Juliette M Mott1,2,3,4, Kathleen M Grubbs3,5,6, Shubhada Sansgiry1,3,7, John C Fortney3,5,6, Jeffrey A Cully1,2,3. 1. VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas. 2. Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 3. VA South Central Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Houston, Texas, Little Rock, Arkansas. 4. National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, White River Junction, Vermont. 5. VA HSR&D Center for Mental Health Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, North Little Rock, Arkansas. 6. Department of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas. 7. Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study evaluated change in rural and urban veterans' psychotherapy use during a period of widespread effort within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) to engage rural veterans in mental health care. METHODS: National VHA administrative databases were queried for patients receiving a new diagnosis of depression, anxiety, or posttraumatic stress disorder in fiscal years (FY) 2007 and 2010. Using the US Department of Agriculture Rural-Urban Continuum Codes, we identified urban (FY 2007: n = 192,347; FY 2010: n = 231,471) and rural (FY 2007: n = 72,923; FY 2010: n = 81,905) veterans. Veterans' psychotherapy use during the 12 months following diagnosis was assessed. FINDINGS: From FY 2007 to 2010, the proportion of veterans receiving any psychotherapy increased from 17% to 22% for rural veterans and 24% to 28% for urban veterans. Rural veterans were less likely to receive psychotherapy across both fiscal years; however, the magnitude of this disparity decreased significantly from 2007 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.51) to 2010 (OR = 1.41). Similarly, although urban veterans received more psychotherapy sessions, urban-rural disparities in the receipt of 8 or more psychotherapy sessions decreased over the study period (2007: OR = 2.32; 2010: OR = 1.69). CONCLUSIONS: Rural and urban veterans are increasingly making use of psychotherapy, and rural-urban gaps in psychotherapy use are shrinking. These improvements suggest that recent VHA efforts to engage rural veterans in care have been successful at reducing differences between rural and urban veterans with respect to access and engagement in psychotherapy.
PURPOSE: This study evaluated change in rural and urban veterans' psychotherapy use during a period of widespread effort within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) to engage rural veterans in mental health care. METHODS: National VHA administrative databases were queried for patients receiving a new diagnosis of depression, anxiety, or posttraumatic stress disorder in fiscal years (FY) 2007 and 2010. Using the US Department of Agriculture Rural-Urban Continuum Codes, we identified urban (FY 2007: n = 192,347; FY 2010: n = 231,471) and rural (FY 2007: n = 72,923; FY 2010: n = 81,905) veterans. Veterans' psychotherapy use during the 12 months following diagnosis was assessed. FINDINGS: From FY 2007 to 2010, the proportion of veterans receiving any psychotherapy increased from 17% to 22% for rural veterans and 24% to 28% for urban veterans. Rural veterans were less likely to receive psychotherapy across both fiscal years; however, the magnitude of this disparity decreased significantly from 2007 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.51) to 2010 (OR = 1.41). Similarly, although urban veterans received more psychotherapy sessions, urban-rural disparities in the receipt of 8 or more psychotherapy sessions decreased over the study period (2007: OR = 2.32; 2010: OR = 1.69). CONCLUSIONS: Rural and urban veterans are increasingly making use of psychotherapy, and rural-urban gaps in psychotherapy use are shrinking. These improvements suggest that recent VHA efforts to engage rural veterans in care have been successful at reducing differences between rural and urban veterans with respect to access and engagement in psychotherapy.
Authors: Charles N Bernstein; Carol A Hitchon; Randy Walld; James M Bolton; Jitender Sareen; John R Walker; Lesley A Graff; Scott B Patten; Alexander Singer; Lisa M Lix; Renée El-Gabalawy; Alan Katz; John D Fisk; Ruth Ann Marrie Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2019-01-10 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Richard E Adams; Thomas G Urosevich; Stuart N Hoffman; H Lester Kirchner; Johanna C Hyacinthe; Charles R Figley; Joseph J Boscarino; Joseph A Boscarino Journal: Mil Behav Health Date: 2017-05-19
Authors: Michael J Ward; John L Shuster; Nicholas M Mohr; Peter J Kaboli; Amanda S Mixon; Jennifer Kemmer; Corey Campbell; Candace D McNaughton Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2021-11-16 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: Andrea K Finlay; Alex H S Harris; Joel Rosenthal; Jessica Blue-Howells; Sean Clark; Bessie Flatley; Christine Timko Journal: Rural Ment Health Date: 2018-01
Authors: Kara M Bensley; John Fortney; Gary Chan; Julia C Dombrowski; India Ornelas; Anna D Rubinsky; Gwen T Lapham; Joseph E Glass; Emily C Williams Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Brenna N Renn; Patricia A Areán; Patrick J Raue; Eugene Aisenberg; Emily C Friedman; Zoran Popović Journal: Res Soc Work Pract Date: 2020-10-13