Literature DB >> 25475249

Prognostic implication of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in patients with cardiogenic shock and acute myocardial infarction.

Sarah Ostenfeld1, Matias Greve Lindholm2, Jesper Kjaergaard2, John Bro-Jeppesen2, Jacob Eifer Møller3, Michael Wanscher4, Christian Hassager2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiogenic shock (CS) presenting with and without out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
BACKGROUND: Despite general improvement in outcome after acute MI, CS remains a leading cause of death in acute MI patients with a high 30-day mortality rate. OHCA on top of cardiogenic shock may further increase mortality in these patients resulting in premature withdrawal of supportive therapy, but this is not known. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In a retrospective study from 2008 to 2013, 248 consecutive patients admitted alive to a tertiary centre with the diagnosis of CS and acute MI were enrolled, 118 (48%) presented with OHCA and 130 (52%) without (non-OHCA patients). Mean lactate level at admission was significantly higher in OHCA patients compared with non-OCHA patients (9mmol/l (SD 6) vs. 6mmol/l (SD 4) p<0.0001). Co-morbidities were more prevalent in the non-OHCA group. By univariate analysis age (Hazard ratio (HR)=1.02 [CI 1.00-1.03], p=0.01) and lactate at admission (HR=1.06 [CI 1.03-1.09], p<0.001), but not OHCA (HR=1.1 [CI 0.8-1.4], p=NS) was associated with mortality. In multivariate analysis, only age (HR=1.02 [CI 1.01-1.04], p=0.003) and lactate level at admission (HR=1.06 [1.03-1.09], p<0.001) were independent predictors of mortality. One-week mortality was 63% in the OHCA group and 56% in the non-OHCA group, p=NS.
CONCLUSION: OHCA is not an independent predictor of mortality in patients with acute MI complicated by cardiogenic shock. This should encourage active intensive treatment of CS patients regardless of OHCA.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac arrest; Cardiogenic shock; Ischaemia; Lactate; Mortality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25475249     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  12 in total

Review 1.  Continuous internal counterpulsation as a bridge to recovery in acute and chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Christos D Kontogiannis; Konstantinos Malliaras; Chris J Kapelios; Jay W Mason; John N Nanas
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-03-24

Review 2.  [Guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) on cardiopulmonary resuscitation 2021: update and comments].

Authors:  Guido Michels; Johann Bauersachs; Bernd W Böttiger; Hans-Jörg Busch; Burkhard Dirks; Norbert Frey; Carsten Lott; Nadine Rott; Wolfgang Schöls; P Christian Schulze; Holger Thiele
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Management of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Alexandre Mebazaa; Alain Combes; Sean van Diepen; Alexa Hollinger; Jaon N Katz; Giovanni Landoni; Ludhmila Abrahao Hajjar; Johan Lassus; Guillaume Lebreton; Gilles Montalescot; Jin Joo Park; Susanna Price; Alessandro Sionis; Demetris Yannopolos; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Bruno Levy; Holger Thiele
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  The ENCOURAGE mortality risk score and analysis of long-term outcomes after VA-ECMO for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Grégoire Muller; Erwan Flecher; Guillaume Lebreton; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Jean-Louis Trouillet; Nicolas Bréchot; Matthieu Schmidt; Ciro Mastroianni; Jean Chastre; Pascal Leprince; Amedeo Anselmi; Alain Combes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines 2021: post-resuscitation care.

Authors:  Jerry P Nolan; Claudio Sandroni; Bernd W Böttiger; Alain Cariou; Tobias Cronberg; Hans Friberg; Cornelia Genbrugge; Kirstie Haywood; Gisela Lilja; Véronique R M Moulaert; Nikolaos Nikolaou; Theresa Mariero Olasveengen; Markus B Skrifvars; Fabio Taccone; Jasmeet Soar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  ECMO in cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  L C Napp; C Kühn; J Bauersachs
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 7.  Predictors of Outcomes in Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Deepak Acharya
Journal:  Cardiol Rev       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.644

8.  Incidence of acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock during corona virus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Authors:  M D Lauridsen; J H Butt; L Østergaard; J E Møller; C Hassager; T Gerds; K Kragholm; M Phelps; M Schou; C Torp-Pedersen; G Gislason; L Køber; E L Fosbøl
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2020-10-13

9.  Hemodynamic and metabolic recovery in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock is more rapid among patients presenting with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Jakob Josiassen; Ole Kristian Lerche Helgestad; Jacob Eifer Møller; Jesper Kjaergaard; Henrik Frederiksen Hoejgaard; Henrik Schmidt; Lisette Okkels Jensen; Lene Holmvang; Hanne Berg Ravn; Christian Hassager
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Predictors of Mortality in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction and Resuscitated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Andreea Bărcan; Monica Chițu; Edvin Benedek; Nora Rat; Szilamer Korodi; Mirabela Morariu; Istvan Kovacs
Journal:  J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures)       Date:  2016-02-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.