Literature DB >> 25473327

Study on requirements of bioequivalence for registration of pharmaceutical products in USA, Europe and Canada.

Upendra C Galgatte1, Vijay R Jamdade1, Pravin P Aute1, Pravin D Chaudhari1.   

Abstract

The present study was aimed to study the requirements of bioequivalence for the registration of pharmaceutical products in the USA, Europe and Canada. Before going into bioequivalence studies it is essential for the pharmaceutical industry to study the guidelines of bioequivalence for the respective country where the industry wants to market its products and thus enter into generic market. This study reviews the requirements of bioequivalence with study parameters such as study design, fasting or fed state studies, volunteers recruitment, study dose, sampling points, analytical method validation parameters, moieties to be measured in plasma, pharmacokinetic parameters, criteria for bioequivalence, GCP requirements etc, which are needed for the pharmaceutical industry to carry out bioequivalence studies and to file ANDA. Test products and reference products are needed for this study. Test products are usually manufactured by a sponsor and reference products are provided by the government laboratories of the respective countries. Sampling points also vary with respect to the regulatory guidelines of these countries. All these countries follow ICH GCP guidelines. The criterion of bioequivalence for these countries is 90% CI 80-125% for C max, AUC t , AUC0-∞.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioavailability; Bioequivalence; Pharmacokinetics

Year:  2013        PMID: 25473327      PMCID: PMC4246407          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2013.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi Pharm J        ISSN: 1319-0164            Impact factor:   4.330


  11 in total

1.  Investigation on the need of multiple dose bioequivalence studies for prolonged-release generic products.

Authors:  Alfredo García-Arieta; Susana Morales-Alcelay; Marta Herranz; José María de la Torre-Alvarado; Antonio Blázquez-Pérez; Ma Luisa Suárez-Gea; Covadonga Alvarez
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 5.875

Review 2.  The development and registration of topical pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Christopher J Mugglestone; Segundo Mariz; Majella E Lane
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 5.875

3.  Differences in the in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic profiles of once-daily modified-release methylphenidate formulations in Canada: examination of current bioequivalence criteria.

Authors:  Megan J Shram; Anne Marie Quinn; Nancy Chen; Janice Faulknor; Doanh Luong; Edward M Sellers; Laszlo Endrenyi
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.393

4.  Harmonization of regulatory approaches for evaluating therapeutic equivalence and interchangeability of multisource drug products: workshop summary report.

Authors:  Mei-Ling Chen; Vinod P Shah; Daan J Crommelin; Leon Shargel; Dennis Bashaw; Masood Bhatti; Henning Blume; Jennifer Dressman; Murray Ducharme; Paul Fackler; Terry Hyslop; Lorelei Lutter; Jose Morais; Eric Ormsby; Saji Thomas; Yu Chung Tsang; Raja Velagapudi; Lawrence X Yu
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 5.  Bioequivalence; its history, practice, and future.

Authors:  Kamal K Midha; Gordon McKay
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 6.  Bioequivalence requirements for generic products.

Authors:  R L Nation; L N Sansom
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1994 Apr-May       Impact factor: 12.310

7.  The therapeutic equivalence of complex drugs.

Authors:  Huub Schellekens; Ety Klinger; Stefan Mühlebach; Jean-Francois Brin; Gert Storm; Daan J A Crommelin
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 8.  The bioequivalence and therapeutic efficacy of generic versus brand-name psychoactive drugs.

Authors:  Giuseppe Borgheini
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.393

9.  Bioequivalence and other unresolved issues in generic drug substitution.

Authors:  Peter Meredith
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.393

10.  Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, efficacy, and safety data from two randomized, double-blind studies in patients with asthma and an in vitro study comparing two dry-powder inhalers delivering a combination of salmeterol 50 microg and fluticasone propionate 250 microg: implications for establishing bioequivalence of inhaled products.

Authors:  Peter T Daley-Yates; David A Parkins; Marian J Thomas; Benjamin Gillett; Karen W House; Hector G Ortega
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.393

View more
  13 in total

1.  Bioequivalence Between Generic and Branded Lamotrigine in People With Epilepsy: The EQUIGEN Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Michel Berg; Timothy E Welty; Barry E Gidal; Francisco J Diaz; Ron Krebill; Jerzy P Szaflarski; Barbara A Dworetzky; John R Pollard; Edmund J Elder; Wenlei Jiang; Xiaohui Jiang; Regina D Switzer; Michael D Privitera
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 18.302

2.  Evaluation of Bioequivalence of Two Long-Acting 20% Oxytetracycline Formulations in Pigs.

Authors:  Zhixin Lei; Qianying Liu; Bing Yang; Saeed Ahmed; Jincheng Xiong; Tingting Song; Pin Chen; Jiyue Cao; Qigai He
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-05-01

3.  Main Reasons for Registration Application Refusal of Generic and Similar Pharmaceutical Drug Products by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA).

Authors:  Ana Cerúlia Moraes do Carmo; Stefânia Schimaneski Piras; Nayrton Flávio Moura Rocha; Tais Gratieri
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Reviewing the role of healthy volunteer studies in drug development.

Authors:  Joyson J Karakunnel; Nam Bui; Latha Palaniappan; Keith T Schmidt; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Briggs Morrison; William D Figg; Shivaani Kummar
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 5.531

5.  Withdrawal of two generic clopidogrel products in Saudi Arabia for non-bio-equivalence.

Authors:  Abdullah Saleh Alsultan; Hakeam Abdulaziz Hakeam
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.526

6.  Comparison of the Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationships of Two Darbepoetin Alfa Formulations in Healthy Male Volunteers.

Authors:  Seokuee Kim; Taegon Hong; Jae-Wook Ko; Wooseong Huh; Jung-Ryul Kim
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 5.807

7.  Evaluation of Marbofloxacin in Beagle Dogs After Oral Dosing: Preclinical Safety Evaluation and Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Two Different Tablets.

Authors:  Zhixin Lei; Qianying Liu; Bing Yang; Haseeb Khaliq; Saeed Ahmed; Bowen Fan; Jiyue Cao; Qigai He
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability Study of a Prednisolone Tablet as a Single Oral Dose in Bangladeshi Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Tafsir Bashar; Mohd Nazmul Hasan Apu; Md Shaki Mostaid; Md Saiful Islam; Abul Hasnat
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Bioequivalence of Ultra Rapid Lispro (URLi) U100 and U200 Formulations in Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Helle Linnebjerg; Elizabeth Smith LaBell; Mary Anne Dellva; David E Coutant; Jennifer Leohr
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 2.945

Review 10.  In Vitro Dissolution and in Silico Modeling Shortcuts in Bioequivalence Testing.

Authors:  Moawia M Al-Tabakha; Muaed J Alomar
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 6.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.