Zoe Darwin1, Linda McGowan2, Leroy C Edozien3. 1. School of Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. Electronic address: z.j.darwin@leeds.ac.uk. 2. School of Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. 3. Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: to investigate (i) the consistency and completeness of mental health assessment documented at hospital booking; (ii) the subsequent management of pregnant women identified as experiencing, or at risk of, mental health problems; and (iii) women's experiences of the mental health referral process. DESIGN: mixed methods cohort study SETTING: large, inner-city hospital in the north of England PARTICIPANTS: women (n=191) booking at their first formal antenatal appointment; mean gestational age at booking 13 weeks. METHODS: women self-completed the routine mental health assessment in the clinical handheld maternity notes, followed by a research pack. Documentation of mental health assessment (including assessment of depression symptoms using the Whooley and Arroll questions, and mental health history), mental health referrals and their management were obtained from women's health records following birth. Longitudinal semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sub-sample of 22 women during and after pregnancy. FINDINGS: documentation of responses to the Whooley and Arroll questions was limited to the handheld notes and symptoms were not routinely monitored using these questions, even for women identified as possible cases of depression. The common focus of referrals was on the women's previous mental health history rather than current depression symptoms, assessed using the Whooley questions. Women referred to a Mental Health Specialist Midwife for further support were triaged based on the written referral and few met eligibility criteria. Although some women initially viewed the referral as offering a 'safety net', analysis of health records and subsequent interviews with women both indicated that communication regarding the management of referrals was inadequate and women tended not to hear back about the outcome of their referral. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: mental health assessment was introduced without ensuring that identified needs would be managed consistently. Care pathways and practices need to encompass identification, subsequent referral and management of mental ill-health, and ensure effective communication with patients and between health professionals.
OBJECTIVE: to investigate (i) the consistency and completeness of mental health assessment documented at hospital booking; (ii) the subsequent management of pregnant women identified as experiencing, or at risk of, mental health problems; and (iii) women's experiences of the mental health referral process. DESIGN: mixed methods cohort study SETTING: large, inner-city hospital in the north of England PARTICIPANTS: women (n=191) booking at their first formal antenatal appointment; mean gestational age at booking 13 weeks. METHODS:women self-completed the routine mental health assessment in the clinical handheld maternity notes, followed by a research pack. Documentation of mental health assessment (including assessment of depression symptoms using the Whooley and Arroll questions, and mental health history), mental health referrals and their management were obtained from women's health records following birth. Longitudinal semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sub-sample of 22 women during and after pregnancy. FINDINGS: documentation of responses to the Whooley and Arroll questions was limited to the handheld notes and symptoms were not routinely monitored using these questions, even for women identified as possible cases of depression. The common focus of referrals was on the women's previous mental health history rather than current depression symptoms, assessed using the Whooley questions. Women referred to a Mental Health Specialist Midwife for further support were triaged based on the written referral and few met eligibility criteria. Although some women initially viewed the referral as offering a 'safety net', analysis of health records and subsequent interviews with women both indicated that communication regarding the management of referrals was inadequate and women tended not to hear back about the outcome of their referral. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: mental health assessment was introduced without ensuring that identified needs would be managed consistently. Care pathways and practices need to encompass identification, subsequent referral and management of mental ill-health, and ensure effective communication with patients and between health professionals.
Authors: Stephanie L Prady; Kate E Pickett; Simon Gilbody; Emily S Petherick; Dan Mason; Trevor A Sheldon; John Wright Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2016-04-12 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Stephanie L Prady; Kate E Pickett; Tim Croudace; Dan Mason; Emily S Petherick; Rosie R C McEachan; Simon Gilbody; John Wright Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2015-09-28 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Selina Nath; Elizabeth G Ryan; Kylee Trevillion; Debra Bick; Jill Demilew; Jeannette Milgrom; Andrew Pickles; Louise M Howard Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 2.692