Literature DB >> 25465934

Relation of QRS duration to response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Biagio Sassone1, Simona Gambetti2, Matteo Bertini3, Matteo Beltrami4, Giosuè Mascioli5, Sabrina Bressan2, Giuseppe Fucà2, Federico Pacchioni2, Mario Pedaci2, Federica Michelotti5, Maria Letizia Bacchi Reggiani6, Luigi Padeletti4.   

Abstract

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is the most reliable electrocardiographic predictor of responsiveness to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, not all patients with LBBB will respond to CRT. Our aim was to investigate the interaction between QRS duration, LBBB-type morphology, and the responsiveness to CRT. We retrospectively analyzed electrocardiograms of 243 patients who underwent CRT implantation according to current clinical indications. A 6-month reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume >15% was used to identify CRT responders. The clinical end point consisted of death, hospitalization for heart failure and sustained rapid ventricular tachyarrhythmias. An LBBB morphology was present in 169 patients (70%) and 101 of these (60%) were responders to CRT. Analyzing the interaction between QRS duration and CRT responsiveness in patients with LBBB, a "U shaped" distribution resulted, with nonresponders clustered between 120 and 130 ms and above 180 ms. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 178 ms as the optimal cut-off value of QRS to predict a nonresponsiveness to CRT (area under the curve = 0.67 [95% confidence interval 0.57 to 0.76]). At multivariate analysis, only an ischemic cause and a QRS ≥178 ms were independent predictors of nonresponsiveness to CRT (area under the curve = 0.75). Patients with LBBB with QRS ≥178 ms had greater likelihood of adverse clinical events during a mean follow-up of 32 months (p = 0.049). In conclusion, in patients with LBBB undergoing CRT, a marked QRS widening (i.e., ≥178 ms) is related to worse echocardiographic responsiveness and lower event free survival rate compared with patients with an intermediate QRS widening.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25465934     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.10.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

1.  Novel measure of electrical dyssynchrony predicts response in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Results from the SMART-AV Trial.

Authors:  Larisa G Tereshchenko; Alan Cheng; Jason Park; Nicholas Wold; Timothy E Meyer; Michael R Gold; Suneet Mittal; Jagmeet Singh; Kenneth M Stein; Kenneth A Ellenbogen
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  Influence of QRS duration and axis on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in chronic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: A single center study including patients with left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Tomasz Fabiszak; Piotr Łach; Jakub Ratajczak; Marek Koziński; Wojciech Krupa; Jacek Kubica
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 3.  Electrical manipulation of the failing heart.

Authors:  Valerio Zacà; Theodore Murphy; Mauro Biffi
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  Predictors of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation in patients with class I indications: the markedly dilated left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and the presence of fragmented QRS.

Authors:  Yi-Ran Hu; Wei Hua; Sheng-Wen Yang; Min Gu; Hong-Xia Niu; Li-Gang Ding; Jing Wang; Ran Jing; Xiao-Han Fan; Shu Zhang
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.327

5.  Correlation between Myocardial Velocity Measured using Tissue Doppler Imaging in the Left Ventricular Lead-Implanted Segment and Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Dong-Mei Yang; Fei Yu; Kang-Yu Chen; Hao Su; Qi Wang; Zhi-Quan Liu; Kai Hu; Jian Xu; Ji Yan
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  Left ventricular global longitudinal strain in predicting CRT response: one more J-shaped curve in medicine.

Authors:  Michal Orszulak; Artur Filipecki; Wojciech Wrobel; Adrianna Berger-Kucza; Witold Orszulak; Dagmara Urbanczyk-Swic; Wojciech Kwasniewski; Katarzyna Mizia-Stec
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Comparison of triple-site ventricular pacing versus conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with systolic heart failure: A meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies.

Authors:  Baowei Zhang; Junfang Guo; Guohui Zhang
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2017-12-21

8.  Circulating metabolite profiles to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Xue Gong; Zhonghan Sun; Zheyong Huang; Qian Zhou; Ziqing Yu; Xueying Chen; Wenqi Shao; Yan Zheng; Yixiu Liang; Shengmei Qin; Yangang Su; Junbo Ge
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.298

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.