| Literature DB >> 25468780 |
Huichao Fu1, Jiaxing Wang1, Wen Zhang1, Tao Cheng1, Xianlong Zhang1.
Abstract
The application of high-flex prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an area of continuing debate. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane database. 10 trials involving 1230 knee joints were eligible for our meta-analysis. No significant difference was observed between the two designs regarding postoperative range of flexion, clinical scores, quality of life outcomes, or complication rate. Moreover, the advantage of high-flex implants for patients with high preoperative range remained not statistically significant and high-flex design in NexGen system showed a marginal improvement in the postoperative range of flexion. Based on current findings, high-flex prosthesis did not appear to confer any benefit as compared to standard prosthesis.Entities:
Keywords: high flex; meta-analysis; posterior stabilized; range of flexion; total knee arthroplasty
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25468780 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Arthroplasty ISSN: 0883-5403 Impact factor: 4.757