J Lawton1, N Waugh2, K D Barnard3, K Noyes4, J Harden1, J Stephen5, J McDowell6, D Rankin1. 1. Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh. 2. Health Sciences, Division of Health Sciences Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry. 3. Human Development and Health, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton. 4. Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh. 5. Child Health Department, Borders General Hospital, Melrose. 6. Nursing and Health Care School, School of Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Abstract
AIMS: To explore the difficulties parents encounter in trying to achieve clinically recommended blood glucose levels and how they could be better supported to optimize their child's glycaemic control. METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted with 54 parents of children with Type 1 diabetes (≤ 12 years). Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Parents described being reluctant and finding it difficult to keep their child's blood glucose levels consistently within clinically recommended ranges. As well as worrying about their child's ability to detect/report hypoglycaemia, parents highlighted a multitude of factors that had an impact on their child's blood glucose levels and over which they could exercise little control. These included: leaving their child with other caregivers who could not be trusted to detect hypoglycaemia; difficulties remotely monitoring and regulating their child's food consumption and activity; and physical and social changes accompanying childhood development. Most parents used two sets of blood glucose targets, with clinically recommended targets employed when their child was in their immediate care and higher targets when in the care of others. Parents described health professionals as lacking understanding of the difficulties they encountered keeping blood glucose within target ranges and needing more empathetic, tailored and realistic advice. CONCLUSION: It is not parents' fear of hypoglycaemia in isolation that leads to decisions to raise their child's blood glucose but, rather, parental fear in conjunction with other factors and considerations. Hence, to improve diabetes management in children, these factors may need to be addressed; for instance, by training others in diabetes management and using new technologies. Changes to consultations are also recommended.
AIMS: To explore the difficulties parents encounter in trying to achieve clinically recommended blood glucose levels and how they could be better supported to optimize their child's glycaemic control. METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted with 54 parents of children with Type 1 diabetes (≤ 12 years). Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Parents described being reluctant and finding it difficult to keep their child's blood glucose levels consistently within clinically recommended ranges. As well as worrying about their child's ability to detect/report hypoglycaemia, parents highlighted a multitude of factors that had an impact on their child's blood glucose levels and over which they could exercise little control. These included: leaving their child with other caregivers who could not be trusted to detect hypoglycaemia; difficulties remotely monitoring and regulating their child's food consumption and activity; and physical and social changes accompanying childhood development. Most parents used two sets of blood glucose targets, with clinically recommended targets employed when their child was in their immediate care and higher targets when in the care of others. Parents described health professionals as lacking understanding of the difficulties they encountered keeping blood glucose within target ranges and needing more empathetic, tailored and realistic advice. CONCLUSION: It is not parents' fear of hypoglycaemia in isolation that leads to decisions to raise their child's blood glucose but, rather, parental fear in conjunction with other factors and considerations. Hence, to improve diabetes management in children, these factors may need to be addressed; for instance, by training others in diabetes management and using new technologies. Changes to consultations are also recommended.
Authors: Jennifer F Waljee; David C Cron; Rena M Steiger; Lin Zhong; Michael J Englesbe; Chad M Brummett Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Maria J Redondo; Chishinga S Callender; Caroline Gonynor; Dora Cantu; Karen W Cullen; Barbara Anderson; Debbe Thompson Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2017-05-16 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Julia Lawton; Norman Waugh; Kathryn Noyes; Kathryn Barnard; Jeni Harden; Louise Bath; John Stephen; David Rankin Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Julia Lawton; Maxine Blackburn; David Rankin; Janet M Allen; Fiona M Campbell; Lalantha Leelarathna; Martin Tauschmann; Hood Thabit; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Daniela Elleri; Roman Hovorka Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2019-02-05 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: N H Birkebaek; A K Drivvoll; K Aakeson; R Bjarnason; A Johansen; U Samuelsson; T Skrivarhaug; A V Thorsson; J Svensson Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2017-05-29
Authors: J Lawton; M Blackburn; J Allen; F Campbell; D Elleri; L Leelarathna; D Rankin; M Tauschmann; H Thabit; R Hovorka Journal: BMC Endocr Disord Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 2.763