Ying Wang1, Yanbin Jia2, Yigang Feng3, Shuming Zhong2, Yanping Xie3, Wensheng Wang3, Yufang Guan3, Dan Zhu3, Li Huang4. 1. Medical Imaging Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510630, China; Clinical Experimental Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510630, China. Electronic address: johneil@vip.sina.com. 2. Department of Psychiatry, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510630, China. 3. Medical Imaging Center, Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Guangzhou 510510, China. 4. Medical Imaging Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510630, China. Electronic address: cjr.huangli@vip.163.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder share common etiological factors and pathophysiological pathways and have overlapping clinical features. Only few studies have directly compared early auditory information processing in the two disorders. The objective of this study was to investigate the M100 and M200 auditory responses in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder and compare them with healthy controls using magnetoencephalography (MEG). METHODS: Whole-head MEG data were acquired during an auditory oddball paradigm in 24 schizophrenia patients, 26 bipolar I disorder patients, and 31 healthy controls. The strengths and latencies of M100 and M200 in both hemispheres and the dipole source localizations were investigated from the standard stimuli. RESULTS: The M100 and M200 dipolar sources were localized to the left and right posterior portion of the superior temporal gyrus (STG) in all the subjects. An asymmetric pattern of M100 and M200 auditory response with more anterior sources in the right STG was observed in the healthy controls. However, both the schizophrenia and bipolar disorder patients showed a symmetric M100 and M200 source pattern. When compared with the healthy control group, both patient groups showed significantly reduced M100 and M200 source strength in both hemispheres. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that early auditory information processing deficits may be similar in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder and may be related to abnormalities of the STG.
OBJECTIVES:Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder share common etiological factors and pathophysiological pathways and have overlapping clinical features. Only few studies have directly compared early auditory information processing in the two disorders. The objective of this study was to investigate the M100 and M200 auditory responses in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder and compare them with healthy controls using magnetoencephalography (MEG). METHODS: Whole-head MEG data were acquired during an auditory oddball paradigm in 24 schizophreniapatients, 26 bipolar I disorderpatients, and 31 healthy controls. The strengths and latencies of M100 and M200 in both hemispheres and the dipole source localizations were investigated from the standard stimuli. RESULTS: The M100 and M200 dipolar sources were localized to the left and right posterior portion of the superior temporal gyrus (STG) in all the subjects. An asymmetric pattern of M100 and M200 auditory response with more anterior sources in the right STG was observed in the healthy controls. However, both the schizophrenia and bipolar disorderpatients showed a symmetric M100 and M200 source pattern. When compared with the healthy control group, both patient groups showed significantly reduced M100 and M200 source strength in both hemispheres. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that early auditory information processing deficits may be similar in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder and may be related to abnormalities of the STG.
Authors: Luke Bloy; Matthew Ku; J Christopher Edgar; Judith S Miller; Lisa Blaskey; Judith Ross; Timothy P L Roberts Journal: Neuroreport Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 1.837
Authors: Hamid M Abdolmaleky; Adam C Gower; Chen-Khuan Wong; Jiayi W Cox; Xiaoling Zhang; Arunthathi Thiagalingam; Rahim Shafa; Vadivelu Sivaraman; Jin-Rong Zhou; Sam Thiagalingam Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2018-11-23 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: David A Parker; Jordan P Hamm; Jennifer E McDowell; Sarah K Keedy; Elliot S Gershon; Elena I Ivleva; Godfrey D Pearlson; Matcheri S Keshavan; Carol A Tamminga; John A Sweeney; Brett A Clementz Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Daniel Mamah; Jie Wen; Jie Luo; Xialing Ulrich; Deanna M Barch; Dmitriy Yablonskiy Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Collins Opoku-Baah; Adriana M Schoenhaut; Sarah G Vassall; David A Tovar; Ramnarayan Ramachandran; Mark T Wallace Journal: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Date: 2021-05-20