Literature DB >> 25471639

Flow cytometric DNA hypertetraploidy tends to be more frequent in male than in female breast cancers.

Joško Bezić1, Ivana Šamija Projić, Petar Projić, Jelena Ljubković, Sandra Zekić Tomaš, Kristina Meljanac Salopek, Marina Piljić Burazer, Snježana Tomić.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to explore possible differences in DNA flow cytometric characteristics, particularly differences in distribution of DNA indices of aneuploid clones, between male and female breast cancers. We retrospectively analyzed 31 male breast cancers. Clinicopathological and DNA flow cytometric characteristics of male breast cancers (patient age, tumor size, histological type, histological grade, axillary lymph node status, hormone receptor expression, ploidy, and S-phase fraction) were compared with that of the control group of matched female breast cancers. Hormone receptors and HER-2/neu were investigated immunohistochemically with additional chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) analysis of HER-2/neu 2+ cases. Ploidy and S-phase fraction were determined by DNA flow cytometry. Comparison with clinicopathological features was made using χ (2) and t test. Aneuploidy was found in 78% of the cases, with the predomination of hypotetraploid clones (39%), followed by tetraploid (23%) and hypertetraploid clones (16%). We found higher frequency of hypertetraploidy in male breast cancers (16 and 6%, respectively) than in the control group of matched female breast cancers. Clinicopathological features of hypertetraploid male breast cancers did not differ from that of non-hypertetraploid cancers. Higher frequency of hypertetraploidy among male breast cancers might indicate different cytogenetical evolutionary pathway between male and female breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25471639     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-014-1694-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  25 in total

1.  DNA ploidy and p53 expression correlate with survival and cell proliferative activity in male breast carcinoma.

Authors:  A Pich; E Margaria; L Chiusa; R Ponti; M Geuna
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Breast cancer genetic evolution: I. Data from cytogenetics and DNA content.

Authors:  B Dutrillaux; M Gerbault-Seureau; Y Remvikos; B Zafrani; M Prieur
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  Ploidy analysis and S-phase fraction determination by flow cytometry of invasive adenocarcinomas of the breast.

Authors:  H F Frierson
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Method for analysis of cellular DNA content of paraffin-embedded pathological material using flow cytometry.

Authors:  D W Hedley; M L Friedlander; I W Taylor; C A Rugg; E A Musgrove
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.479

6.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  C W Elston; I O Ellis
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  DNA content and S-phase fraction in male breast carcinomas.

Authors:  T Hatschek; S Wingren; J Carstensen; R Hultborn
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.089

8.  Prognosis of breast cancer in males: an analysis of 170 cases.

Authors:  B Salvadori; R Saccozzi; A Manzari; S Andreola; R A Conti; F Cusumano; M Grassi
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Male breast carcinoma: an evaluation of prognostic factors contributing to a poorer outcome.

Authors:  M G Joshi; A K Lee; M Loda; M G Camus; C Pedersen; G J Heatley; K S Hughes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Invasive carcinomas of the male breast: a morphologic study of the distribution of histologic subtypes and metastatic patterns in 778 cases.

Authors:  Ana M Burga; Oluwole Fadare; Ruth A Lininger; Fattaneh A Tavassoli
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.