| Literature DB >> 25473490 |
Peter N Gichuhi1, Kokoasse Kpomblekou-A2, Adelia C Bovell-Benjamin1.
Abstract
Organic farming has been on an upward trend in recent years. However, the manures used like broiler litter have variable nutrient content, making it important to establish optimal application rate, for maximum crop yield and quality. Additionally, some states like Alabama restricts the amount of broiler litter to control excessive nutrients accumulation which can lead to surface and ground water contamination. The current study evaluated the effect of broiler litter at rates 0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 t ha(-1) (treatments T0, T0.5, T1, T2, and T3), on the nutritional and physical properties of Beauregard sweet potato. Analyses were performed to determine moisture, ash, fiber, vitamin C, and β-carotene contents using oven, muffler furnace, dye, and spectrophotometric methods; texture; and color using compressive strength and L, a, b system, respectively. Ash content of the samples ranged from 0.9% to 1.4% with a very strong positive linear correlation (r = 0.9) to the broiler litter rate. However, vitamin C had a quadratic relationship with the broiler litter rate with a peaking at T0.5 (15.5 mg/100 g). The yellow color (b-value) also had a strong linear relationship with the broiler litter rate (r = 0.86). However, the other measures showed moderate, weak, or negligible correlations to the broiler litter level. T0.5 had the highest β-carotene (262.0 μg/g), dry matter contents and had the most firm (0.040 kN) sweet potatoes with the deepest orange color (L = 60.7). Based on the study's findings, 0.5 t ha(-1) appeared to be appropriate level of broiler litter, which is consistent with Alabama's law and is also advantageous in terms of low cost of farming practices and water pollution reduction.Entities:
Keywords: Beauregard sweet potato; broiler litter; manure application rate; nutrition
Year: 2014 PMID: 25473490 PMCID: PMC4221831 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Selected properties of the broiler litter used
| Inorganic N (g kg−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | Organic C (g kg−1) | Total N (g kg−1) | NH4+-N | NO3−-N + NO2−-N |
| 8.5 | 290 | 46 | 3.03 | 1.57 |
Moisture, fiber, and β-carotene contents of the sweet potato under the different treatments
| Treament | Moisture (%) | Fiber (%) | p-Carotene ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 77.92 ± 0.14ab | 0.95 ± 0.02ab | 178.0 ± 28.5C |
| T0.5 | 76.98 ± 0.34c | 0.89 ± O.06b | 263.0 ± 18.7a |
| T1 | 77.19 ± 1.01bc | 0.95 ± 0.05ab | 139.0 ± 40.0C |
| T2 | 78.58 ± 0.15a | 0.91 ± 0.02ab | 191.2 ± 9.9bc |
| T3 | 77.84 ± 0.25ab | 0.99 ± 0.05a | 238.3 ± 25.3ab |
Values on the same column with similar letters are not significantly different (P < 0.05). T0, T0.5, T1, T2, T3 refer to treatments and the subscripts represent tons of broiler litter applied.
Linear correlation between sweet potato measure and the rate (t ha−1)
| Color | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analysis | Moisture | Ash | Fiber | Texture | Vitamin C | ||||
| Correlation coefficient ( | 0.4230 | 0.9019 | 0.4686 | −0.2020 | −0.1833 | 0.2338 | 0.0637 | 0.1579 | 0.8563 |
Figure 1Ash content of the sweet potatoes growth with different amount of broiler litter.
Figure 2Vitamin C content of the sweet potatoes growth with different amounts of broiler litter.
Figure 3Quadratic relationship between the vitamin C content of the sweet potato and the rate of broiler litter (t ha−1) applied.
Texture of the sweet potatoes grown with the different amount of broiler litter manure
| Treatment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | T0.5 | T1 | T2 | T3 | |
| Firmness (kN) | 0.033 ± 0.006b | 0.040 ± 0.004a | 0.037 ± 0.004ab | 0.034 ± 0.001ab | 0.035 ± 0.003ab |
Values on the same row with similar letters are not significantly different (P < 0.05). T0, T0.5, T1, T2, T3 refer to treatments and the subscripts represent tons of broiler litter applied.
Figure 4Linear correlation between firmness and moisture content of the sweet potatoes.
Color values of the sweet potatoes grown with the different amounts of broiler litter
| Treatment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 61.71 ± 0.18bc | 20.24 ± 0.20a | 23.33 ± 0.34b |
| T0.5 | 60.73 ± 0.32c | 19.85 ± 0.25a | 22.12 ± 0.47c |
| T1 | 63.37 ± 0.44a | 20.67 ± 0.23a | 24.73 ± 0.57a |
| T2 | 62.19 ± 0.049b | 20.34 ± 0.56a | 23.32 ± 0.65b |
| T3 | 61.52 ± 1.09bc | 20.1 ± 0.77a | 24.71 ± 0.43a |
Values on the same column with similar letters are not significantly different (P < 0.05). T0, T0.5, T1, T2, T3 refer to treatments and the subscripts represent tons of broiler litter applied.
Figure 5Correlation between the β-carotene content and color L-value of the sweet potato treatments.