Literature DB >> 25472583

Promoter polymorphism of FASL confers protection against female-specific cancers and those of FAS impact the cancers divergently.

Sateesh Reddy Nallapalle1, Sarika Daripally, V T S Vidudala Prasad.   

Abstract

We investigated risk association of FAS (-1377 G>A and -670 A>G) and FASL (-844 T>C) promoter polymorphisms with breast, ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancers and report that the FASL -844 CC genotype was protective against breast, ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancers (P ≤ 0.01). On the other hand, FAS -1377 GA and AA variants increased risk of breast cancer. However, the GA variant of FAS -1377 was also found to be a risk factor for cervical cancer. In contrast, FAS -670 AG variant significantly lowered risk of breast cancer. Further, we also observed that risk association of co-occurrence of FAS and/or FASL variants with the cancers varied as compared to the presence of individual polymorphisms. Although risk and protective haplotypes of FAS SNPs were observed across the cancer phenotypes, the association of the haplotypes was significant for breast cancer alone with a 3-fold enhanced risk. The protective effect of the FASL CC genotype seen in this study suggests that similar biomolecular mechanisms involving FASL might play a role in female-specific cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25472583     DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-2896-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumour Biol        ISSN: 1010-4283


  88 in total

1.  Unbalanced estrogen metabolism in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Muhammad Zahid; Cheryl L Beseler; James B Hall; Tricia LeVan; Ercole L Cavalieri; Eleanor G Rogan
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Anti-Fas on nonhematopoietic tumors: levels of Fas/APO-1 and bcl-2 are not predictive of biological responsiveness.

Authors:  L B Owen-Schaub; R Radinsky; E Kruzel; K Berry; S Yonehara
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Cervical cancer cells induce apoptosis of cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

Authors:  D N Contreras; P H Krammer; R K Potkul; P Bu; J L Rossi; A M Kaufmann; L Gissmann; L Qiao
Journal:  J Immunother       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.456

4.  Fas signaling in thyroid carcinomas is diverted from apoptosis to proliferation.

Authors:  Constantine S Mitsiades; Vassiliki Poulaki; Galinos Fanourakis; Elias Sozopoulos; Douglas McMillin; Zhaoqin Wen; Gerassimos Voutsinas; Sophia Tseleni-Balafouta; Nicholas Mitsiades
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Fas and Fas-ligand expression in human pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  M Kornmann; T Ishiwata; J Kleeff; H G Beger; M Korc
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Estrogens and epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Séverine Cunat; Pascale Hoffmann; Pascal Pujol
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Risk of second primary cancer among women with breast cancer: a population-based study in Granada (Spain).

Authors:  Esther Molina-Montes; Marina Pollán; Tilman Payer; Elena Molina; Cristina Dávila-Arias; María-José Sánchez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-05-04       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Quantitative assessment of the association between three polymorphisms in FAS and FASL gene and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Zexing Wang; Jun Gu; Weiwei Nie; Jing Xu; Guichun Huang; Xiaoxiang Guan
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-11-19

9.  Functional FAS promoter polymorphisms are associated with increased risk of acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Kathryn Sibley; Sara Rollinson; James M Allan; Alexandra G Smith; Graham R Law; Philippa L Roddam; Christine F Skibola; Martyn T Smith; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Quantitation of Fas and Fas ligand gene expression in human ovarian, cervical and endometrial carcinomas using real-time quantitative RT-PCR.

Authors:  H Das; T Koizumi; T Sugimoto; S Chakraborty; T Ichimura; K Hasegawa; R Nishimura
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  Susceptibility to oral cancers with CD95 and CD95L promoter SNPs may vary with the site and gender.

Authors:  Sarika Daripally; Sateesh Reddy Nallapalle; Saritha Katta; Vidudala V T S Prasad
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-05-06

2.  A Targeted Proteomics Approach for Screening Serum Biomarkers Observed in the Early Stage of Type I Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Blendi Ura; Valeria Capaci; Michelangelo Aloisio; Giovanni Di Lorenzo; Federico Romano; Giuseppe Ricci; Lorenzo Monasta
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-08-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.