Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain tumor, with dismal survival outcomes. Recently, cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been demonstrated to play a role in therapeutic resistance and are considered to be the most likely cause of cancer relapse. The identification of CSCs is an important step toward finding new and effective ways to treat GBM. Tenascin-C (TNC) protein has been identified as a potential marker for CSCs in gliomas based on previous work. Here, we have investigated the expression of TNC in tissue microarrays including 17 GBMs, 18 WHO grade III astrocytomas, 15 WHO grade II astrocytomas, 4 WHO grade I astrocytomas, and 7 normal brain tissue samples by immunohistochemical staining. TNC expression was found to be highly associated with the grade of astrocytoma. It has a high expression level in most of the grade III astrocytomas and GBMs analyzed and a very low expression in most grade II astrocytomas, whereas it is undetectable in grade I astrocytomas and normal brain tissues. Double-immunofluorescence staining for TNC and CD133 in GBM tissues revealed that there was a high overlap between theses two positive populations. The results were further confirmed by flow cytometry analysis of TNC and CD133 in GBM-derived stem-like neurospheres in vitro. A limiting dilution assay demonstrated that the sphere formation ability of CD133(+)/TNC(+) and CD133(-)/TNC(+) cell populations is much higher than that of the CD133(+)/TNC(-) and CD133(-)/TNC(-) populations. These results suggest that TNC is not only a potential prognostic marker for GBM but also a potential marker for glioma CSCs, where the TNC(+) population is identified as a CSC population overlapping with part of the CD133(-) cell population.
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain tumor, with dismal survival outcomes. Recently, cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been demonstrated to play a role in therapeutic resistance and are considered to be the most likely cause of cancer relapse. The identification of CSCs is an important step toward finding new and effective ways to treat GBM. Tenascin-C (TNC) protein has been identified as a potential marker for CSCs in gliomas based on previous work. Here, we have investigated the expression of TNC in tissue microarrays including 17 GBMs, 18 WHO grade III astrocytomas, 15 WHO grade II astrocytomas, 4 WHO grade I astrocytomas, and 7 normal brain tissue samples by immunohistochemical staining. TNC expression was found to be highly associated with the grade of astrocytoma. It has a high expression level in most of the grade III astrocytomas and GBMs analyzed and a very low expression in most grade II astrocytomas, whereas it is undetectable in grade I astrocytomas and normal brain tissues. Double-immunofluorescence staining for TNC and CD133 in GBM tissues revealed that there was a high overlap between theses two positive populations. The results were further confirmed by flow cytometry analysis of TNC and CD133 in GBM-derived stem-like neurospheres in vitro. A limiting dilution assay demonstrated that the sphere formation ability of CD133(+)/TNC(+) and CD133(-)/TNC(+) cell populations is much higher than that of the CD133(+)/TNC(-) and CD133(-)/TNC(-) populations. These results suggest that TNC is not only a potential prognostic marker for GBM but also a potential marker for glioma CSCs, where the TNC(+) population is identified as a CSC population overlapping with part of the CD133(-) cell population.
Entities:
Keywords:
GBM; cancer stem cell; marker; tenascin-C; tissue microarrays
Glioma is the most
common primary central nervous system tumor.
