Literature DB >> 2547182

Anterior cervical discectomy with hydroxylapatite fusion.

H J Senter1, R Kortyna, W R Kemp.   

Abstract

The outcome of microscopic anterior cervical discectomy with iliac crest interbody fusion in a group of 75 patients was compared with that of microscopic anterior cervical discectomy with synthetic hydroxylapatite fusion in a group of 84 patients. The rate of relief of myelopathy (70%) was similar in both groups, but those who underwent synthetic fusion had better long-term relief of radiculopathy, less need for a second operation at the same or an adjacent level, no resorption of the bone plug, comparable spinal alignment and stability, and the elimination of complications at the iliac crest donor site. The data suggest that hydroxylapatite fusion may be equal or superior to autologous iliac crest interbody fusion for anterior cervical disc surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2547182     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-198907000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  12 in total

1.  Biphasic synthetic bone substitute use in orthopaedic and trauma surgery: clinical, radiological and histological results.

Authors:  C Schwartz; P Liss; B Jacquemaire; P Lecestre; P Frayssinet
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Coralline hydroxyapatite reinforced with polylactide fibres in lumbar interbody implantation.

Authors:  P Ylinen; M Raekallio; R Taurio; K Vihtonen; S Vainionpää; E K Partio; P Törmälä; P Rokkanen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Primary stability of anterior lumbar stabilization: interdependence of implant type and endplate retention or removal.

Authors:  Christian H Flamme; Nadine von der Heide; Caroline Heymann; Christof Hurschler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Lumbar spine interbody fusion with reinforced hydroxyapatite implants.

Authors:  P Ylinen; J Kinnunen; E M Laasonen; A Lamminen; S Vainionpää; M Raekallio; P Rokkanen; P Törmälä
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 5.  Management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy.

Authors:  R Braakman
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Clinical, radiological and histological study of the failure of cervical interbody fusions with bone substitutes.

Authors:  Youzhuan Xie; Daniel Chopin; Pierre Hardouin; Jianxi Lu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Iliac crest versus artificial bone grafts in 250 cervical fusions.

Authors:  S Savolainen; J P Usenius; J Hernesniemi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of anterior cervical interbody fusion using hydroxyapatite spacer.

Authors:  Sung Chul Kim; Sung Won Kang; Se Hyuk Kim; Ki Hong Cho; Sang Hyun Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-10-31

Review 9.  Bone graft substitutes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Anthony M T Chau; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Posterior cervical foraminotomy for cervical radiculopathy: should cervical alignment be considered?

Authors:  Seok Won Chung; Hyun Jun Kim; Sang Ho Lee; Shin Young Lee; Min Soo Kang; Yong Hwan Shin; Chan Hong Park
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.