Literature DB >> 25472978

Is uniport thoracoscopic surgery less painful than multiple port approaches?

Rebekah Young1, Philip McElnay2, Rebecca Leslie3, Douglas West4.   

Abstract

A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was 'In patients undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS), does a uniport (single-port) or multiport technique convey benefit in terms of postoperative pain?' Altogether, 255 papers were found using the reported search, of which 12 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studies, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these tables are tabulated. All the available evidence is from small, non-randomized studies. Many were retrospective and methodologically weak. Most studied minor thoracic surgical procedures and a few compare the two approaches in major pulmonary resections. One of the studies compared pain at 24 h for uniport [mean Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) >4.4] and three-port VATS (mean VAS 6.2), for different procedures including lung biopsy and surgery for pneumothorax (P = 0.035). Another study compared pain in the first 36-h post-sympathectomy and found mean pain scores of 0.8 in the uniport group and 1.2 in the two-port group (P = 0.025). Six studies exclusively compared the VAS between uniport and three-port VATS for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Two studies found no significant difference in pain scores and four found a statistically significant reduction in early postoperative pain scores. One study found that pain scores were similar for lung volume reduction surgery. Two studies compared the mean VAS and morphine use between uniportal and multiportal lobectomies; however, there were no statistically significant differences. From the papers identified in our search, we conclude that uniport VATS may have a small clinical effect in reducing postoperative pain, with the majority of papers looking at the first 72 h following surgery. Often the VAS score was only improved in the uniport patients by 1-2 points, and the studies did not find statistically significant results throughout their investigations, especially when looking at follow-up pain scores. Around one-third of the chosen papers did not find any statistically significant results. Further studies are needed before single-port can be recommended as less painful than multiport thoracoscopic surgery.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analgesia; Outcome assessment; Thoracic surgery; Video-assisted

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25472978     DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivu391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  25 in total

1.  Management of acute postoperative pain with continuous intercostal nerve block after single port video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomic resection.

Authors:  Ming-Ju Hsieh; Kuo-Cheng Wang; Hung-Pin Liu; Diego Gonzalez-Rivas; Ching-Yang Wu; Yun-Hen Liu; Yi-Cheng Wu; Yin-Kai Chao; Ching-Feng Wu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Uniportal and three-portal video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: analysis of the Italian video-assisted thoracic surgery group database.

Authors:  Davide Tosi; Mario Nosotti; Gianluca Bonitta; Alessandra Mazzucco; Ilaria Righi; Paolo Mendogni; Lorenzo Rosso; Alessandro Palleschi; Gaetano Rocco; Roberto Crisci
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-11-01

3.  Does 11.5 mm guided single port surgery has clinical advantage than multi-port thoracoscopic surgery in spontaneous pneumothorax?

Authors:  Hyun Woo Jeon; Young-Du Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Global development and current evidence of uniportal thoracoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Cheng-Che Tu; Po-Kuei Hsu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Future study direction on single port (uniportal) VATS.

Authors:  Raffaele Rocco; Gaetano Rocco
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Management of post-operative pain by placement of an intraoperative intercostal catheter after single port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a propensity-score matched study.

Authors:  Ching-Feng Wu; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Hung-Pin Liu; Diego Gonzalez-Rivas; Yun-Hen Liu; Yi-Cheng Wu; Yin-Kai Chao; Ching-Yang Wu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Recent developments in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for pulmonary nodule management.

Authors:  Simon C Y Chow; Calvin S H Ng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Why should we prefer the single port access thoracic surgery?

Authors:  Luca Bertolaccini; Alberto Terzi; Andrea Viti
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2016-03-11

9.  Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a promising surgical method.

Authors:  Su Yang; Hecheng Li
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Thoracoscopic surgery via a single-incision subxiphoid approach is associated with less postoperative pain than single-incision transthoracic or three-incision transthoracic approaches for spontaneous pneumothorax.

Authors:  Bing-Yen Wang; Yin-Chun Chang; Yih-Chen Chang; Kung-Min Wang; Ching-Hsiung Lin; Sheng-Hao Lin; Wei-Cheng Lin
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.