Astrocytic tumor, the most common type of glioma, is classified into
four grades, according to different grades of malignancy (I–IV),
by the Word Health Organization (WHO).[1] Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), a WHO grade IV astrocytic tumor,
is the most devastating primary humanbrain tumor with a high morbidity
and mortality among patients.[2] Even when
treated with a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy,
patients with GBM still have a very poor long-term outcome, with a
median survival of 14.6 months.[3,4] The poor survival is
primarily due to the recurrence of tumor, which is resistant to standard
therapies.[5] Thus, new strategies to treat
GBM are urgently needed.Accumulating evidence has demonstrated
that a small population
of stem-like cells, termed cancer stem cells (CSC), in tumors are
responsible for tumor initiation and ongoing growth.[6] These cells contribute to therapeutic resistance and are
considered to be the most likely cause of cancer relapse.[5,7,8] CSCs have been identified and
validated in various solid tumors such as breast, colon, pancreas,
and liver.[9−12] They have also been shown to exist in GBM,[13−16] and recent work has shown the
possibility for treatment of brain tumors by targeting CSCs.[17−20] The identification of new tumor stem cell markers for GBM is essential
for diagnosis and effective treatment of malignant brain tumors.There have been efforts to identify CSC markers in GBM.[21−23] CD133 has been identified and widely used as a marker to characterize
CSC population in GBMs.[18,21,24] However, CD133 expression is observed in mature luminal ductal epithelial
cells in various organs of adults, indicating that CD133 may not be
a suitable organ-specific CSC marker.[25] Other evidence now suggests that CD133 may serve as a CSC marker
in only a subgroup of GBM.[26] Moreover,
CD133– cells also have the capability to generate
GBM tumors in immunodeficientnude mice or rats.[27,28] These issues underscore the need for additional markers to identify
CSCs in GBM. Recently, CD90 was identified as a marker for GBM CSCs
in primary human high-grade gliomas using tissue microarrays.[23] The expression level of CD90 was highly correlated
with WHO grades and was significantly higher than that in low-grade
gliomas. Interestingly, CD90 and CD133 markers were coexpressed in
GBM, where 100% of the CD133+ cells were also positive
for CD90, but only part of the CD90+ cells were positive
for CD133, indicating that the CD133+ stem-like cells are
a subpopulation of CD90+ cells in GBMs in vivo.[23] Other suggested CSC surface markers that have
been identified, such as CD15 and NG2, are still under investigation.[29,30]Tenascin-C (TNC) is a large extracellular matrix (ECM) glycoprotein,
characterized by a six-armed quaternary structure and a modular construction.[31] It is composed of four subunits: a cysteine-rich
amino terminal domain, a sequence of epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like
repeats, a number of fibronectin type III repeats, and a carboxy-terminal
domain homologous to fibrinogen. Its deregulated high expression is
causally linked to many diseases, including heart failure, thrombosis,
atherosclerosis, and cancer.[32] TNC was
originally discovered as a glioma–mesenchymal extracellular
matrix antigen that is ubiquitously expressed in glioblastomas but
not in normal brains.[33] The distribution
pattern of TNC in GBM showed that it plays a role in angiogenesis
and tumor cell proliferation.[34] TNC contributes
to the generation of a stem cell niche, which is important to the
development of neural stem cells.[35,36] Recent work
also demonstrated that TNC is a promising target of GBM therapy by
interference RNA intervention (iRNAi).[37] Thus, TNC may play an important role in GBM.In previous work
using mass spectrometry analysis, the expression
level of TNC in a GBM-derived stem neurosphere line was shown to be
dramatically higher than that in three traditional adherent GBM cell
lines, indicating that TNC may be a potential marker for CSCs in GBMs.[38] TNC has also been identified as a marker in
neuroblastoma.[39] In the current work, we
showed the potential of TNC as a marker for glioma CSCs using tissue
microarray analysis, where a significant number of samples from different
grades of glioma could be studied. The stem-like cell characterization
of TNC positive cells was then further demonstrated using in vitro
cell sorting and a limiting dilution assay to monitor sphere formation
to understand the role of TNC as a potential CSC marker. It is shown
that TNC is not only a potential prognostic marker for GBM but also
a potential marker for glioma CSCs.
Materials and Methods
Tissue
Samples
Tissue microarray (TMA) samples were
obtained from US Biomax (Rockville, MD; cat. nos. GL722, T174, and
GL807). In total, 61 samples were analyzed in these experiments, including
17 GBM samples (age: 35 ± 18 years; 7 females and 10 males),
18 WHO grade III astrocytomas (age: 46 ± 11 years; 7 females
and 11 males), 15 WHO grade II astrocytomas (age: 41 ± 12 years;
6 females and 9 males), 4 WHO grade I astrocytomas (age: 41 ±
8 years; 1 female and 3 males), and 7 normal brain tissue samples
(age: 38 ± 8 years; 6 females and 1 male). The brain tissue samples
originated from different donors, and each sample had at least two
replicates. The glioma tissue sections were from the tumor areas and
do not include the adjacent normal tissues.
