Literature DB >> 25467934

Outcomes of infected revision knee arthroplasty managed by two-stage revision in a tertiary referral centre.

John Stammers1, Steven Kahane2, Vijai Ranawat2, Jonathan Miles2, Rob Pollock2, Richard W J Carrington2, Timothy Briggs2, John A Skinner2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A two-stage revision remains the gold standard to eradicate deep infection in total knee arthroplasty. Higher failure rates are associated with a number of factors including poly-microbial infections, multiresistant organisms and previous operations. The aims are to investigate [1] the overall success rate of a two-stage revision for infections in TKA, [2] the outcome of repeat two-stage revisions in recurrent infections and [3] the factors affecting the outcomes of such cases.
METHODS: We present the outcomes of a consecutive, retrospective case series of 51 periprosthetic joint infections managed with a two-stage revision knee arthroplasty over a three year period.
RESULTS: Forty-six (90%) of 51 were referred from other hospitals. Infection was successfully eradicated in 24 (65%) of 37 patients undergoing an initial two-stage procedure. Following a failed two-stage revision, a repeat two-stage revision was performed in 19 patients eradicating infection in 8 (42%). A third two-stage was performed in five of these patients eradicating infection in three with an average follow-up of 43 months. Multidrug resistance was present in 69%, and 47% of the patients were infected with multiple organisms. All unsuccessful outcomes involved at least one multidrug-resistant organism compared to 43% in the successful cohort (P=0.0002). Serological markers prior to a second-stage procedure were not significantly different between successful and unsuccessful outcome groups.
CONCLUSION: Single or multiple two-stage revisions can eradicate infection despite previous failed attempts. In this series, failure is associated with multidrug resistance, previous failed attempts to eradicate infection and a less favourable host response.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Knee arthroplasty; Knee revision; Periprosthetic joint infection; Two-stage revision

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25467934     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  13 in total

1.  The use of spacers (static and mobile) in infection knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Luca Mazzucchelli; Federica Rosso; Antongiulio Marmotti; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Matteo Bruzzone; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

2.  The results of two-stage revision TKA using Ceftazidime-Vancomycin-impregnated cement articulating spacers in Tsukayama Type II periprosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Michael Drexler; Tim Dwyer; Paul R T Kuzyk; Yona Kosashvilli; Mansour Abolghasemian; Gilad J Regev; Assaf Kadar; Tal Frenkel Rutenberg; David Backstein
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Surgery Before Subspecialty Referral for Periprosthetic Knee Infection Reduces the Likelihood of Infection Control.

Authors:  Si Young Song; Stuart B Goodman; Gina Suh; Andrea K Finlay; James I Huddleston; William J Maloney; Derek F Amanatullah
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Sonication Culture of Antimicrobial Agent-Containing Cement Spacers Removed during Staged Revisions for Arthroplasty Infection.

Authors:  Eric Gomez-Urena; Rafael J Sierra; Kerryl E Greenwood-Quiantance; Melissa J Karau; James M Steckelberg; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Amputation as a Complication after Total Knee Replacement, is it a Real Concern to be Discussed?: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alireza Mousavian; Soheil Sabzevari; Shirin Ghiasi; Omid Shahpari; Amin Razi; Adel Ebrahimpour; Mohammad H Ebrahimzadeh
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2021-01

Review 6.  Classifications in Brief: The McPherson Classification of Periprosthetic Infection.

Authors:  Adam Coughlan; Fraser Taylor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty in cases of periprosthetic joint infection: an analysis of 50 cases.

Authors:  Leif Claassen; Christian Plaass; Kiriakos Daniilidis; Tilman Calliess; Gabriela von Lewinski
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2015-02-27

Review 8.  Salvage Procedures for Management of Prosthetic Joint Infection After Hip and Knee Replacements.

Authors:  Samer S S Mahmoud; Mohamed Sukeik; Sulaiman Alazzawi; Mohammed Shaath; Omar Sabri
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-11-30

9.  Sonication fluid culture of antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacer has high accuracy to confirm eradication of infection before reimplantation of new prostheses.

Authors:  Qingyu Zhang; Baocong Ding; Jinglin Wu; Jun Dong; Fanxiao Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-06-13       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Eradication rates, risk factors, and implant selection in two-stage revision knee arthroplasty: a mid-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Steffen Hoell; Anna Sieweke; Georg Gosheger; Jendrik Hardes; Ralf Dieckmann; Helmut Ahrens; Arne Streitbuerger
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.