Literature DB >> 25474334

Knowledge of exercise prescription guidelines among certified exercise professionals.

Zachary Zenko1, Panteleimon Ekkekakis.   

Abstract

This survey assessed the knowledge of the "Guidance for prescribing exercise" issued by the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) in 2011 among certified exercise professionals. A sample of 1,808 certified exercise professionals (66.70% women, mean (± SD) age = 38.28 ± 12.56 years) responded to electronic invitations. The 11-question online questionnaire assessed knowledge of the recommended frequency, duration, and intensity ranges in terms of heart rate, metabolic equivalents, and ratings of perceived exertion. Respondents had 7.45 ± 8.07 years of work experience and represented all 50 U.S. states. On average, participants answered 42.87 ± 1.69% of the questions correctly. Gender, age, and years of professional experience were not associated with overall knowledge of the guidelines. Likewise, having 1, 2, or 3+ certifications made no difference in overall knowledge. However, there were significant differences between levels of education (F = 7.12, p < 0.001), from 38.72 ± 1.62% for "some college" to 47.01 ± 1.71% for "doctorate." There were also significant differences by primary job role (F = 3.45, p < 0.001) but no category exceeded 49% (e.g., personal trainers: 40.59 ± 1.66%; clinical exercise physiologists: 44.18 ± 1.70%). The respondents rated their knowledge of the exercise prescription guidelines as 7.01 ± 1.69 of 10 but rated the level of knowledge necessary to practice safely and effectively as 8.32 ± 1.64 (t = 28.60, p < 0.001). This survey, the first at this scale to investigate the knowledge of exercise prescription guidelines among certified exercise professionals, showed that there is room for improvement, considering that the average score was below 50%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25474334     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

Review 1.  The Development of ICT-Based Exercise Rehabilitation Service Contents for Patients with Musculoskeletal Disorders and Stroke.

Authors:  Jiyoun Kim; Jiyeon Song; Donguk Kim; Jinho Park
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Cardiorespiratory and metabolic determinants during moderate and high resistance exercise intensities until exhaustion using dynamic leg press: comparison with critical load.

Authors:  V M Arakelian; C L Goulart; R G Mendes; F C Caruso; V Baldissera; R Arena; A Borghi-Silva
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 2.590

3.  A structured workshop enhanced Physiotherapists' skills in clinical decision-making: A pre-post study.

Authors:  Shambhu P Adhikari; Nistha Shrestha; Rishita Shakya; Rajani Phuyal; Manju Gyawali; Rubee Dev
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-11-30

4.  Identifying priorities for sport and physical activity research in Canada: an iterative priority-setting study.

Authors:  Mathieu Bélanger; Julie Goguen Carpenter; Catherine M Sabiston; Leigh M Vanderloo; Carolyn Trono; François Gallant; Véronique Thibault; Isabelle Doré; Jennifer O'Loughlin
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2022-03-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.