Literature DB >> 25471988

Mind the gap: non-biological processes contributing to soil CO2 efflux.

Ana Rey1.   

Abstract

Widespread recognition of the importance of soil CO2 efflux as a major source of CO2 to the atmosphere has led to active research. A large soil respiration database and recent reviews have compiled data, methods, and current challenges. This study highlights some deficiencies for a proper understanding of soil CO2 efflux focusing on processes of soil CO2 production and transport that have not received enough attention in the current soil respiration literature. It has mostly been assumed that soil CO2 efflux is the result of biological processes (i.e. soil respiration), but recent studies demonstrate that pedochemical and geological processes, such as geothermal and volcanic CO2 degassing, are potentially important in some areas. Besides the microbial decomposition of litter, solar radiation is responsible for photodegradation or photochemical degradation of litter. Diffusion is considered to be the main mechanism of CO2 transport in the soil, but changes in atmospheric pressure and thermal convection may also be important mechanisms driving soil CO2 efflux greater than diffusion under certain conditions. Lateral fluxes of carbon as dissolved organic and inorganic carbon occur and may cause an underestimation of soil CO2 efflux. Traditionally soil CO2 efflux has been measured with accumulation chambers assuming that the main transport mechanism is diffusion. New techniques are available such as improved automated chambers, CO2 concentration profiles and isotopic techniques that may help to elucidate the sources of carbon from soils. We need to develop specific and standardized methods for different CO2 sources to quantify this flux on a global scale. Biogeochemical models should include biological and non-biological CO2 production processes before we can predict the response of soil CO2 efflux to climate change. Improving our understanding of the processes involved in soil CO2 efflux should be a research priority given the importance of this flux in the global carbon budget.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atmospheric pumping; carbonates; dissolved inorganic carbon; dissolved organic carbon; geological CO2; photodegradation; soil erosion; thermal convection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25471988     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  5 in total

1.  Environmental effects of ozone depletion and its interactions with climate change: Progress report, 2016.

Authors: 
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Dry habitats sustain high CO2 emissions from temporary ponds across seasons.

Authors:  Biel Obrador; Daniel von Schiller; Rafael Marcé; Lluís Gómez-Gener; Matthias Koschorreck; Carles Borrego; Núria Catalán
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Flow of CO2 from soil may not correspond with CO2 concentration in soil.

Authors:  Jan Frouz; Luděk Bujalský
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Abiotic carbonate dissolution traps carbon in a semiarid desert.

Authors:  Keyu Fa; Zhen Liu; Yuqing Zhang; Shugao Qin; Bin Wu; Jiabin Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Geological CO2 quantified by high-temporal resolution stable isotope monitoring in a salt mine.

Authors:  Alexander H Frank; Robert van Geldern; Anssi Myrttinen; Martin Zimmer; Johannes A C Barth; Bettina Strauch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.