Protein Extraction from
Tissue Sections
Paraformaldehyde-fixed
GBM sections were obtained from University Hospital at the University
of Michigan with approval from the Internal Review Board. They were
thawed for 20–30 s at room temperature and rinsed with PBS
before protein extraction. The FASP protein extraction kit was used
to extract protein from tissue sections (Protein Discovery, Inc.,
Knoxville, TN). Lysis buffer containing 4% SDS, 0.1 M DTT, and protease
inhibitors was added onto the tissue section slides (US Biomax, Inc.,
Rockville, MD) and incubated for 5 min. The collected tissue cells
were boiled using a 100 °C water bath for 5 min. The samples
were centrifuged at 15 000g for 10 min, and the supernatant
was stored at −80 °C for western blotting analysis.
Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tissue Microarrays
Immunohistochemical
staining was performed using tissue microarray
samples. The paraffin-embedded tissue arrays with 1.5 mm core diameter
and 5 μm thickness were dewaxed in xylene for 10 min twice and
rehydrated through a series of alcohol solutions (200 proof, Sigma-Aldrich,
St. Louis, MO) (100% ethanol twice, 90% ethanol, and 70% ethanol,
5 min each) to water. Then, the slides were boiled for 15 min in citrate
buffer (Teknova, Hollister, CA) at pH 6.0 for antigen retrieval. After
returning to room temperature, endogenous peroxidase activity was
blocked with 3% H2O2 in methanol for 10 min.
The TMAs were then rinsed with water and PBS and subsequently blocked
with 2% BSA and incubated with rabbit anti-humanTenascin-C monoclonal
antibody (1:100 dilution, Abcam, Cambridge, MA) overnight at 4 °C
followed by incubation with a goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to horseradish
peroxidase (1:250 Abcam, Cambridge, MA). Immunodetection was performed
using DAB solution (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Hematoxylin
counterstain was used to visualize nuclei. The TNC expression level
in each tissue section was assessed in non-necrotic areas of three
separate microscopic fields of view under a magnification of 200×
and was represented by the mean of the percentage of TNC+ cells. The results were confirmed by a pathologist.
Double-Immunofluorescence
Staining of TNC and CD133
Double-immunoflourescence staining
was performed using tissue microarrays.
According to the different properties of each individual antibody,
a simultaneous procedure was used for the staining of TNC and CD133.
Briefly, the TMAs were dewaxed in xylene for 10 min twice and rehydrated
through a series of alcohol solutions to water, followed by boiling
for 15 min in 100 mM citrate buffer at pH 6.0 for antigen retrieval.
After incubation with 1% BSA in PBS for 1 h at room temperature to
block nonspecific binding, a mixture of rabbit anti-humanTNC (1:80
dilution, Abcam, Cambridge, MA; cat. no. ab108930) monoclonal antibody
and mouse anti-humanCD133 (1:100 dilution, Millipore, Temecula, CA;
cat. no. MAB 4399) monoclonal antibody was incubated with the slides
overnight at 4 °C. DyLight 488 anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) and DyLight
549 anti-mouse IgG (H + L) secondary antibodies (1:150 dilution, Vector
Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) were used for immunofluorescence detection,
and 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) counterstain was used to visualize
nuclei. Between each step, three washes were applied with PBST for
10 min each. Finally, TMA slides were dehydrated in alcohol and coverslipped
using a CC/Mount permanent mounting medium (Sigma, St. Louis, MO).
Cell Culture
HSR-GBM1 neurosphere cells were derived
from a primary GBM patient and have been propagated for hundreds of
passages as neurospheres in vitro to enrich the cancer stem-like cell
population.[18,40] HSR-GBM1 neurosphere cells were
used for a coupled cell sorting and limiting dilution assay of sphere
formation. As described before, NeuroCult proliferation medium (Stem
Cell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada) was supplemented with 10 ng/mL
EGF (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ), 10 ng/mL FGFb (PeproTech), and 2
μg/mL heparin (Sigma).[14,18] Differentiation of
the neurospheres was achieved by plating 0.9–1 × 105 cells/cm2 on a polyornithine (15 μg/mL)
coated culture plate and maintaining them in the NeuroCult differentiation
medium (Stem Cell Technologies) as described previously.[14]
Western Blotting Analysis
An equal
amount of protein
from different samples was separated by 4–15% SDS-PAGE and
transferred to poly(vinylidene difluoride) membranes (PVDF, Bio-Rad,
Hercules, CA). The membranes were blocked for 1 h by 2% milk (Bio-Rad)
in PBST (0.1% Tween-20 in PBS) and then incubated with the following
antibodies overnight at 4 °C: anti-TNC (Abcam), anti-CD133 (Millipore),
and anti-β-actin (Abcam). After being washed three times with
PBST, the membranes were incubated with peroxidase-conjugated secondary
antibody IgG (H + L) for 1 h, washed another three times with PBST,
and then detected by Supersignal West Pico chemiluminescent substrate
(Thermo Scientific).
