Literature DB >> 25465630

Effects of dietary starch content and rate of fermentation on methane production in lactating dairy cows.

B Hatew1, S C Podesta2, H Van Laar3, W F Pellikaan2, J L Ellis4, J Dijkstra2, A Bannink5.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of starch varying in rate of fermentation and level of inclusion in the diet in exchange for fiber on methane (CH4) production of dairy cows. Forty Holstein-Friesian lactating dairy cows of which 16 were rumen cannulated were grouped in 10 blocks of 4 cows each. Cows received diets consisting of 60% grass silage and 40% concentrate (dry matter basis). Cows within block were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 different diets composed of concentrates that varied in rate of starch fermentation [slowly (S) vs. rapidly (R) rumen fermentable; native vs. gelatinized corn grain] and level of starch (low vs. high; 270 vs. 530g/kg of concentrate dry matter). Results of rumen in situ incubations confirmed that the fractional rate of degradation of starch was higher for R than S starch. Effective rumen degradability of organic matter was higher for high than low starch and also higher for R than S starch. Increased level of starch, but not starch fermentability, decreased dry matter intake and daily CH4 production. Milk yield (mean 24.0±1.02kg/d), milk fat content (mean 5.05±0.16%), and milk protein content (mean 3.64±0.05%) did not differ between diets. Methane expressed per kilogram of fat- and protein-corrected milk, per kilogram of dry matter intake, or as a fraction of gross energy intake did not differ between diets. Methane expressed per kilogram of estimated rumen-fermentable organic matter (eRFOM) was higher for S than R starch-based diets (47.4 vs. 42.6g/kg of eRFOM) and for low than high starch-based diets (46.9 vs. 43.1g/kg of eRFOM). Apparent total-tract digestibility of neutral detergent fiber and crude protein were not affected by diets, but starch digestibility was higher for diets based on R starch (97.2%) compared with S starch (95.5%). Both total volatile fatty acid concentration (109.2 vs. 97.5mM) and propionate proportion (16.5 vs. 15.8mol/100mol) were higher for R starch- compared with S starch-based diets but unaffected by the level of starch. Total N excretion in feces plus urine and N retained were unaffected by dietary treatments, and similarly energy intake and output of energy in milk expressed per unit of metabolic body weight were not affected by treatments. In conclusion, an increased rate of starch fermentation and increased level of starch in the diet of dairy cattle reduced CH4 produced per unit of eRFOM but did not affect CH4 production per unit of feed dry matter intake or per unit of milk produced.
Copyright © 2015 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dairy cow; methane; starch fermentability; starch level

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25465630     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-8427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  12 in total

1.  Effects of calcium salts of palm oil inclusion and ad libitum feeding regimen on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and plasma glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide concentration of feedlot steers.

Authors:  Alejandro M Pittaluga; Mairim Y Ortiz-Fraguada; Anthony Joseph Parker; Alejandro E Relling
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.338

2.  Meta-analysis of the effects of the dietary application of exogenous alpha-amylase preparations on performance, nutrient digestibility, and rumen fermentation of lactating dairy cows.

Authors:  Andres A Pech-Cervantes; Luiz F Ferrarretto; Ibukun M Ogunade
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.338

Review 3.  A Review: Plant Carbohydrate Types-The Potential Impact on Ruminant Methane Emissions.

Authors:  Xuezhao Sun; Long Cheng; Arjan Jonker; Sineka Munidasa; David Pacheco
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-17

4.  Thermodynamic Driving Force of Hydrogen on Rumen Microbial Metabolism: A Theoretical Investigation.

Authors:  Henk J van Lingen; Caroline M Plugge; James G Fadel; Ermias Kebreab; André Bannink; Jan Dijkstra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Diurnal Dynamics of Gaseous and Dissolved Metabolites and Microbiota Composition in the Bovine Rumen.

Authors:  Henk J van Lingen; Joan E Edwards; Jueeli D Vaidya; Sanne van Gastelen; Edoardo Saccenti; Bartholomeus van den Bogert; André Bannink; Hauke Smidt; Caroline M Plugge; Jan Dijkstra
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  Review: Sugar beets as a substitute for grain for lactating dairy cattle.

Authors:  Essi Evans; Ulrike Messerschmidt
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-03-01

7.  Effects of Starch Level and a Mixture of Sunflower and Fish Oils on Nutrient Intake and Digestibility, Rumen Fermentation, and Ruminal Methane Emissions in Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Babak Darabighane; Ilma Tapio; Laura Ventto; Piia Kairenius; Tomasz Stefański; Heidi Leskinen; Kevin J Shingfield; Johanna Vilkki; Ali-Reza Bayat
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Effects of ruminally degradable starch levels on performance, nitrogen balance, and nutrient digestibility in dairy cows fed low corn-based starch diets.

Authors:  Guobin Luo; Wenbin Xu; Jinshan Yang; Yang Li; Liyang Zhang; Yizhen Wang; Cong Lin; Yonggen Zhang
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 2.509

9.  Volatile Fatty Acids in Ruminal Fluid Can Be Used to Predict Methane Yield of Dairy Cows.

Authors:  S Richard O Williams; Murray C Hannah; Joe L Jacobs; William J Wales; Peter J Moate
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Nutritional Quality, Voluntary Intake and Enteric Methane Emissions of Diets Based on Novel Cayman Grass and Its Associations With Two Leucaena Shrub Legumes.

Authors:  Xiomara Gaviria-Uribe; Diana M Bolivar; Todd S Rosenstock; Isabel Cristina Molina-Botero; Ngonidzashe Chirinda; Rolando Barahona; Jacobo Arango
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-10-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.