypertension might not be a particularly good indicator for access to primary care.
BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs) represent an indirect measure of access and quality of community care. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between one ACSC, uncomplicated hypertension, and previous primary care physician (PCP) utilization. METHODS: A cohort of patients with hypertension was identified using administrative databases in Alberta between fiscal years 1994 and 2008. We applied the Canadian Institute for Health Information's case definition to detect patients with uncomplicated hypertension as the most responsible reason for hospitalization and/or Emergency Department (ED) visit. We assessed hypertension-related and all-cause PCP visits. RESULTS: The overall adjusted rate of ACSC hospitalizations and ED visits for uncomplicated hypertension was 7.1 and 13.9 per 10,000 hypertensivepatients, respectively. The likelihood of ACSC hospitalization for uncomplicated hypertension was associated with age, household income quintile, region of residence, and Charlson comorbidity status (all P < 0.0001). The adjusted rate of ACSC hospitalizations for uncomplicated hypertension increased from 4.8 per 10,000 hypertensivepatients for those without hypertension-related PCP visits before diagnosis to 10.5 per 10,000 hypertensivepatients for those with 5 or more hypertension-related PCP visits. The rate of ACSC hospitalizations and/or ED visits for uncomplicated hypertension increased as the number of hypertension-related PCP visits increased even after stratifying according to demographic and clinical characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: As the frequency of hypertension-related PCP visits increased, the rate of ACSC hospitalizations and/or ED visits for uncomplicated hypertension increased. This suggests that ACSC hospitalization for uncomplicated hypertension might not be a particularly good indicator for access to primary care.
Authors: Raj S Padwal; Helen So; Peter W Wood; Finlay A Mcalister; Muzaffar Siddiqui; Colleen M Norris; Tom Jeerakathil; James Stone; Shelley Valaire; Balraj Mann; Pierre Boulanger; Scott W Klarenbach Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2018-12-20 Impact factor: 3.738