Literature DB >> 25469049

Xeroderma pigmentosum group D polymorphisms and esophageal cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis based on case-control studies.

Rong Yang1, Chong Zhang1, Armah Malik1, Zhi-Da Shen1, Jian Hu1, Yi-He Wu1.   

Abstract

AIM: To clarify the effects of the xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD) Asp312Asn and Lys751Gln gene polymorphisms on the risk of esophageal cancer (EC).
METHODS: A computerised literature search was conducted to identify the relevant studies from the PUBMED and EMBASE databases, reviews, and reference lists of relevant articles. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the associations between the XPD Asp312Asn and/or Lys751Gln polymorphisms and EC susceptibility. Statistical analyses were performed using the software Stata 12.0. A fixed or random effects model was selected based on a heterogeneity test. Publication bias was estimated using funnel plots and Egger's linear regression method. Subgroup analyses were performed based on histological type and ethnicity.
RESULTS: Thirteen case-control studies with a total of 10 comparisons for the Asp312Asn polymorphism, including 2373 cases and 3175 controls, and 15 comparisons for the Lys751Gln polymorphism, including 3226 cases and 5237 controls, were recruited for the meta-analysis. In terms of the XPD Asp312Asn polymorphism, significantly increased EC risks were identified in the Asp/Asn vs Asp/Asp comparison (OR = 1.17, 95%CI: 1.02-1.33, P = 0.03) and in the dominant-model comparison (Asn/Asn+Asp/Asn vs Asp/Asp: OR = 1.18, 95%CI: 1.04-1.34, P = 0.01). However, no significant associations were found in the Asn/Asn vs Asp/Asp comparison (OR = 1.30, 95%CI: 1.00-1.70, P = 0.05) or in the recessive-model comparison (Asn/Asn vs Asp/Asn + Asp/Asp: OR = 1.17, 95%CI: 0.91-1.50, P = 0.22). In terms of the XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism, a significant association with EC susceptibility was found under the recessive model (Gln/Gln vs Lys/Gln+Lys/Lys: OR = 1.21, 95%CI: 1.02-1.43, P = 0.03). However, no associations were identified in the other comparisons (co-dominant model: Lys/Gln vs Lys/Lys: OR = 1.11, 95%CI: 0.94-1.31, P = 0.20; Gln/Gln vs Lys/Lys: OR = 1.31, 95%CI: 0.98-1.75, P = 0.07; dominant model: OR = 1.14, 95%CI: 0.96-1.35, P = 0.14).
CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that the XPD Asp312Asn and Lys751Gln gene polymorphisms are associated with a significantly increased risk for EC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal cancer; Meta-analysis; Polymorphism; Xeroderma pigmentosum group D

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25469049      PMCID: PMC4248224          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  36 in total

Review 1.  Genome maintenance mechanisms are critical for preventing cancer as well as other aging-associated diseases.

Authors:  Jan H J Hoeijmakers
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 5.432

2.  XPD helicase structures and activities: insights into the cancer and aging phenotypes from XPD mutations.

Authors:  Li Fan; Jill O Fuss; Quen J Cheng; Andrew S Arvai; Michal Hammel; Victoria A Roberts; Priscilla K Cooper; John A Tainer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  XRCC1 and XPD polymorphisms and esophageal adenocarcinoma risk.

Authors:  Geoffrey Liu; Wei Zhou; Beow Y Yeap; Li Su; John C Wain; John M Poneros; Norman S Nishioka; Thomas J Lynch; David C Christiani
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 4.944

4.  Polymorphisms in MGMT and DNA repair genes and the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  James Doecke; Zhen Zhen Zhao; Nirmala Pandeya; Shahram Sadeghi; Mitchell Stark; Adèle C Green; Nicholas K Hayward; Penelope M Webb; David C Whiteman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  No association between hOGG1, XRCC1, and XPD polymorphisms and risk of reflux esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, or esophageal adenocarcinoma: results from the factors influencing the Barrett's adenocarcinoma relationship case-control study.

