Mara Buchbinder1, Rachel Wilbur2, Samuel McLean3, Betsy Sleath4. 1. Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA. Electronic address: mara.buchbinder@gmail.com. 2. Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA. 3. Departments of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA. 4. Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We examined the direct and indirect means by which patients express a desire for analgesic medication. METHODS: Back pain patients presenting to an academic ED were invited to participate in a study of patient-provider communication. Audio-recorded encounters were transcribed verbatim and transcripts analyzed using a qualitative approach based on conversation analysis. RESULTS: Requests for analgesics were documented in 15 out of 74 interactions (20%). We identified three basic patterns: direct requests, in which the patient explicitly asked for medication; indirect requests, in which the patient hinted at a desire for medication but did not ask for it outright; and no request, in which the provider discussed a prescription without the patient requesting it. CONCLUSION: Most patients did not request analgesics. When they did so, they utilized strategies of mitigation, indirection, and deference that presented themselves as deserving patients while upholding the physician's autonomy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Patients come to the clinical encounter with a variety of expectations, of which a desire for an analgesic may be only part of the picture. Rather than focusing on strategies for inuring providers to inappropriate patient requests, it may be useful to devote clinical resources to examining patients' priorities and expectations for treatment.
OBJECTIVE: We examined the direct and indirect means by which patients express a desire for analgesic medication. METHODS:Back painpatients presenting to an academic ED were invited to participate in a study of patient-provider communication. Audio-recorded encounters were transcribed verbatim and transcripts analyzed using a qualitative approach based on conversation analysis. RESULTS: Requests for analgesics were documented in 15 out of 74 interactions (20%). We identified three basic patterns: direct requests, in which the patient explicitly asked for medication; indirect requests, in which the patient hinted at a desire for medication but did not ask for it outright; and no request, in which the provider discussed a prescription without the patient requesting it. CONCLUSION: Most patients did not request analgesics. When they did so, they utilized strategies of mitigation, indirection, and deference that presented themselves as deserving patients while upholding the physician's autonomy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Patients come to the clinical encounter with a variety of expectations, of which a desire for an analgesic may be only part of the picture. Rather than focusing on strategies for inuring providers to inappropriate patient requests, it may be useful to devote clinical resources to examining patients' priorities and expectations for treatment.
Authors: Joseph O Merrill; Lorna A Rhodes; Richard A Deyo; G Alan Marlatt; Katharine A Bradley Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Marianne S Matthias; Erin E Krebs; Linda A Collins; Alicia A Bergman; Jessica Coffing; Matthew J Bair Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2013-08-02
Authors: Marianne S Matthias; Nicole L Johnson; Cleveland G Shields; Matthew J Bair; Palmer MacKie; Monica Huffman; Stewart C Alexander Journal: J Pain Date: 2017-07-08 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Louisa Chou; Tom A Ranger; Waruna Peiris; Flavia M Cicuttini; Donna M Urquhart; Kaye Sullivan; Maheeka Seneviwickrama; Andrew M Briggs; Anita E Wluka Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Vivien P Nichols; Francine Toye; Sam Eldabe; Harbinder Kaur Sandhu; Martin Underwood; Kate Seers Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-02-18 Impact factor: 2.692