Literature DB >> 25475283

Comparative study on the high pressure inactivation behavior of the Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O104:H4 and O157:H7 outbreak strains and a non-pathogenic surrogate.

Kai Reineke1, Robert Sevenich2, Christian Hertwig3, Traute Janßen4, Antje Fröhling3, Dietrich Knorr2, Lothar H Wieler4, Oliver Schlüter3.   

Abstract

Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli strains cause each year thousands of illnesses, which are sometimes accompanied by the hemolytic uremic syndrome, like in the 2011 outbreak in Germany. For preservation thermal pasteurization is commonly used, which can cause unwanted quality changes. To prevent this high pressure treatment is a potential alternative. Within this study, the 2011 outbreak strain O104:H4, an O157:H7 and a non-pathogenic strain (DSM1116) were tested. The cells were treated in buffer (pH 7 and pH 5) and carrot juice (pH 5.1) in a pressure temperature range of 0.1-500 MPa and 20-70 °C. Flow cytometry was used to investigate the pressure impact on cell structures of the strain DSM1116. Both pathogenic strains had a much higher resistance in buffer and carrot juice than the non-pathogenic surrogate. Further, strains cultivated and treated at a lower pH-value showed higher pressure stability, presumably due to variations in the membrane composition. This was confirmed for the strain DSM1116 by flow cytometry. Cells cultivated and treated at pH 5 had a stronger ability to retain their membrane potential but showed higher rates of membrane permeabilization at pressures <200 MPa compared to cells cultivated and treated at pH 7. These cells had the lowest membrane permeabilization rate at around 125 MPa, possibly denoting that variations in the fatty acid composition and membrane fluidity contribute to this stabilization phenomenon.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EHEC; Flow cytometry; High pressure; Inactivation mechanisms; Kinetic modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25475283     DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2014.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0740-0020            Impact factor:   5.516


  5 in total

1.  Fitness of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC)/Enteroaggregative E. coli O104:H4 in Comparison to That of EHEC O157: Survival Studies in Food and In Vitro.

Authors:  Christina Böhnlein; Jan Kabisch; Diana Meske; Charles M A P Franz; Rohtraud Pichner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Public Health Research Resulting from One of the World's Largest Outbreaks Caused by Entero-Hemorrhagic Escherichia coli in Germany 2011: A Review.

Authors:  Elena Köckerling; Laura Karrasch; Aparna Schweitzer; Oliver Razum; Gérard Krause
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-12-11

3.  Quantitative Characteristics of Toxic Compounds According to the Solvent Type.

Authors:  Young-Ji An; Seong-Jin Choi; Yong-Hyun Kim; Kyuhong Lee
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 4.  Mechanisms of pressure-mediated cell death and injury in Escherichia coli: from fundamentals to food applications.

Authors:  Michael Gänzle; Yang Liu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Flow Cytometric Assessment of the Morphological and Physiological Changes of Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli in Response to Natural Antimicrobial Exposure.

Authors:  Giacomo Braschi; Francesca Patrignani; Lorenzo Siroli; Rosalba Lanciotti; Oliver Schlueter; Antje Froehling
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 5.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.