BACKGROUND: The efficacy of heparin-bridging therapy during the initiation of oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and the safety of heparin-bridging therapy during OAC initiation in NVAF patients. PATIENTS/ METHODS: This study included 5327 consecutive warfarin-naïve NVAF patients who received OAC that was initiated with (n = 1053) or without (n = 4274) heparin bridging at four tertiary hospitals. Stroke and bleeding events within 30 days of OAC were evaluated. RESULTS: While there was no difference in the incidence of stroke (0.5% vs. 0.3%, P = 0.381), major bleeding rate (0.9% vs. 0.3%, P = 0.004) was higher in heparin-bridged than in non-bridged patients. This trend remained in the propensity score-matched population (stroke 0.5% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.762; major bleeding 0.8% vs. 0.1%, P = 0.019). A high CHA2 DS2 -VASc score was an independent predictor for stroke, whereas bridging therapy had no beneficial effect in preventing stroke regardless of CHADS2 or CHA2 DS2 -VASc scores. The HAS-BLED score had a predictive value for major bleeding (odds ratio 1.80, 95% confidence interval 1.11-2.92, P = 0.018), and heparin-bridging therapy was associated with a higher major bleeding rate (odds ratio 4.44, 95% confidence interval 1.68-11.72, P = 0.003), especially in patients with a HAS-BLED score of ≥ 1. CONCLUSIONS: The heparin-bridging therapy increased bleeding without the benefit of preventing stroke at the initiation of OAC in NVAF. Our data suggest that heparin bridging should not be considered at the initiation of OAC in NVAF patients.
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of heparin-bridging therapy during the initiation of oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and the safety of heparin-bridging therapy during OAC initiation in NVAF patients. PATIENTS/ METHODS: This study included 5327 consecutive warfarin-naïve NVAF patients who received OAC that was initiated with (n = 1053) or without (n = 4274) heparin bridging at four tertiary hospitals. Stroke and bleeding events within 30 days of OAC were evaluated. RESULTS: While there was no difference in the incidence of stroke (0.5% vs. 0.3%, P = 0.381), major bleeding rate (0.9% vs. 0.3%, P = 0.004) was higher in heparin-bridged than in non-bridged patients. This trend remained in the propensity score-matched population (stroke 0.5% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.762; major bleeding 0.8% vs. 0.1%, P = 0.019). A high CHA2 DS2 -VASc score was an independent predictor for stroke, whereas bridging therapy had no beneficial effect in preventing stroke regardless of CHADS2 or CHA2 DS2 -VASc scores. The HAS-BLED score had a predictive value for major bleeding (odds ratio 1.80, 95% confidence interval 1.11-2.92, P = 0.018), and heparin-bridging therapy was associated with a higher major bleeding rate (odds ratio 4.44, 95% confidence interval 1.68-11.72, P = 0.003), especially in patients with a HAS-BLED score of ≥ 1. CONCLUSIONS: The heparin-bridging therapy increased bleeding without the benefit of preventing stroke at the initiation of OAC in NVAF. Our data suggest that heparin bridging should not be considered at the initiation of OAC in NVAF patients.
Authors: Jacob E Kurlander; Geoffrey D Barnes; Michelle A Anderson; Brian Haymart; Eva Kline-Rogers; Scott Kaatz; Sameer D Saini; Sarah L Krein; Caroline R Richardson; James B Froehlich Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 2.300
Authors: Syed Mustajab Hasan; Mohammed Faluk; Ramy Abdelmaseih; Jay D Patel; Ravi Thakker; Jay J Chacko; Dewid Zayas; Alexis Finer; Aiham Albaeni; Khalid Abusaada Journal: Cardiol Res Date: 2021-07-09