Cell Sorting and Limiting Dilution Assay
of Sphere Formation
Fluorescence-activated cell sorting experiments
were performed
at the Flow Cytometry Core at the University of Michigan in triplicate.
To execute the cell sorting experiments, HSR-GBM1 neurospheres were
first dissociated into single cells. TNC (Abcam, Cambridge, MA; cat.
no. ab108930) monoclonal antibody, DyLight 488 anti-rabbit IgG (H
+ L) (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), and CD133-PE (Miltenyi
Biotec, Auburn, CA; cat. no. 130-080-801) antibody for FACS were applied
to cell staining according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Cells were gated against isotype controls (mouse IgG1-PE, cat. no.
130-092-212, for CD133 and rabbit IgG monclonal antibody, cat. no.
ab 172730, for TNC) and analyzed for CD133+/TNC+, CD133–/TNC+, CD133+/TNC–, and CD133–/TNC– cell populations. Each population of CD133+/TNC+, CD133–/TNC+, CD133+/TNC–, and CD133–/TNC– was sorted into 96-wells for 6 days before examination of sphere
formation. The percent of wells that did not form spheres (y axis) was plotted against the number of cells plated per
well (x axis). The minimum number of cells required
to form spheres was calculated from the x intercept
of the graph.
Statistical Analysis
The Student’s t-test was used to analyze the difference in pairwise comparison
for
TNC expression levels among astrocytoma WHO grade I, grade II, grade
III, and grade IV and normal brain tissues. Statistical significance
was defined as p < 0.05.
Results
TNC Expression
in GBM Tissues
The expression level
of TNC in a GBM-derived stem neurosphere line was shown to be dramatically
higher than that in three traditional adherent GBM cell lines using
mass spectrometry analysis.[38] To detect
TNC expression in GBM tissues, we extracted protein samples from fresh
primary GBM biopsy. Western blotting analysis was applied to analyze
GBM tissues and normal brain tissues. The results showed a strong
expression of TNC in GBM tissues but not in normal brain tissues,
where a dramatically different expression level existed between GBM
and normal brain tissues (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Western blot
analysis of TNC expression in GBM (Glioblastoma multiforme)
tissues and normal controls. A strong expression is present in GBM
patients, whereas in the normal brain tissue, TNC is not detected.
Western blot
analysis of TNC expression in GBM (Glioblastoma multiforme)
tissues and normal controls. A strong expression is present in GBM
patients, whereas in the normal brain tissue, TNC is not detected.
TNC Expression Level Is
Highly Correlated with Glioma Tumor
Grade
To determine the relevance of aberrant TNC expression
in GBM progression, we investigated the expression of TNC using tissue
microarrays containing 54 gliomas of different WHO grades and seven
normal subjects by immunohistochemical staining. TNC expression was
not detectable in normal brains (Figure 2A),
WHO grade I astrocytomas (Figure 2B), and part
of WHO grade II astrocytomas (Figure 2C). In
contrast, it has a dramatically higher expression in all analyzed
WHO grade III astrocytomas (Figure 2D) and
GBMs (Figure 2E). The results reveal that TNC
expression was highly correlated with the grade of astrocytoma, where
tumors of higher grades showed higher levels of immunoreactivity.
Figure 2
Immunohistochemical
staining of human TNC in different grades of
astrocytomas and normal brains. Paraffin-embedded tissue microarrays
(TMA) of glioma were analyzed using anti-TNC monoclonal antibody.
A representative figure of each TMA is shown. TNC was not detected
in normal brain tissue (A) or astrocytoma WHO grade I (B). In contrast,
low or moderate staining for TNC was detected in astrocytoma WHO grade
grade II (C), and moderate or strong staining for TNC expression was
observed in anaplastic astrocytoma WHO grade III (D) and GBM WHO grade
IV (E). Hematoxylin counterstain was used to visualize nuclei. The
TNC expression level in each tissue section was assessed in non-necrotic
areas of three separate microscopic fields of view under a magnification
of 200× and is represented by the mean of the percentage of TNC+ cells. The results were confirmed by a pathologist.
