| Literature DB >> 25473445 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Severe injuries in skeletal muscle result in muscle weakness that delays recovery and contribute to progressive decline in muscle function. Microcurrent therapy (MCT) is a novel treatment method used in soft tissue injury and tissue regeneration therapy. The regenerative capacity of skeletal muscle tissue resides in satellite cells, the quiescent adult stem cells. AIM: The present work aimed at investigating the relation between microcurrent therapy and local stem cells in regeneration of induced skeletal muscle injury in albino rat.Entities:
Keywords: Injury; Microcurrent; Satellite cells; Skeletal muscle
Year: 2014 PMID: 25473445 PMCID: PMC4249907 DOI: 10.15283/ijsc.2014.7.2.79
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Stem Cells ISSN: 2005-3606 Impact factor: 2.500
Fig. 1.(A) Skeletal muscle section of S group showing longitudinal muscle fibers (arrows) (H&E, ×200). (B) Higher magnification of the previous figure showing oval pale nuclei (N) and transverse striations (S) in the sarcoplasm (H&E, ×400).
Fig. 2.(A) Skeletal muscle section of a rat in subgroup I1 showing atypical fibers (arrows) widely separated by infiltrating cells (arrowheads). Most fibers exhibit dark nuclei (*). Note a distended capillary (c) (H&E, ×200). (B) Higher magnification of the previous figure showing two fibers with partial loss of striations (arrows), one fiber exhibits strong acidophilic sarcoplasm (arrowheads) with focal vacuolations (v) (H&E, ×400).
Fig. 3.(A) Skeletal muscle section of a rat in subgroup I2 showing atypical fibers (arrows) separated by few infiltrating cells (arrowhead). Some fibers exhibit dark nuclei (*) (H&E, ×200). (B) Higher magnification of the previous figure showing some fibers with partial loss of striations (arrows) (H&E, ×400).
Fig. 4.(A) Skeletal muscle section of a rat in subgroup M1 showing some fibers exhibiting flat nuclei (thin arrows). Some of the nuclei (n) are centrally located. Note few atypical fibers (thick arrow) (H&E, ×200). (B) Higher magnification of the previous figure showing fibers with striations in some areas of the sarcoplasm (arrows) (H&E, ×400).
Fig. 5.(A) Skeletal muscle section of a rat in subgroup M2 showing few atypical (arrow) and multiple typical fibers, some of which with centrally located nuclei (n) (H&E, ×200). (B) Higher magnification of the previous figure showing multiple fibers with striations (S) in most areas of the sarcoplasm. Note some fibers with centrally located nuclei (n) (H&E, ×400).
Fig. 6.(A) Skeletal muscle section of a control rat showing few alpha smooth muscle actin (α SMA) +ve spindle cells (arrows) in between skeletal muscle fibers (arrowheads) (α SMA immunostaining, ×400). (B) Skeletal muscle section of a rat in subgroup I1 showing α SMA +ve spindle cells (arrows) lining 2 blood vessels. Note atypical muscle fibers (arrowheads) (α SMA immunostaining, ×400). (C) Skeletal muscle section of a rat in subgroup I2 showing few α SMA +ve spindle cells (arrows) among some fibers with partial loss of striations (arrowheads) (α SMA immunostaining, ×400). (D) Skeletal muscle section of a rat in subgroup M1 showing some α SMA +ve spindle cells (arrows) among some muscle fibers with centrally located nuclei (arrowheads) (α SMA immunostaining, ×400). (E) Skeletal muscle section of a rat in subgroup M2 showing multiple α SMA +ve spindle cells (arrows) among muscle fibers with striations in most areas of sarcoplasm (arrowheads) (α SMA immunostaining, ×400).
Fig. 7.(A) Skeletal muscle section of a control rat showing few CD34+ve spindle cells (arrows) at the periphery of the fibers (CD34 immunostaining, ×400). (B) Skeletal muscle section of a rat in subgroup I1 showing a +ve oval (curved arrow) and a +ve spindle (arrow) cells around atypical fibers (CD34 immunostaining, ×400). (C) Skeletal muscle section of a rat in subgroup I2 showing few +ve spindle cells (arrows) at the periphery of the fibers (CD34 immunostaining, ×400). (D) Skeletal muscle section of a rat in subgroup M1 showing multiple +ve spindle cells (arrows) at the periphery of the fibers. Note centrally located nuclei (n) (CD34 immunostaining, ×400). (E) Skeletal muscle section of a rat in subgroup M2 showing some +ve spindle cells (arrows) at the periphery of the fibers (CD34 immunostaining, ×400).
Mean area of atypical fibers, mean area% of alpha SMA +ve cells and mean area% of CD34 +ve cells in control and experimental subgroups
| Groups and Subgroups | Mean area of atypical fibers | Mean area% of alpha SMA +ve cells | Mean area% of CD34+ve cells |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | - | 0.98±0.25 | 0.81±0.19 |
| Subgroup I1 | 86.74±9.27 | 1.99±0.35 | 0.79±0.20 |
| Subgroup I2 | 243.38±9.69 | 3.29±1.01 | 1.62±0.47 |
| Subgroup M1 | 41.74±10.57 | 5.67±0.43 | 7.77±0.63 |
| Subgroup M2 | 13.62±3.39 | 9.61±1.17 | 3.95±0.26 |
significant compared to control group and subgroups I1, I2.
significant compared to control group 1 and subgroups I1, I2, M1.
significant compared to control group and subgroups I1, I2.
significant compared to control group and subgroups I1, I2, M1.
significant compared to control group and subgroups I1, I2.
significant compared to control group and subgroups I1, I2, M2.