Literature DB >> 25469283

Assessment of health-related quality of life of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma following esophagectomy using EORTC quality of life questionnaires.

Hongchang Shen1, Jue Wang2, Wenhuan Li1, Weiwei Yi1, Weibo Wang1.   

Abstract

Esophageal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality and surgery is currently the main treatment modality for resectable esophageal cancer. To assess health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) following esophagectomy, 62 consecutive patients with middle ESCC were randomly assigned into hand video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (HVATS) (n=33) and Ivor-Lewis surgery (ILS) (n=29) groups. Quality of life questionnaires (QLQ)-C30 and QLQ-OES18, published by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, were used prior to treatment and at regular intervals until 6 months following surgery. The results of QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18 demonstrated that i) patients with comorbidities and advanced tumor stage (III-IV) exhibited increased risk of poor HRQL, while their gender, age, body mass index and anastomosis location were not associated with HRQL at 6 months after surgery; ii) all the patients had worse functional, symptom and global scores within 6 months after surgery; iii) patients in the HVATS group had similar baseline functional and symptom scores to those of patients in the ILS group; however, their functional and global scores were higher and their symptom scores were lower compared to those of patients in the ILS group; iv) the HRQL of patients in the HVATS group returned to preoperative levels within a shorter time period compared to patients in the ILS group. There were significant differences in global health, physical functioning, fatigue and pain scales between the two groups. In QLQ-OES18, the dysphagia and gastroesophageal reflux scales were improved in both the HVATS and ILS groups, but no significant differences were observed between the two groups. In addition, the overall survival rate was similar in the two groups. Taken together, our findings indicated that HVATS is a safe procedure, associated with less disturbance to short-term HRQL compared to ILS. Therefore, it appears reasonable to select HVATS for patients with early-stage middle esophageal cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  esophageal neoplasms; esophagectomy; hand video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; quality of life

Year:  2014        PMID: 25469283      PMCID: PMC4251175          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2014.434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  14 in total

1.  Pulmonary function after lobectomy: video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy.

Authors:  M Nakata; H Saeki; N Yokoyama; A Kurita; W Takiyama; S Takashima
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Peter C Enzinger; Robert J Mayer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Hand-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery causes less postoperative pain than limited thoracotomy after cessation of epidural analgesia.

Authors:  Joseph M Paiva; Gavin M Wright
Journal:  Heart Lung Circ       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.975

4.  [Clinical therapeutic effect of esophageal carcinoma with hand video assisted surgery].

Authors:  Jia-jun Du; Long Meng; Jing-han Chen; Zhong-min Peng; Lei Wang; Lin Zhang; Xiao-Hang Wang
Journal:  Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2007-06-15

Review 5.  Updates on esophageal and gastric cancers.

Authors:  Amy Gallo; Charles Cha
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Initial experience and result of thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Somkiat Sunpaweravong; Siripong Chewatanakornkul; Sakchai Ruangsin
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2008-08

7.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a teaching hospital's first year experience.

Authors:  T Fabian; J T Martin; A A McKelvey; J A Federico
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.429

8.  Test/retest study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire.

Authors:  M J Hjermstad; S D Fossa; K Bjordal; S Kaasa
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Video-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Toshiaki Shichinohe; Satoshi Hirano; Satoshi Kondo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Quality of life measurement in patients with oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  J M Blazeby; M H Williams; S T Brookes; D Alderson; J R Farndon
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  5 in total

1.  Eating Behaviors of Postoperative Esophageal Cancer Patients During the First Year After Surgery.

Authors:  Yukina Ueda; Masami Chujo
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 1.641

Review 2.  Symptom Management for Patients With Esophageal Cancer After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Laura A Pachella; Susan Knippel
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2016-11-01

3.  The change of health-related quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Xiaomei Yang; Donghong Geng; Yingfei Duan; Junke Fu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.754

4.  Network analysis of miRNA targeting m6A-related genes in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Lili Li; Rongrong Xie; Qichun Wei
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Effect of Prophylactic Radiotherapy on Patients with Stage II-III Esophageal Cancer after Esophageal Cancer Radical Operation and Influencing Factors in Its Recurrence.

Authors:  Dan Guo; Kang Zheng
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 4.375

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.