Immunohistochemical
staining of humanTNC in different grades of
astrocytomas and normal brains. Paraffin-embedded tissue microarrays
(TMA) of glioma were analyzed using anti-TNC monoclonal antibody.
A representative figure of each TMA is shown. TNC was not detected
in normal brain tissue (A) or astrocytoma WHO grade I (B). In contrast,
low or moderate staining for TNC was detected in astrocytoma WHO grade
grade II (C), and moderate or strong staining for TNC expression was
observed in anaplastic astrocytoma WHO grade III (D) and GBM WHO grade
IV (E). Hematoxylin counterstain was used to visualize nuclei. The
TNC expression level in each tissue section was assessed in non-necrotic
areas of three separate microscopic fields of view under a magnification
of 200× and is represented by the mean of the percentage of TNC+ cells. The results were confirmed by a pathologist.TNC expression was further semiquantitatively
analyzed by calculating
the percentage of TNC+ cells in the tissue section. The
relative expression level of TNC in normal and different glioma grades
are shown in Figure 3. The percentage of TNC+ cells was zero in all of the normal brain and WHO grade I
astrocytoma tissues. In WHO grade II astrocytoma tissue samples, TNC
was not detectable in part of the samples (5 of 15, 33%) and was expressed
at weak levels (<16%) in most of the samples (7 of 15, 47%) and
at medium levels (>16%, <45%) in a few tissue samples (3 of
15,
20%). In the case of high-grade gliomas, TNC was detectable in all
of the samples tested. No significant difference in TNC expression
was observed between grade III astrocytomas and GBMs (p > 0.05). However, the TNC expression level in high-grade gliomas
(grade III astrocytomas and GBMs) was significantly higher than that
in low-grade gliomas (p < 0.001, grade I and grade
II astrocytomas). A significant difference of TNC expression level
also existed between grade I and grade II astrocytomas. The results
showed that TNC was not expressed in normal and grade I astrocytomaspatients but that its expression level is highly correlated with late
grades of malignancy.
Figure 3
Scatter plot of TNC expression levels in 54 patients with
different
grades of astrocytomas and 7 normal subjects. The percentage of TNC+ cells of each tissue sample represents TNC expression level
on the y axis. TNC expression levels were found to
be highly associated with the grade of astrocytoma. TNC has a high
expression level in most of the grade III astrocytomas and GBMs analyzed
by immunohistochemical staining, a very low expression in most of
the grade II astrocytomas, and undetectable expression in grade I
astrocytomas and normal brain tissues.
Scatter plot of TNC expression levels in 54 patients with
different
grades of astrocytomas and 7 normal subjects. The percentage of TNC+ cells of each tissue sample represents TNC expression level
on the y axis. TNC expression levels were found to
be highly associated with the grade of astrocytoma. TNC has a high
expression level in most of the grade III astrocytomas and GBMs analyzed
by immunohistochemical staining, a very low expression in most of
the grade II astrocytomas, and undetectable expression in grade I
astrocytomas and normal brain tissues.
TNC+ Cell Population Has a High Overlap with the
CD133+ Cell Population
CD133 has been widely used
as a marker to characterize CSC population in GBMs.[18,21,24] To determine the relation between the TNC+ and CD133+ cell populations, we performed double-immunofluorescence
staining for TNC and CD133 in primary GBM tissue sections. As shown
in Figure 4, in most of the GBM tissue cells,
CD133 was co-expressed with TNC, where most TNC+ cells
were also CD133+ cells, but there are still some TNC+ cells that were not positive for CD133. This indicates that
the TNC+ cell population has a high overlap with the CD133+ cell population.
Figure 4
Double-immunofluorescence staining for TNC and
CD133 in a GBM tissue
section. TNC expression has a high overlap with CD133 expression,
where the coexpression is shown in yellow in the merged image. DAPI
counterstain was used to visualize nuclei. Scale bar, 100 μm
(200× magnification).
