Literature DB >> 25470326

Can consumer choice replace trust in the National Health Service in England? Towards developing an affective psychosocial conception of trust in health care.

Marianna Fotaki1.   

Abstract

Trust has long been regarded as a vitally important aspect of the relationship between health service providers and patients. Recently, consumer choice has been increasingly advocated as a means of improving the quality and effectiveness of health service provision. However, it is uncertain how the increase of information necessary to allow users of health services to exercise choice, and the simultaneous introduction of markets in public health systems, will affect various dimensions of trust, and how changing relations of trust will impact upon patients and services. This article employs a theory-driven approach to investigate conceptual and material links between choice, trust and markets in health care in the context of the National Health Service in England. It also examines the implications of patient choice on systemic, organisational and interpersonal trust. The article is divided into two parts. The first argues that the shift to marketisation in public health services might lead to an over-reliance on rational-calculative aspects of trust at the expense of embodied, relational and social attributes. The second develops an alternative psychosocial conception of trust: it focuses on the central role of affect and accounts for the material and symbolic links between choice, trust and markets in health care.
© 2014 The Author. Sociology of Health & Illness © 2014 Foundation for the Sociology of Health & Illness/John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  affect; choice; market; psychosocial; public health system; trust

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25470326     DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Health Illn        ISSN: 0141-9889


  6 in total

1.  Why and how is compassion necessary to provide good quality healthcare?

Authors:  Marianna Fotaki
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-03-16

2.  How Do Women View Risk-Based Mammography Screening? A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Xiaofei He; Karen E Schifferdecker; Elissa M Ozanne; Anna N A Tosteson; Steven Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  A structuration framework for bridging the macro-micro divide in health-care governance.

Authors:  Virginia Bodolica; Martin Spraggon; Gabriela Tofan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  "You get to know the people and whether they're talking sense or not": Negotiating trust on health-related forums.

Authors:  Ellen Brady; Julia Segar; Caroline Sanders
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Accessing support and empowerment online: The experiences of individuals with diabetes.

Authors:  Ellen Brady; Julia Segar; Caroline Sanders
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Why We Must Talk About Institutional Corruption to Understand Wrongdoing in the Health Sector Comment on "We Need to Talk About Corruption in Health Systems".

Authors:  Marianna Fotaki
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2020-05-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.