| Literature DB >> 25470375 |
Jérôme Salles1, Nicolas Cardinault2, Véronique Patrac3, Alexandre Berry4, Christophe Giraudet5, Marie-Laure Collin6, Audrey Chanet7, Camille Tagliaferri8, Philippe Denis9, Corinne Pouyet10, Yves Boirie11, Stéphane Walrand12.
Abstract
Although the management of malnutrition is a priority in older people, this population shows a resistance to refeeding. Fresh bee pollen contains nutritional substances of interest for malnourished people. The aim was to evaluate the effect of fresh bee pollen supplementation on refeeding efficiency in old malnourished rats. Male 22-month-old Wistar rats were undernourished by reducing food intake for 12 weeks. The animals were then renourished for three weeks with the same diet supplemented with 0%, 5% or 10% of fresh monofloral bee pollen. Due to changes in both lean mass and fat mass, body weight decreased during malnutrition and increased after refeeding with no between-group differences (p < 0.0001). Rats refed with the fresh bee pollen-enriched diets showed a significant increase in muscle mass compared to restricted rats (p < 0.05). The malnutrition period reduced the muscle protein synthesis rate and mTOR/p70S6kinase/4eBP1 activation, and only the 10%-pollen diet was able to restore these parameters. Mitochondrial activity was depressed with food restriction and was only improved by refeeding with the fresh bee pollen-containing diets. In conclusion, refeeding diets that contain fresh monofloral bee pollen improve muscle mass and metabolism in old, undernourished rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25470375 PMCID: PMC4276980 DOI: 10.3390/nu6125500
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Composition of the diets.
| g/100 g | Standard Diet | 5% Pollen Diet | 10% Pollen Diet |
|---|---|---|---|
| Casein | 14 | 14 | 14 |
| Cornstarch | 46 | 41 | 36 |
| Sucrose | 28 | 28 | 28 |
| Soybean oil | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Cellulose | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Vitamins and minerals mix | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Bee pollen | 0 | 5 | 10 |
Composition and antioxidant value of fresh bee pollen formula.
| Fresh Bee Pollen Formula | |
|---|---|
|
| 16.2 |
| EAA (g/100 g) | 4.8 |
| BCAA (g/100 g) | 2.3 |
| SAA (g/100 g) | 0.6 |
|
| 57.7 |
| Lipids (g/100 g) | 7.3 |
| Saturated FA (% of total FA) | 43.1 |
| Monounsaturated FA (% of total FA) | 16.1 |
| Polyunsaturated FA (% of total FA) | 40.8 |
| Fiber (g/100 g) | 11.4 |
| Vitamin B1 (mg/100 g) | 0.65 |
| Vitamin B2 (mg/100 g) | 0.76 |
| Vitamin PP(mg/100 g) | 7.05 |
| Vitamin B5 (mg/100 g) | 0.77 |
| Vitamin B6 (mg/100 g) | 2.38 |
| Vitamin B9 (mg/100 g) | 0.81 |
| Vitamin C (mg/100 g) | 42.7 |
| Vitamin E (mg/10 0g) | 12.9 |
| Calories (kcal/100 g) | 315.8 |
|
| |
| FRAP (mmol/kg eq ascorbic acid) | 25.8 |
| ORAC (mmol/100 g eq trolox) | 5.6 |
EAA: essential amino acids; BCAA: branched chain amino acids; SAA: sulfur amino acids; FA: fatty acids; FRAP: ferric reducing ability of plasma; ORAC: oxygen radical absorbance capacity value.
Body weight, body composition and tissue weight after dietary restriction and refeeding with fresh bee pollen-containing diets in old rats.
| Controls | Restricted | Refed Standard | Refed 5% Pollen | Refed 10% Pollen | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 629 ± 5 a | 418 ± 13 b | 570 ± 19 a | 556 ± 20 a | 560 ± 13 a |
| Fat mass (g) | 151 ± 16 a | 13 ± 3 b | 84 ± 11 c | 78 ± 9 c | 87 ± 5 c |
| Fat-free mass (g) | 491 ± 16 a | 385 ± 4 b | 493 ± 11 a | 487 ± 14 a | 482 ± 12 a |
| Hindlimb muscle mass (g) | 11.5 ± 0.7 | 10.8 ± 0.7 | 11.8 ± 1.1 | 12.2 ± 0.4 | 12.7 ± 0.6 |
| Plantaris (mg) | 335 ± 36 a | 317 ± 22 a | 349 ± 27 a,b | 380 ± 14 b | 389 ± 28 b |
| Soleus (mg) | 204 ± 13 | 199 ± 15 | 198 ± 18 | 203 ± 10 | 213 ± 9 |
| Gastrocnemius (g) | 1.71 ± 0.16 a | 1.47 ± 0.10 b | 1.67 ± 0.18 a,b | 1.80 ± 0.07 a | 1.79 ± 0.11 a |
| Visceral adipose tissue (g) | 15.7 ± 3.3 a | 1.8 ± 0.5 b | 11.1 ± 1.4 a | 10.0 ± 4.4 a | 11.3 ± 0.9 a |
| Subcutaneous adipose tissue (g) | 18.8 ± 7.7 a | 3.1 ± 0.8 b | 7.6 ± 1.2 b,c | 7.3 ± 1.2 b,c | 8.3 ± 0.9 c |
| Liver (g) | 14.4 ± 1.4 a | 8.9 ± 0.4 b | 14.0 ± 0.6 a | 12.6 ± 0.5 a | 12.8 ± 0.4 a |
| Heart (g) | 1.77 ± 0.9 a | 1.51 ± 0.05 b | 1.88 ± 0.04 a | 1.82 ± 0.07 a | 1.86 ± 0.06 a |
| Kidney (g) | 1.70 ± 0.15 a | 1.42 ± 0.05 b | 1.79 ± 0.08 a | 1.69 ± 0.09 a | 1.76 ± 0.08 a |
Values are the means ± SEM. a ≠ b ≠ c at p < 0.05. Control rats were fed the standard diet ad libitum throughout the experiment. Food-restricted rats were allowed to consume 50% (12 g/day) of their spontaneous intakes with a standard diet for 12 weeks. At the end of restriction, all of the animals were refed for three weeks with either the standard diet or a diet supplemented with 5 g/100 g (5%) or 10 g/100 g (10%) of fresh bee pollen.