Double-immunofluorescence staining for TNC and
CD133 in a GBM tissue
section. TNC expression has a high overlap with CD133 expression,
where the coexpression is shown in yellow in the merged image. DAPI
counterstain was used to visualize nuclei. Scale bar, 100 μm
(200× magnification).The expression of TNC and CD133 was further investigated
in a GBM
cell line. Flow cytometry analysis was executed in a GBM-derived stem-like
neurosphere line, HSR-GBM1, which has been extensively used in CSC
studies.[27,40,41] CD133+/TNC+, CD133–/TNC+, CD133+/TNC–, and CD133–/TNC– cell populations were isolated from GBM-derived
stem-like neurosphere cells by FACS. The percentage of each subpopulation
is shown in Figure 5. The results show that
TNC was expressed in about 55% of HSR-GBM1 cells, whereas CD133 was
expressed in about 56% of HSR-GBM1 cells. The overlap between the
TNC+ and CD133+ cell populations reached 43%
(Figure 5).
Figure 5
Flow cytometry sorting process to isolate
CD133+/TNC+, CD133–/TNC+, CD133+/TNC–, and CD133–/TNC– cell populations based on the
expression of TNC and CD133. The HSR-GBM1
cell line was used in this experiment. The results show that TNC was
expressed in about 55% of HSR-GBM1 cells, whereas CD133 was expressed
in about 56% of HSR-GBM1 cells. The overlap between the TNC+ and CD133+ cell populations reached 43%.
Flow cytometry sorting process to isolate
CD133+/TNC+, CD133–/TNC+, CD133+/TNC–, and CD133–/TNC– cell populations based on the
expression of TNC and CD133. The HSR-GBM1
cell line was used in this experiment. The results show that TNC was
expressed in about 55% of HSR-GBM1 cells, whereas CD133 was expressed
in about 56% of HSR-GBM1 cells. The overlap between the TNC+ and CD133+ cell populations reached 43%.
TNC Expression Level Decreased along with
the Differentiation
of GBM Cancer Stem Cells
To investigate the TNC expression
level changes in the differentiation process of GBM cancer stem cells,
undifferentiated HSR-GBM1 stem-like neurospheres were induced to differentiate
for 7 to 10 days.[40] After collecting the
undifferentiated and differentiated cell samples, we measured the
changes in the expression level of TNC during the differentiation
process of GBM cancer stem cells using western blotting. We found
that most stem-like cells were lost after differentiation of HSR-GBM1
cells. The reduced expression of the known GBM stem cell marker CD133
confirmed this differentiation (Figure 6A),
which is consistent with previous reports.[40,42] The results of western blotting analysis showed that the TNC expression
level decreased dramatically in the differentiated cells compared
with that in undifferentiated stem-like cells, with a similar differential
expression pattern to CD133 (Figure 6A). The
results indicate that the expression levels of both TNC and CD133
were decreased along with the differentiation of stem-like cells,
where TNC may represent a new marker for CSCs in GBM.
Figure 6
TNC is a potential maker
for GBM stem cells. (A) TNC has the same
expression pattern with CD133 along with the differentiation of the
stem-like HSR-GBM1 neurospheres, where expression levels of both TNC
and CD133 were dramatically reduced in the differentiated cells compared
to that in stem-like HSR-GBM1 neurospheres. Stem-like represents the
stem-like HSR-GBM1 neurospheres; diff represents the differentiated
HSR-GBM1 cells. (B) The ability of CD133+/TNC+, CD133–/TNC+, CD133+/TNC–, and CD133–/TNC– cell populations to form spheres was analyzed. y axis, percent of wells that did not form spheres; x axis, the number of cells plated per well. (C) The minimum number
of cells required to form spheres for each population of HSR-GBM1
neurospheres. Compared to the TNC– cell population,
the TNC+ cell population (including CD133+/TNC+ and CD133–/TNC+) needs a much
lower number of cells to form spheres.
TNC is a potential maker
for GBM stem cells. (A) TNC has the same
expression pattern with CD133 along with the differentiation of the
stem-like HSR-GBM1 neurospheres, where expression levels of both TNC
and CD133 were dramatically reduced in the differentiated cells compared
to that in stem-like HSR-GBM1 neurospheres. Stem-like represents the
stem-like HSR-GBM1 neurospheres; diff represents the differentiated
HSR-GBM1 cells. (B) The ability of CD133+/TNC+, CD133–/TNC+, CD133+/TNC–, and CD133–/TNC– cell populations to form spheres was analyzed. y axis, percent of wells that did not form spheres; x axis, the number of cells plated per well. (C) The minimum number
of cells required to form spheres for each population of HSR-GBM1
neurospheres. Compared to the TNC– cell population,
the TNC+ cell population (including CD133+/TNC+ and CD133–/TNC+) needs a much
lower number of cells to form spheres.
