| Literature DB >> 25471043 |
Raymond Wong, Claire L Gibson1, David A Kendall, Philip M W Bath.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Progesterone is neuroprotective in numerous preclinical CNS injury models including cerebral ischaemia. The aim of this study was two-fold; firstly, we aimed to determine whether progesterone delivery via osmotic mini-pump would confer neuroprotective effects and whether such neuroprotection could be produced in co-morbid animals.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25471043 PMCID: PMC4255926 DOI: 10.1186/s12868-014-0131-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurosci ISSN: 1471-2202 Impact factor: 3.288
Figure 1The effect of progesterone treatment in young adult males. Comparison of post-surgery survival according to treatment/surgery (A). Mortality data expressed using the Kaplan-Meier curve and analysis using the Mantel-Haenszel log-rank test revealed no significant difference in survival between groups (P = 0.3286). In terms of body mass gain following surgery (B), both progesterone and vehicle treated groups gained body mass at significantly slower rate compared to shams (P = 0.0004). Neurological deficit scoring (C) revealed that MCAO resulted in a significant neurological deficit regardless of whether mice had received progesterone (P = 0.0049) or vehicle (P = 0.0002) treatment compared to shams. Progesterone treatment reduced neurological deficit compared to vehicle treatment (P = 0.0271). Assessment of motor performance, using the foot-fault test (D) revealed that progesterone treatment resulted in significantly fewer contralateral foot-faults compared to vehicle treated animals (P = 0.0108). Number of animals per group is shown in parentheses, all data (B-D) are expressed as mean ± SEM, and * = P < 0.05.
Number of mice in each experimental group at each time point
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 4 |
|
| 5 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 4 | ||
|
| 5 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 3 | ||
|
| 5 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 3 | ||
|
| 4 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | ||
|
| 4 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 3 | ||
|
| 4 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 3 | ||
Body mass for each animal were collected prior to assessing functional outcome or being killed for welfare reasons. Aged mice were not assessed following day 1 as they were excluded for welfare reasons.
T-maze data for animals following MCAO
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16.67 ± 7.45 | 33.33 ± 16.67 | |||
|
| 34.29 ± 12.45 | 61.90 ± 20.76 | ||||
|
| 3.31 ± 0.27 | 3.81 ± 0.27 | ||||
|
|
| 16.67 ± 10.54 | 11.11 ± 11.11 | |||
|
| 25.71 ± 17.14* | 95.24 ± 4.76 | ||||
|
| 3.51 ± 0.27* | 5.52 ± 0.80 | ||||
|
|
| 58.34 ± 4.81 | 38.89 ± 12.67 | 26.67 ± 16.33 | 50.00 ± 9.62 | 33.33 ± 19.25 |
|
| 57.14 ± 5.83 | 54.62 ± 14.03 | 17.14 ± 10.50 | 57.14 ± 14.29 | 71.43 ± 14.29 | |
|
| 7.78 ± 0.94 | 6.27 ± 0.91 | 3.84 ± 0.35* | 5.59 ± 0.21 | 5.59 ± 0.76 | |
There was no significant difference between groups in terms of % alternation rate, contralateral/ipsilateral alternation ratio (%), or time taken to complete trials in adult mice (progesterone n = 6, vehicle n = 3, sham n = 4). In hypertensive BPH/2 mice, there was no difference found between progesterone and non-treated groups in t-maze alternation %, but progesterone treated animals had a significantly greater contralateral goal arm preference than non-treated groups (P = 0.0006). Data expressed as mean ± SEM (progesterone n = 5, vehicle n = 4).
Figure 2The effect of progesterone treatment in aged animals. Comparison of post-surgery survival according to treatment/surgery in aged C57 Bl/6 mice (A). Mortality data expressed using the Kaplan-Meier curve and analysed using the Mantel-Haenszel log-rank test revealed no significant difference between groups in % of surviving animals (P = 0.5266). Body mass gain following surgery in aged C57 Bl/6 mice (B) at 24 h post-MCAO found no difference in body mass gain between progesterone and vehicle treated animals groups (P = 0.8903). Neurological score was assessed in aged C57/Bl6 at 24 h post-MCAO (C) no difference was found between treatment groups. Individual data points are shown for body mass and neurological score.
Figure 3The effect of hypertension on outcome following MCAO and progesterone treatment. The percentage of animals survived post-surgery over time (A). Mortality data expressed using the Kaplan-Meier curve and analysed using the Mantel-Haenszel log-rank test showed no significant difference between groups in % of surviving animals. All BPH/2 mice significantly lost body mass after surgery (P = 0.0001) but progesterone treatment did not affect the amount of body mass loss (B). Progesterone treatment reduced neurological deficit (C) compared to controls (***P = 0.0001). Contralateral foot-faults (%) were assessed in BPH/2 mice on the day following surgery (D) and there was no difference found between progesterone and non-treated mice (P = 0.0679). Number of animals per group are shown in parentheses and all data (B-D) are expressed as mean ± SEM.