| Literature DB >> 25471044 |
Jian Xu, Xiang Geng, Hassan Muhammad, Xin Ma1, Xu Wang, Jiazhang Huang, Chao Zhang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies have yet to determine the optimal height at which the posterior tibial tendon (PTT) can be re-routed and the tendon length discrepancy at different height levels in terms of PTT transfer via the circumtibial route. This cadaveric study was conducted to determine the optimal height of PTT subcutaneous transfer and to compare tendon length discrepancies at different heights.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25471044 PMCID: PMC4255935 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-014-0121-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Figure 1Procedures used to expose and isolate the PTT. (A) With a 2-cm medial incision, the tendon was divided at its insertion to the navicular region, preserving as much length as possible. (B) The distal tip of the medial malleolus was confirmed with a small screw as a marker. (C) A second 2-cm long incision posterior to the medial region of the tibial crest was made along the fascia of the calf, where the upper edge was 3 cm proximal to the distal tip of the medial malleolus. (D) PTT was isolated and then re-routed.
Figure 2An X-ray machine was used to determine the midpoints of the (A) intermediate cuneiform, (B) lateral cuneiform, and (C) cuboid.
Figure 3Procedures used for measurement. (A) We classified the point of the upper edge of the second incision as point “a,” which can be changed according to different height levels for transfer. The distal tip of the tendon was classified as point “b.” The midpoints of the intermediate cuneiform, the lateral cuneiform, and the cuboid were defined as points “c,” “d,” and “e,” respectively. PTT was re-routed to reach the midpoints of the (A) intermediate cuneiform, (B) the lateral cuneiform, and (C) the cuboid by applying tension to some extent. During this procedure, the limb was kept in a neutral position.
Comparison of the length of PTT tendon and the length needed for transfer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| 3 | 9.2 ± 2.1 | 9.8 ± 1.7 | 10.1 ± 2.3 | 10.8 ± 1.4 | 0.6 ± 2.4 | 0.022* | 0.9 ± 2.1 | 0.013* | 1.6 ± 1.7 | 0.005* |
| 4 | 10.2 ± 2.1 | 10.3 ± 2.0 | 10.5 ± 1.9 | 11.4 ± 2.2 | 0.1 ± 0.2 | 0.13 | 0.3 ± 1.1 | 0.021* | 1.2 ± 1.8 | 0.0089* |
| 5 | 11.2 ± 2.1 | 10.1 ± 2.3 | 10.7 ± 2.5 | 11.1 ± 1.7 | −1.1 ± 1.0 | 0.017* | −0.5 ± 1.7 | 0.020* | −0.1 ± 0.8 | 0.026* |
| 6 | 12.2 ± 2.1 | 10.4 ± 2.8 | 11.5 ± 1.6 | 11.9 ± 2.0 | −1.8 ± 1.4 | 0.009* | −0.7 ± 2.4 | 0.015* | −0.3 ± 1.3 | 0.010* |
| 7 | 13.2 ± 2.1 | 10.9 ± 1.9 | 12.1 ± 1.4 | 12.8 ± 2.3 | −2.3 ± 1.8 | 0.007* | −1.1 ± 1.3 | 0.023* | −0.4 ± 1.7 | 0.019* |
| 8 | 14.2 ± 2.1 | 12.8 ± 1.3 | 13.1 ± 1.9 | 13.5 ± 2.1 | −1.4 ± 2.2 | 0.019* | −1.1 ± 1.9 | 0.009* | −0.7 ± 0.6 | 0.031* |
| 9 | 15.2 ± 2.1 | 13.1 ± 2.0 | 13.5 ± 1.6 | 14.0 ± 2.5 | −2.1 ± 1.7 | 0.012* | −1.7 ± 2.1 | 0.014* | −1.2 ± 2.0 | 0.024* |
| 10 | 16.2 ± 2.1 | 13.5 ± 2.1 | 14.3 ± 2.6 | 14.7 ± 1.1 | −2.7 ± 1.9 | 0.016* | −1.9 ± 2.3 | 0.012* | −1.5 ± 1.8 | 0.019* |
| 11 | 17.2 ± 2.1 | 14.1 ± 2.3 | 14.9 ± 1.8 | 15.2 ± 1.3 | −3.1 ± 1.4 | 0.005* | −2.3 ± 2.6 | 0.006* | −2.0 ± 2.3 | 0.008* |
*Significance (p < 0.05), ab compared with ac, ad, and ae. D ab-ac, D ab-ad, and D ab-ae stand for the length of ab minus ac, ad, and ae, respectively.
Angles between the tendon outside the fascia to different bones and inside the fascia to different bones at different heights while transferring
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| 3 | - | - | - |
| 4 | - | - | - |
| 5 | 130 ± 5.6 | 125 ± 7.1 | 120 ± 4.8 |
| 6 | 145 ± 6.1 | 137 ± 8.3 | 133 ± 7.1 |
| 7 | 152 ± 4.5 | 145 ± 4.8 | 140 ± 3.9 |
| 8 | 161 ± 6.8 | 155 ± 7.6 | 145 ± 5.7 |
| 9 | 168 ± 4.2 | 160 ± 5.1 | 154 ± 4.9 |
| 10 | 177 ± 2.1 | 170 ± 3.1 | 164 ± 3.7 |
| 11 | 178 ± 1.8* | 171 ± 2.4* | 165 ± 3.3* |
*Significance (p > 0.05), “α,” “β,” and “γ” at a height of 11 cm compared with “α,” “β,” and “γ” at a height of 10 cm.