TNC Is a Novel Candidate Marker for GBM Cancer Stem Cells
To determine whether TNC is a novel marker for GBM cancer stem
cells, we performed a limiting dilution assay to evaluate the self-renewal
ability of the TNC+ cells. GBM-derived stem-like neurosphere
cells were fractioned into CD133+/TNC+, CD133–/TNC+, CD133+/TNC–, and CD133–/TNC– cell populations
by FACS. The ability of each cell population to form spheres was tested,
where the TNC+ cell population has the strongest capacity
for sphere formation regardless of CD133 status. On the basis of the
data, the percent of wells that do not form spheres (y axis) is plotted against the number of cells plated per well (x axis), where the best line is drawn among the points based
on a logarithmic function (Figure 6B). The
number of cells required to give rise to colonies is calculated from
the x intercept of the graph. The minimum number
of cells required for sphere formation for CD133–/TNC+ and CD133+/TNC+ was 52 and
54, respectively. Compared to the TNC+ cell population,
the TNC– cell population (CD133+/TNC– and CD133–/TNC–) requires 2–3-fold more cells to form spheres (Figure 6B,C). These results demonstrated that TNC+ cells had a much higher stemness potential than the TNC– cells, which confirmed that TNC is a marker for GBM CSCs. Also,
the CD133+/TNC+ cell population required a similar
number of cells to form spheres as that of the CD133–/TNC+ cell population. Thus, the TNC+ population
as a CSC population contains part of CD133– CSCs.
Discussion
The cancer stem cell hypothesis claims that cancer
arises from
a tumorigenic subpopulation with self-renewing capacity and stem cell-like
properties, designated cancer stem cells. The ability to find cell-surface
markers that will allow the prospective identification and isolation
of these cells is critical to CSC research. To date, many studies
have relied on the enrichment of CSCs based on the cell surface protein
CD133.[43] However, recent reports have indicated
that CD133– GBM cells can form tumors and that the
expression of CD133 may be cell cycle regulated.[44,45] These issues underscore the need for additional markers to identify
CSCs in GBM.Extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins are key structural
components
of the perivascular niche and regulate normal stem cell and tumor
proliferation and migration.[40,46] TNC is an ECM protein
known to correlate with prognosis in patients with glioblastoma, probably
by stimulation of invasion and tumor angiogenesis.[47] TNC also contributes to the regulation of the self-renewal
and output of the stem cell population.[48] Its functions suggest that TNC plays an important role in GBM tumor
initiation. In the current study, it has been shown that TNC is a
potential candidate marker for cancer stem cells in glioblastoma.Tissue microarrays were used to analyze the expression of TNC in
glioma tissues of different grades, and TNC expression was found to
be highly correlated with the grade of astrocytoma, where tumors of
higher grades showed higher levels of immunoreactivity (Figures 2 and 3). TNC was barely detectable
in normal and astrocytoma WHO grade I. Western blotting analysis also
confirmed these results (Figure 1). These observations
suggest that the TNC expression level may be an indicator of the aggressiveness
of gliomas, and it appears to be a promising new prognostic marker
for gliomas. In the process of differentiation of stem-like cells,
TNC expression levels were decreased along with the differentiation
of stem-like cells (Figure 6A). A limiting
dilution assay further demonstrated the ability of the TNC+ cell population to form spheres (Figure 6B,C). These findings suggest that TNC is a novel marker for CSCs
in GBM and overlaps with part of the CD133– cell
population.It should be noted that, in contrast to highly differentiated
low-grade
gliomas, GBMs are more undifferentiated and therefore are more likely
to contain undifferentiated CSCs. Our analysis showed that TNC has
a high expression level in most of the grade III astrocytomas and
GBMs analyzed by immunohistochemical staining and a very low expression
in most grade II astrocytomas, whereas it is undetectable in grade
I astrocytomas and normal brain tissues. However, TNC expression level
is very heterogeneous in patients, with the expression level varying
from only 7% to more than 80%. The average expression level is about
34% in all of the patients of WHO grade III astrocytomas and about
45% in GBM patients (Figure 3). The TNC expression
pattern is also consistent with previous reports.[49] FACS analysis also demonstrated that TNC has a high expression
level in the HSR-GBM1 cell line, with a similar percentage of TNC+ cells (55%) compared to that of CD133+ cells (56%)
(Figure 5).GBM displays significant
heterogeneity, so it is unlikely that
a single marker will absolutely enrich CSCs. Recently, a number of
groups have suggested that different CSCs can coexist in the same
tumor.[7] Even within a single tumor, different
pools of CSCs may be present.[50] It is therefore
likely that tumors have variability not only in the fraction of TNC+ cells and other CSCs but also in how these populations overlap.
