| Literature DB >> 25472528 |
J Salvador Meza, Marc F Schetelig, C Silvia Zepeda-Cisneros, Alfred M Handler.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reliable marking systems are critical to the prospective field release of transgenic insect strains. This is to unambiguously distinguish released insects from wild insects in the field that are collected in field traps, and tissue-specific markers, such as those that are sperm-specific, have particular uses such as identifying wild females that have mated with released males. For tephritid fruit flies such as the Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens, polyubiquitin-regulated fluorescent protein body markers allow transgenic fly identification, and fluorescent protein genes regulated by the spermatocyte-specific β2-tubulin promoter effectively mark sperm. For sterile male release programs, both marking systems can be made male-specific by linkage to the Y chromosome.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25472528 PMCID: PMC4255795 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-15-S2-S4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
Figure 1Y-linked and autosomal fluorescent marker expression in . The brightfield (BF; A, D, G) and epifluorescent EGFP (GFP2; B, E, H), and DsRed (TXR; C, F, I) phenotypes of: a YEGFP male (left) and female (right) shown in panels A, B, and C; an autosomal insertion (unmapped) strain male (left) and female (right) shown in panels D, E, and F; and testes from a YEGFP and autosomal insertion strain male shown in panels G, H, and I. See Methods for details on epifluorescent microscopy and filter sets.
F2 progeny of Ytranslocation males
| Lines | Pupae | F2 adults* | adult eclosion | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| male | female | male | female | ||
| T(YEGFP/ | 57 | 46 | 51 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 88.35 |
| T(YEGFP/ | 34 | 30 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 62.50 |
| T(YEGFP/ | 66 | 51 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 91.45 |
| T(YEGFP/ | 73 | 57 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 44.62 |
| T(YEGFP/ | 39 | 25 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 75.00 |
* adults emerging from indicated pupal phenotypes
Figure 2Phenotypes of T(Y. A. ludens T(YEGFP/bp) male bpbrown pupa (A) and male adult (B) under epifluorescent GFP optics, and a female bp- black pupa (C) and female adult (D) under brightfield optics. All T(YEGFP/bp) males express the wild type brown pupal and EGFP phenotype, while all females express the mutant black pupal phenotype and lack EGFP fluorescence (not shown).
Fitness of translocation and reference lines.
| Line | egg hatch | egg to larvae survival | larvae to pupae survival | pupae to adult survival | males | egg to adult survival |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild type | 93.00 ± 0.69 a | 81.00 ± 2.32 a | 95.99 ± 2.03 ab | 98.28 ± 0.63 a | 0.45 ± 0.01 b | 76.60 ± 3.25 a |
| T(YEGFP/bp+)-1 | 42.80 ± 4.74 d | 19.60 ± 1.60 e | 99.23 ± 1.95 a | 90.89 ± 2.56 a | 0.61 ± 0.03 a | 17.60 ± 1.44 d |
| T(YEGFP/bp+)-2 | 58.90 ± 4.96 bc | 27.10 ± 3.44 de | 98.80 ± 0.51 a | 90.39 ± 1.71 a | 0.54 ± 0.03 ab | 24.10 ± 3.12 cd |
| T(YEGFP/bp+)-3 | 56.20 ± 2.38 c | 35.60 ± 1.71 cd | 97.65 ± 0.79 ab | 95.95 ± 1.67 a | 0.55 ± 0.02 ab | 33.40 ± 1.84 bc |
| T(YEGFP/bp+)-4 | 94.90 ± 0.65 a | 62.60 ± 1.78 b | 94.24 ± 1.13 ab | 61.84 ± 2.49 b | 0.62 ± 0.02 a | 36.40 ± 1.66 bc |
| T(YEGFP/bp+)-5 | 66.90 ± 1.30 bc | 36.70 ± 1.95 cd | 89.95 ± 3.56 b | 61.27 ± 12.72 b | 0.52 ± 0.02 ab | 29.80 ± 1.91 bc |
| T(Y/bp+)-7 | 71.80 ± 3.18 b | 43.80 ± 2.59 c | 89.95 ± 3.56 ab | 89.86 ± 1.57 a | 0.50 ± 0.02 ab | 38.10 ± 2.07 b |
: Egg hatch (F6,63 = 39.32, P < 0.0001); egg to larvae (F6,63 = 87, P < 0.0001); larvae to pupae (F6,63 = 104.21, P = 0.0135); pupae to adult (F6,63 = 9.39, P < 0.0001); male proportion (F6,63 = 4.61, P = 0.0006); egg to adult (F6,63 = 69.38, P < 0.0001)