Literature DB >> 25473130

Invasive prenatal genetic testing: A Catholic healthcare provider's perspective.

Jay J Bringman1.   

Abstract

Invasive prenatal testing is performed for a variety of reasons, but the most common indication is for genetic testing of the fetus. Although many times the information obtained from this type of testing results in selective termination of fetuses with genetic diagnoses, the information itself may be morally neutral. Should a Catholic healthcare provider be willing to perform invasive prenatal testing in the setting of uncertainty with respect to the patient's plans following a diagnosis of a genetic abnormality?

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amniocentesis; Catholic bioethics; Chorionic villus sampling; Invasive prenatal testing

Year:  2014        PMID: 25473130      PMCID: PMC4240054          DOI: 10.1179/2050854914Y.0000000022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Linacre Q        ISSN: 0024-3639


  13 in total

1.  Impact of prenatal diagnosis on livebirth prevalence of children with congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Claude Stoll; Y Alembik; B Dott; M P Roth
Journal:  Ann Genet       Date:  2002 Jul-Sep

2.  The antenatal prediction of haemolytic disease of the newborn.

Authors:  D C BEVIS
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1952-02-23       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Antenatal detection of hereditary disorders.

Authors:  H L Nadler
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Alpha-fetoprotein in the antenatal diagnosis of anencephaly and spina bifida.

Authors:  D J Brock; R G Sutcliffe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1972-07-29       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  The prenatal diagnosis of inborn errors of metabolism.

Authors:  A Milunsky; J W Littlefield
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 13.739

6.  Lecithin-sphingomyelin ratios in amniotic fluid in normal and abnormal pregnancy.

Authors:  L Gluck; M V Kulovich
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1973-02-15       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Having a son or daughter with Down syndrome: perspectives from mothers and fathers.

Authors:  Brian G Skotko; Susan P Levine; Richard Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Self-perceptions from people with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Brian G Skotko; Susan P Levine; Richard Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Trends in congenital malformations, 1974-1999: effect of prenatal diagnosis and elective termination.

Authors:  Allyson J Peller; Marie-Noel Westgate; Lewis B Holmes
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis.

Authors:  Keith A Eddleman; Fergal D Malone; Lisa Sullivan; Kim Dukes; Richard L Berkowitz; Yara Kharbutli; T Flint Porter; David A Luthy; Christine H Comstock; George R Saade; Susan Klugman; Lorraine Dugoff; Sabrina D Craigo; Ilan E Timor-Tritsch; Stephen R Carr; Honor M Wolfe; Mary E D'Alton
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Recent trends in prenatal genetic screening and testing.

Authors:  Ondrej Pös; Jaroslav Budiš; Tomáš Szemes
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-05-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.