In this study, we demonstrated that the TNC+ cell population
has a 43% overlap with the CD133+ cell population in the
HSR-GBM1 cell line and overlaps with part of the CD133– cell population. Previous investigations have indicated that CD133– cells also have the capability to generate GBM tumors
in immunodeficientnude mice or rats.[27,28] Therefore,
TNC may be a more general marker than CD133. The CD133+ stem-like cells are a subpopulation of CD90+ cells in
GBMs.[23] It might be interesting to investigate
the relationship between the CD90+ and TNC+ cell
populations. Unfortunately, the appropriate antibodies are unavailable
to perform double staining.Our findings may provide some potential
therapeutic implication
for GBM. TNC is also an extracellular matrix protein, which makes
it easier to enter into the bloodstream. TNC already has been shown
to be significantly elevated in serum in cancer contexts, such as
in liver and ovarian cancers.[51,52] The magnitude and mechanisms
of TNC secretion by astrocytes have also been investigated.[53] It would be interesting to investigate the difference
in TNC expression in serum associated with GBM.In conclusion,
we have shown that TNC expression is significantly
elevated with increasing grades of malignancy and decreases with the
differentiation of GBM CSCs. It can be used to distinguish high-grade
gliomas from low-grade gliomas and normal brains. Furthermore, it
has been shown that TNC is a novel marker for CSCs in GBM and overlaps
with part of the CD133– cell population, so TNC
itself may be an important therapeutic target for GBMs.
Authors: Shideng Bao; Qiulian Wu; Zhizhong Li; Sith Sathornsumetee; Hui Wang; Roger E McLendon; Anita B Hjelmeland; Jeremy N Rich Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Jintang He; Yashu Liu; Thant Zhu; Jianhui Zhu; Francesco Dimeco; Angelo L Vescovi; Jason A Heth; Karin M Muraszko; Xing Fan; David M Lubman Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2011-12-27 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Jintang He; Yashu Liu; Thant S Zhu; Xiaolei Xie; Mark A Costello; Caroline E Talsma; Callie G Flack; Jessica G Crowley; Francesco Dimeco; Angelo L Vescovi; Xing Fan; David M Lubman Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2010-12-16 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Tatyana N Ignatova; Valery G Kukekov; Eric D Laywell; Oleg N Suslov; Frank D Vrionis; Dennis A Steindler Journal: Glia Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 7.452
Authors: Jian Wang; Per Ø Sakariassen; Oleg Tsinkalovsky; Heike Immervoll; Stig Ove Bøe; Agnete Svendsen; Lars Prestegarden; Gro Røsland; Frits Thorsen; Linda Stuhr; Anders Molven; Rolf Bjerkvig; Per Ø Enger Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2008-02-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Alex A Pollen; Tomasz J Nowakowski; Jiadong Chen; Hanna Retallack; Carmen Sandoval-Espinosa; Cory R Nicholas; Joe Shuga; Siyuan John Liu; Michael C Oldham; Aaron Diaz; Daniel A Lim; Anne A Leyrat; Jay A West; Arnold R Kriegstein Journal: Cell Date: 2015-09-24 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Eric N Horst; Michael E Bregenzer; Pooja Mehta; Catherine S Snyder; Taylor Repetto; Yang Yang-Hartwich; Geeta Mehta Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2021-04-30 Impact factor: 10.633
Authors: Ana Pires; Alexander Greenshields-Watson; Emma Jones; Andrew Godkin; Awen Gallimore; Kathryn Smart; Sarah N Lauder; Michelle Somerville; Stefan Milutinovic; Howard Kendrick; James P Hindley; Rhiannon French; Matthew J Smalley; William J Watkins; Robert Andrews Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 12.020