Authors:  Heather R Ferguson; Christopher P Wild; Lesley A Anderson; Seamus J Murphy; Brian T Johnston; Liam J Murray; R G Peter Watson; Jim McGuigan; John V Reynolds; Laura J Hardie
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  XRCC1 codon 280 and ERCC2 codon 751 polymorphisms and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Xian-Dun Zhai; Yao-Nan Mo; Xiao-Qi Xue; Gui-Sen Zhao; Lin-Bo Gao; Hong-Wei Ai; Yi Ye
Journal:  Bull Cancer       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.276

7.  Polymorphisms of the NER pathway genes, ERCC1 and XPD are associated with esophageal adenocarcinoma risk.

Authors:  Darren Tse; Rihong Zhai; Wei Zhou; Rebecca S Heist; Kofi Asomaning; Li Su; Thomas J Lynch; John C Wain; David C Christiani; Geoffrey Liu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Genetic susceptibility to esophageal cancer: the role of the nucleotide excision repair pathway.

Authors:  Jennifer Pan; Jie Lin; Julie G Izzo; Yang Liu; Jinliang Xing; Maosheng Huang; Jaffer A Ajani; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 9.  High-temperature beverages and foods and esophageal cancer risk--a systematic review.

Authors:  Farhad Islami; Paolo Boffetta; Jian-Song Ren; Leah Pedoeim; Dara Khatib; Farin Kamangar
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Tea drinking habits and oesophageal cancer in a high risk area in northern Iran: population based case-control study.

Authors:  Farhad Islami; Akram Pourshams; Dariush Nasrollahzadeh; Farin Kamangar; Saman Fahimi; Ramin Shakeri; Behnoush Abedi-Ardekani; Shahin Merat; Homayoon Vahedi; Shahryar Semnani; Christian C Abnet; Paul Brennan; Henrik Møller; Farrokh Saidi; Sanford M Dawsey; Reza Malekzadeh; Paolo Boffetta
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-03-26
View more
  6 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of xeroderma pigmentosum gene D Ls751Gln polymorphism and susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Yingren Zhao; Aiyun Zhang; Juan Ma; Zhenzhen Wang; Xu Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-10-01

Review 2.  Xeroderma Pigmentosum: Gene Variants and Splice Variants.

Authors:  Marie Christine Martens; Steffen Emmert; Lars Boeckmann
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.096

3.  Genetic risk of subsequent esophageal cancer in lymphoma and breast cancer long-term survival patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  E Boldrin; E Rumiato; M Fassan; M Rugge; M Cagol; D Marino; V Chiarion-Sileni; A Ruol; M Gusella; F Pasini; A Amadori; D Saggioro
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.550

4.  Genetic variants of DNA repair genes predict the survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer receiving platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Fei Zhou; Meiling Zhu; Mengyun Wang; Lixin Qiu; Lei Cheng; Ming Jia; Jiaqing Xiang; Qingyi Wei
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 5.531

5.  Association Between the Asp312Asn, Lys751Gln, and Arg156Arg Polymorphisms in XPD and the Risk of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Weijin Fu; Feifan Xiao; Ruoheng Zhang; Jiatong Li; Dong Zhao; Xuandong Lin; Yanzhen Xu; Xiaowei Song; Zhibin Xie; Qiongxian Wen; Xiaoli Yang
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-08-11

Review 6.  Association between the ERCC2 Asp312Asn polymorphism and risk of cancer.

Authors:  Feifan Xiao; Jian Pu; Qiongxian Wen; Qin Huang; Qinle Zhang; Birong Huang; Shanshan Huang; Aihua Lan; Yuening Zhang; Jiatong Li; Dong Zhao; Jing Shen; Huayu Wu; Yan He; Hongtao Li; Xiaoli Yang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.