| Literature DB >> 25472653 |
Taylor B Engle1, Erin E Jobman2, Timothy W Moural3,4, Autumn M McKnite5, Justin W Bundy6, Sarah Y Barnes7, Emily H Davis8, Judith A Galeota9, Thomas E Burkey10, Graham S Plastow11, Stephen D Kachman12, Daniel C Ciobanu13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Porcine circovirus 2 is the primary agent responsible for inducing a group of associated diseases known as Porcine Circovirus Associated Diseases (PCVAD), which can have detrimental effects on production efficiency as well as causing significant mortality. The objective of this study was to evaluate variation in viral replication, immune response and growth across pigs (n = 974) from different crossbred lines. The approach used in this study was experimental infection with a PCV2b strain of pigs at an average of 43 days of age.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25472653 PMCID: PMC4264338 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-014-0286-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Proportion (%) of the specific Swine leukocyte antigen ( ) haplotypes in UNL PCV2-challenged resource population and other populations of outbred pigs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 5.6 | 9.6 | 17.2 | 23.5 | 4.2 |
|
| 13.0 | 45.2 | 30.1 | 43.9 | 25.0 |
|
| 11.1 | 6.7 | 3.2 | 6.1 | 16.7 |
|
| 5.6 | 6.7 | 31.2 | ||
|
| 11.1 | 7.7 | 3.1 | ||
|
| 13.0 | 14.0 | |||
|
| 27.8 | 14.4 | 2.7 | 18.4 | |
|
| 3.7 | 3.8 | 5.1 | 54.2 | |
|
| 9.3 | 5.8 | 1.6 |
1Determined by sequencing the coding region of the DQB1 gene in pigs representing all batches.
2Data from Ho et al. (2010); PCV, porcine circovirus; KSU, Kansas State University; MY, Meishan x Yorkshire cross.
Figure 1The influence of dam parity (X) on the level of passive IgG (Y) in experimental piglets. Concentration of passive IgG tended to increase in piglets generated by older dams (> 4 parities, P > 0.27).
Means and standard deviations (SD) of the indicator traits of PCVAD susceptibility following an experimental infection with PCV2b
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ADG wk1 (kg) | 0.37 | 0.10 |
| ADG wk2 (kg) | 0.45 | 0.13 |
| ADG wk3 (kg) | 0.48 | 0.17 |
| ADG wk4 (kg) | 0.58 | 0.18 |
| ADG 0–28 d | 0.47 | 0.10 |
| Viremia d 7* | 1.42 | 0.62 |
| Viremia d 14* | 3.59 | 0.76 |
| Viremia d 21* | 3.34 | 0.78 |
| Viremia d 28* | 2.63 | 0.75 |
| IgM d 7 | 0.59 | 0.07 |
| IgM d 14 | 1.18 | 0.32 |
| IgM d 21 | 1.45 | 0.46 |
| IgM d 28 | 1.16 | 0.40 |
| IgG d 7 | 0.73 | 0.10 |
| IgG d 14 | 0.82 | 0.19 |
| IgG d 21 | 1.70 | 0.62 |
| IgG d 28 | 2.24 | 0.73 |
| Viral load | 68.86 | 12.35 |
*measured as number of PCV2 genome copy number/ml of serum (log10).
Figure 2Variation across time points in ADG (kg) following experimental challenge with PCV2b.
Figure 3Variation across time points in PCV2b viremia * following experimental challenge with PCV2b. *measured as number of PCV2 genome copy number/ml of serum (log10).
Figure 4Variation across time points in antibody response IgM and IgG following experimental challenge with PCV2b.
Figure 5Individual profiles for PCV2b viremia * following experimental challenge with PCV2b. Individual profiles across time points demonstrate variation in magnitude and time of viral surge. *measured as number of PCV2 genome copy number/ml of serum (log10).
Figure 6Individual profiles for PCV2b-specific IgM antibody following experimental challenge with PCV2b. Individual profiles across time points demonstrate variation in magnitude and time of immune response.
Figure 7A moderate negative correlation was detected between PCV2b viral load – X and overall ADG - Y (r = − 0.35, < 0.0001) here represented as Z scores. Each dot represents an individual pig. Upper left group included pigs that maintained low PCV2b viral load and fast growth and compared to the bottom right group which included pigs that expressed high viral load and slow growth during 28 d PCV2b challenge.
Figure 8Viral load influenced the decline in ADG following PCV2b infection. The pigs with the lowest 10% level of viral load maintained a steady increased in weekly ADG (P < 0.0001) compared to the pigs that had the 10% largest viral load (P < 0.55). We predict that the growth of highly viremic pigs will be compromised even after the virus will be cleared.