Literature DB >> 25467456

Determination of methylmercury in marine sediment samples: method validation and occurrence data.

Luis Carrasco1, Emilia Vassileva2.   

Abstract

The determination of methylmercury (MeHg) in sediment samples is a difficult task due to the extremely low MeHg/THg (total mercury) ratio and species interconversion. Here, we present the method validation of a cost-effective fit-for-purpose analytical procedure for the measurement of MeHg in sediments, which is based on aqueous phase ethylation, followed by purge and trap and hyphenated gas chromatography-pyrolysis-atomic fluorescence spectrometry (GC-Py-AFS) separation and detection. Four different extraction techniques, namely acid and alkaline leaching followed by solvent extraction and evaporation, microwave-assisted extraction with 2-mercaptoethanol, and acid leaching, solvent extraction and back extraction into sodium thiosulfate, were examined regarding their potential to selectively extract MeHg from estuarine sediment IAEA-405 certified reference material (CRM). The procedure based on acid leaching with HNO3/CuSO4, solvent extraction and back extraction into Na2S2O3 yielded the highest extraction recovery, i.e., 94±3% and offered the possibility to perform the extraction of a large number of samples in a short time, by eliminating the evaporation step. The artifact formation of MeHg was evaluated by high performance liquid chromatography coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (HPLC-ICP-MS), using isotopically enriched Me(201)Hg and (202)Hg and it was found to be nonexistent. A full validation approach in line with ISO 17025 and Eurachem guidelines was followed. With this in mind, blanks, selectivity, working range (1-800 pg), linearity (0.9995), recovery (94-96%), repeatability (3%), intermediate precision (4%), limit of detection (0.45 pg) and limit of quantification (0.85 pg) were systematically assessed with CRM IAEA-405. The uncertainty budget was calculated and the major contribution to the combined uncertainty (16.24%, k=2) was found to arise from the uncertainty associated with recovery (74.1%). Demonstration of traceability of measurement results is also presented. The validated measurement procedure was applied to the determination of MeHg incurred in sediments from a highly polluted and scarcely studied area in the Caribbean region.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gas chromatography–pyrolysis–atomic fluorescence spectrometry; Marine sediments; Methylmercury; Sample preparation; Traceability; Uncertainty; Validation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25467456     DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chim Acta        ISSN: 0003-2670            Impact factor:   6.558


  4 in total

1.  Speciation and quantification of Hg in sediments contaminated by artisanal gold mining in the Gualaxo do Norte River, Minas Gerais, SE, Brazil.

Authors:  Valdilene da Penha Rhodes; Jorge Carvalho de Lena; Camila Vidal Alves Santolin; Thais da Silva Pinto; Louise Aparecida Mendes; Cláudia Carvalhinho Windmöller
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Removal of inorganic mercury by selective extraction and coprecipitation for determination of methylmercury in mercury-contaminated soils by chemical vapor generation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (CVG-ICP-MS).

Authors:  Iris S Denmark; Ermira Begu; Zikri Arslan; Fengxiang X Han; Jennifer M Seiter-Moser; Eric M Pierce
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 6.558

3.  Methylmercury in Industrial Harbor Sediments in Taiwan: First Observations on its Occurrence, Distribution, and Measurement.

Authors:  Chih-Feng Chen; Yun-Ru Ju; Guan-Ting Lin; Chiu-Wen Chen; Cheng-Di Dong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Species-specific isotope dilution analysis of monomethylmercury in sediment using GC/ICP-ToF-MS and comparison with ICP-Q-MS and ICP-SF-MS.

Authors:  Sebastian Faßbender; Marcus von der Au; Maren Koenig; Jürgen Pelzer; Christian Piechotta; Jochen Vogl; Björn Meermann
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 4.142

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.