Literature DB >> 25467904

PACS displays: how to select the right display technology.

David S Hirschorn1, Elizabeth A Krupinski2, Michael J Flynn3.   

Abstract

The medical imaging display is a precision instrument with many features not found in commercial-grade displays. The more one understands what these features are and their corresponding clinical value, the better one can make a purchase decision. None of these displays maintain themselves for 5 years or more without some degree of automatic or manual performance testing. Routine calibration conformance checks are beginning to be mandated by the departments of health of many states. Most manufacturers provide mechanisms to perform these checks and keep track of their results, some more easily than others. A consistent display brightness of about 400 cd/m(2) and close conformance to the DICOM curve are the key components of a successful check. Displays are typically characterized by the number of pixels they contain, usually 2, 3, or 5 megapixels, but this is the least useful determinant of image quality. What matters most is the size of the pixels and the size of the whole display, which should be selected on the basis of the typical viewing distance. The farther one's eyes are from the display, the larger the pixels and the overall display size can be while still feeding the eye as much information as it can see. Care should be taken to use the appropriate display in a given setting for the clinical purpose at hand.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  DICOM; Displays; calibration; grayscale; grayscale display function; luminance; monitor; pixel

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25467904     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  4 in total

Review 1.  Radiological interpretation of images displayed on tablet computers: a systematic review.

Authors:  L J Caffery; N R Armfield; A C Smith
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Diagnostic Accuracy and Visual Search Efficiency: Single 8 MP vs. Dual 5 MP Displays.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  The effect of time in use on the display performance of the iPad.

Authors:  Liam J Caffery; Kenneth L Manthey; Lawrence H Sim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Display Characteristics and Their Impact on Digital Pathology: A Current Review of Pathologists' Future "Microscope".

Authors:  Jacob T Abel; Peter Ouillette; Christopher L Williams; John Blau; Jerome Cheng; Keluo Yao; Winston Y Lee; Toby C Cornish; Ulysses G J Balis; David S McClintock
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2020-08-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.