Literature DB >> 25465962

Density, ultrasound velocity, acoustic impedance, reflection and absorption coefficient determination of liquids via multiple reflection method.

S Hoche1, M A Hussein1, T Becker1.   

Abstract

The accuracy of density, reflection coefficient, and acoustic impedance determination via multiple reflection method was validated experimentally. The ternary system water-maltose-ethanol was used to execute a systematic, temperature dependent study over a wide range of densities and viscosities aiming an application as inline sensor in beverage industries. The validation results of the presented method and setup show root mean square errors of: 1.201E-3 g cm(-3) (±0.12%) density, 0.515E-3 (0.15%) reflection coefficient and 1.851E+3 kg s(-1) m(-2) (0.12%) specific acoustic impedance. The results of the diffraction corrected absorption showed an average standard deviation of only 0.12%. It was found that the absorption change shows a good correlation to concentration variations and may be useful for laboratory analysis of sufficiently pure liquids. The main part of the observed errors can be explained by the observed noise, temperature variation and the low signal resolution of 50 MHz. In particular, the poor signal-to-noise ratio of the second reflector echo was found to be a main accuracy limitation. Concerning the investigation of liquids the unstable properties of the reference material PMMA, due to hygroscopicity, were identified to be an additional, unpredictable source of uncertainty. While dimensional changes can be considered by adequate methodology, the impact of the time and temperature dependent water absorption on relevant reference properties like the buffer's sound velocity and density could not be considered and may explain part of the observed deviations.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Absorption; Density; Liquid properties; Multiple reflection method; Reflection coefficient

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25465962     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  5 in total

1.  Contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging by nature-inspired ultrastable echogenic nanobubbles.

Authors:  Al de Leon; Reshani Perera; Christopher Hernandez; Michaela Cooley; Olive Jung; Selva Jeganathan; Eric Abenojar; Grace Fishbein; Amin Jafari Sojahrood; Corey C Emerson; Phoebe L Stewart; Michael C Kolios; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 7.790

2.  Combined Longitudinal and Surface Acoustic Wave Analysis for Determining Small Filling Levels in Curved Steel Containers.

Authors:  Michael Metzenmacher; Alexander Beugholt; Dominik Geier; Thomas Becker
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Application of Ultrasound as Clean Technology for Extraction of Specialized Metabolites From Stinging Nettle (Urtica dioica L.).

Authors:  Jana Šic Žlabur; Sanja Radman; Nevena Opačić; Anamaria Rašić; Mia Dujmović; Mladen Brnčić; Francisco J Barba; Juan Manuel Castagnini; Sandra Voća
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-05-20

4.  Development of a battery-free ultrasonically powered functional electrical stimulator for movement restoration after paralyzing spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Monzurul Alam; Shuai Li; Rakib Uddin Ahmed; Yat Man Yam; Suman Thakur; Xiao-Yun Wang; Dan Tang; Serena Ng; Yong-Ping Zheng
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Ultrasonic Technique for Density Measurement of Liquids in Extreme Conditions.

Authors:  Rymantas Kazys; Reimondas Sliteris; Regina Rekuviene; Egidijus Zukauskas; Liudas Mazeika
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.