Plasma biochemistry and inflammatory profile after dietary restriction and refeeding with fresh bee pollen-containing diets in old rats.
| Controls | Restricted | Refed Standard | Refed 5% Pollen | Refed 10% Pollen | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insulin (ng/mL) | 2.93 ± 1.22 | 1.36 ± 0.61 | 1.70 ± 0.41 | 1.66 ± 0.25 | 1.45 ± 0.13 |
| Leptin (pg/mL) | 2481 ± 555 a | 551 ± 89 b | 1061 ± 212 b | 1207 ± 201 b | 1087 ± 123 b |
| Adiponectin (µg/mL) | 12.9 ± 1.2 a | 23.0 ± 1.4 b | 15.0 ± 1.5 a | 14.3 ± 2.4 a | 15.7 ± 0.9 a |
| Resistin (ng/mL) | 23.6 ± 4.1 a | 36.7 ± 3.9 b | 27.2 ± 1.3 a | 24.4 ± 1.9 a | 22.0 ± 2.1 a |
| Alpha2-macroglobuline (µg/mL) | 14.0 ± 4.2 a | 10.1 ± 1.1 b | 11.8 ± 3.0 b | 11.2 ± 1.5 b | 14.8 ± 0.5 a |
| Orosomucoid (µg/mL) | 56 ± 7 a | 108 ± 14 b | 77 ± 8 a | 73 ± 6 a | 71 ± 9 a |
| TNFα (pg/mL) | 13.9 ± 0.5 | 12.9 ± 0.4 | 13.3 ± 0.3 | 12.9 ± 0.6 | 13.9 ± 0.4 |
| sTNF-R1 (pg/mL) | 128 ± 7 a | 94 ± 4 b | 122 ± 7 a | 129 ± 5 a | 130 ± 6 a |
| sTNF-R2 (pg/mL) | 1145 ± 75 a | 814 ± 30 b | 1212 ± 143 a | 1088 ± 51 a | 1105 ± 82 a |
| IL1β (pg/mL) | 38.4 ± 4.4 | 43.6 ± 13.1 | 37.1 ± 3.2 | 38.9 ± 13.8 | 31.4 ± 2.7 |
| IL6 (pg/mL) | 40.5 ± 7.7 | 32.6 ± 7.1 | 31.7 ± 3.2 | 44.6 ± 3.0 | 39.4 ± 6.3 |
Values are the means ± SEM. a ≠ b at p < 0.05. TNFα, tumor necrosis factor-α; sTNF-R1, soluble TNFα receptor 1; sTNF-R2, soluble TNFα receptor 2; IL1β, interleukin 1-β; IL6, interleukin 6. Control rats were fed the standard diet ad libitum throughout the experiment. Food-restricted rats were allowed to consume 50% (12 g/day) of their spontaneous intakes with a standard diet for 12 weeks. At the end of restriction, all of the animals were refed for three weeks with either the standard diet or a diet supplemented with 5 g/100 g (5%) or 10 g/100 g (10%) of fresh bee pollen.
Muscle mitochondrial activity after dietary restriction and refeeding with pollen-containing diets in old rats.
| Controls | Restricted | Refed Standard | Refed 5% Pollen | Refed 10% Pollen | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CS (µmol/min/mg proteins) | 0.346 ± 0.029 a | 0.243 ± 0.028 b | 0.228 ± 0.032 b | 0.294 ± 0.031 a,b | 0.256 ± 0.034 a,b |
| HAD (nmol/min/mg proteins) | 8.45 ± 0.56 | 7.67 ± 0.92 | 7.56 ± 0.91 | 8.32 ± 1.44 | 8.73 ± 0.95 |
| Complex II (nmol/min/mg proteins) | 21.0 ± 1.3 a | 17.5 ± 0.8 a,b | 17.1 ± 1.3 b | 17.7 ± 2.4 a,b | 18.6 ± 1.5 a,b |
| Complex III (nmol/min/mg proteins) | 2.99 ± 0.64 | 2.61 ± 0.63 | 2.52 ± 0.39 | 1.98 ± 0.59 | 2.02 ± 0.45 |
| Complex IV (nmol/min/mg proteins) | 16.8 ± 1.5 a | 12.7 ± 1.7 b | 12.9 ± 1.4 b | 12.8 ± 0.9 b | 16.0 ± 2.3 a |
Values are the means ± SEM. a ≠ b at p < 0.05. CS, citrate synthase; HAD, 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase. Control rats were fed the standard diet ad libitum throughout the experiment. Food-restricted rats were allowed to consume 50% (12 g/day) of their spontaneous intakes with a standard diet for 12 weeks. At the end of restriction, all of the animals were refed for three weeks with either the standard diet or a diet supplemented with 5 g/100 g (5%) or 10 g/100 g (10%) of fresh bee pollen.
Figure 1Muscle absolute synthesis rate after dietary restriction and refeeding with fresh pollen-containing diets in old rats.
Figure 2Regulation of the mTOR/p70S6k/4EBP1 signaling pathway after dietary restriction and refeeding with fresh pollen-containing diets in old rats.