Literature DB >> 25465811

Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kevin Phan1, Sophia Wong2, Nelson Wang3, Steven Phan3, Tristan D Yan4.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Bypass graft; Hybrid coronary revascularization; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Systematic review

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25465811     DOI： 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.11.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN： 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

Review 1.  Minimally Invasive Multivessel Coronary Surgery and Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: Can We Routinely Achieve Less Invasive Coronary Surgery?

Authors:  Maria Rodriguez; Marc Ruel
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

Review 2.  Hybrid coronary revascularization versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander C Reynolds; Nicola King
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Hybrid coronary revascularization vs. percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Edward L Hannan; Yi-Feng Wu; Kimberly Cozzens; Jacqueline Tamis-Holland; Frederick S K Ling; Alice K Jacobs; Ferdinand J Venditti; Peter B Berger; Gary Walford; Spencer B King Iii
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 4.  Clinical Outcomes of Revascularization Strategies for Patients With MVD/LMCA Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Meng-Kan Fan; Ya-Min Su; Xing-Xing Cai; Zhou-Shan Gu; Hai-Hua Geng; Hai-Yan Pan; Jian-Hua Zhu; Min Pan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.