Literature DB >> 25473857

The art of misunderstanding moral bioenhancement.

Ingmar Persson, Julian Savulescu.   

Abstract

In our book Unfit for the Future and a number of papers, we have argued that there is a dangerous mismatch between, on the one hand, the tremendous power of scientific technology, which has created societies with millions of citizens, and, on the other hand, our moral capacities, which have been shaped by evolution for life in small, close-knit societies with primitive technology. To overcome this mismatch before it results in the downfall of human civilization, human beings stand in acute need of moral enhancement, not only by traditional means but also by biomedical means, should this turn out to be possible. After summarizing this argument, we respond to two critics, Michael Hauskeller and Robert Sparrow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25473857     DOI: 10.1017/S0963180114000292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics        ISSN: 0963-1801            Impact factor:   1.284


  4 in total

Review 1.  Moral Enhancement Using Non-invasive Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  R Ryan Darby; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Moral Bio-enhancement, Freedom, Value and the Parity Principle.

Authors:  Jonathan Pugh
Journal:  Topoi (Dordr)       Date:  2017-04-12

3.  The duty to be morally enhanced.

Authors:  Ingmar Persson; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Topoi (Dordr)       Date:  2017-04-12

4.  Public Attitudes Towards Moral Enhancement. Evidence that Means Matter Morally.

Authors:  Jona Specker; Maartje H N Schermer; Peter B Reiner
Journal:  Neuroethics       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 1.480

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.