AnnaLynn M Williams1,2, Matthew Bonner3, Heather M Ochs-Balcom3, Helena Hwang4,5, Carl Morrison5, Susan E McCann6. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. Annalynn_williams@urmc.rochester.edu. 2. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA. Annalynn_williams@urmc.rochester.edu. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. 4. Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 5. Department of Pathology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA. 6. Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Lignans, a class of phytoestrogen commonly found in the Western diet, have been linked to decreased breast cancer risks in epidemiologic studies. Similar to estrogen receptors, the androgen receptor (AR), a prognostic factor in breast tumors, may be affected by lignans. However, few studies have investigated this link in the context of breast cancer etiology. We evaluated the relationship between dietary lignan intake and AR expression in incident breast tumors. METHODS: Tumor tissue, epidemiological, and clinical data were collected from 216 women with incident, primary, histologically confirmed breast cancer enrolled in the Roswell Park Cancer Institute (RPCI) Data Bank and BioRepository (DBBR). On average, three tumor cores from each participant were assembled into a tissue micro array. After immunohistochemical staining, a trained RPCI pathologist determined AR status of each core. Lignan intake was calculated from a food frequency questionnaire collected upon enrollment into the DBBR. RESULTS: We observed a weak positive association between dietary lignans and AR expression [β (SE) 27.6 (17.0), p 0.10], and there was no significant difference in lignan intake across categories of AR expression (p = 0.09, R (2) = 0.35). CONCLUSION: Our results do not support a clear relationship between dietary lignan intake and AR expression. This investigation is the first, to our knowledge, to examine dietary lignan intake and AR expression in breast tumors. Further research is needed within a larger, more representative sample to determine whether lignan intake is truly associated with AR expression.
PURPOSE:Lignans, a class of phytoestrogen commonly found in the Western diet, have been linked to decreased breast cancer risks in epidemiologic studies. Similar to estrogen receptors, the androgen receptor (AR), a prognostic factor in breast tumors, may be affected by lignans. However, few studies have investigated this link in the context of breast cancer etiology. We evaluated the relationship between dietary lignan intake and AR expression in incident breast tumors. METHODS:Tumor tissue, epidemiological, and clinical data were collected from 216 women with incident, primary, histologically confirmed breast cancer enrolled in the Roswell Park Cancer Institute (RPCI) Data Bank and BioRepository (DBBR). On average, three tumor cores from each participant were assembled into a tissue micro array. After immunohistochemical staining, a trained RPCI pathologist determined AR status of each core. Lignan intake was calculated from a food frequency questionnaire collected upon enrollment into the DBBR. RESULTS: We observed a weak positive association between dietary lignans and AR expression [β (SE) 27.6 (17.0), p 0.10], and there was no significant difference in lignan intake across categories of AR expression (p = 0.09, R (2) = 0.35). CONCLUSION: Our results do not support a clear relationship between dietary lignan intake and AR expression. This investigation is the first, to our knowledge, to examine dietary lignan intake and AR expression in breast tumors. Further research is needed within a larger, more representative sample to determine whether lignan intake is truly associated with AR expression.
Authors: Rong Hu; Shaheenah Dawood; Michelle D Holmes; Laura C Collins; Stuart J Schnitt; Kimberley Cole; Jonathan D Marotti; Susan E Hankinson; Graham A Colditz; Rulla M Tamimi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-02-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Michelle Cotterchio; Beatrice A Boucher; Nancy Kreiger; Catherine A Mills; Lilian U Thompson Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2007-11-09 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Amelia A Peters; Grant Buchanan; Carmela Ricciardelli; Tina Bianco-Miotto; Margaret M Centenera; Jonathan M Harris; Shalini Jindal; Davendra Segara; Li Jia; Nicole L Moore; Susan M Henshall; Stephen N Birrell; Gerhard A Coetzee; Robert L Sutherland; Lisa M Butler; Wayne D Tilley Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Camilla Taxvig; Anders Elleby; Katrine Sonne-Hansen; Eva C Bonefeld-Jørgensen; Anne Marie Vinggaard; Anne E Lykkesfeldt; Christine Nellemann Journal: Nutr Cancer Date: 2010 Impact factor: 2.900
Authors: Luis O Gonzalez; Maria D Corte; Julio Vazquez; Sara Junquera; Rosario Sanchez; Ana C Alvarez; Juan C Rodriguez; Maria L Lamelas; Francisco J Vizoso Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2008-05-28 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Gunter G C Kuhnle; Caterina Dell'Aquila; Sue M Aspinall; Shirley A Runswick; Angela A Mulligan; Sheila A Bingham Journal: J Agric Food Chem Date: 2008-10-16 Impact factor: 5.279