Literature DB >> 25475045

Monitoring T cell alloreactivity.

Anita Mehrotra1, Jeremy Leventhal1, Carolina Purroy1, Paolo Cravedi2.   

Abstract

Currently, immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients is center-specific, protocol-driven, and adjusted according to functional or histological evaluation of the allograft and/or signs of drug toxicity or infection. As a result, a large fraction of patients receive too much or too little immunosuppression, exposing them to higher rates of infection, malignancy and drug toxicity, or increased risk of acute and chronic graft injury from rejection, respectively. The individualization of immunosuppression requires the development of assays able to reliably quantify and/or predict the magnitude of the recipient's immune response toward the allograft. As alloreactive T cells are central mediators of allograft rejection, monitoring T cell alloreactivity has become a priority for the transplant community. Among available assays, flow cytometry based phenotyping, T cell proliferation, T cell cytokine secretion, and ATP release (ImmuKnow), have been the most thoroughly tested. While numerous cross-sectional studies have found associations between the results of these assays and the presence of clinically relevant post-transplantation outcomes, data from prospective studies are still scanty, thereby preventing widespread implementation in the clinic. Future studies are required to test the hypothesis that tailoring immunosuppression on the basis of results offered by these biomarkers leads to better outcomes than current standard clinical practice.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25475045      PMCID: PMC6697151          DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2014.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Rev (Orlando)        ISSN: 0955-470X            Impact factor:   3.943


  5 in total

1.  A novel approach to measuring cell-mediated lympholysis using quantitative flow and imaging cytometry.

Authors:  G M La Muraglia; M J O'Neil; M L Madariaga; S G Michel; K S Mordecai; J S Allan; J C Madsen; I M Hanekamp; F I Preffer
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Structure-Activity relationship of 1-(Furan-2ylmethyl)Pyrrolidine-Based Stimulation-2 (ST2) inhibitors for treating graft versus host disease.

Authors:  Xinrui Yuan; Hua Jiang; Denggang Fu; Aaron Robida; Krishani Rajanayake; Hebao Yuan; Bo Wen; Duxin Sun; Brennan T Watch; Krishnapriya Chinnaswamy; Jeanne A Stuckey; Sophie Paczesny; Jason C Rech; Chao-Yie Yang
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.461

Review 3.  Immune monitoring as prerequisite for transplantation tolerance trials.

Authors:  K Behnam Sani; B Sawitzki
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  From proteomics to discovery of first-in-class ST2 inhibitors active in vivo.

Authors:  Abdulraouf M Ramadan; Etienne Daguindau; Jason C Rech; Krishnapriya Chinnaswamy; Jilu Zhang; Greg L Hura; Brad Griesenauer; Zachary Bolten; Aaron Robida; Martha Larsen; Jeanne A Stuckey; Chao-Yie Yang; Sophie Paczesny
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2018-07-26

5.  Inhibition of myeloid differentiation factor 88 signaling mediated by histidine-grafted poly(β-amino ester) ester nanovector induces donor-specific liver allograft tolerance.

Authors:  Fanguo Hu; Hanjie Wang; Shuangnan Zhang; Yao Peng; Lin Su; Jin Chang; Gang Liu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-07-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.