Literature DB >> 25465377

Success Factors of Laparoscopic Nerve-sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Preserving Bladder Function in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Protocol-Based Prospective Cohort Study.

Hee Seung Kim1, Tae Hun Kim, Dong Hoon Suh, Sang Youn Kim, Min A Kim, Chang Wook Jeong, Kyoung Sup Hong, Yong Sang Song.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Success factors of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (LNRH) to preserve bladder function are little known despite its widespread use. Thus, we conducted a protocol-based prospective cohort study to evaluate clinicopathologic factors for preserving autonomic nerves and its impact on duration of postoperative catheterization (DPC).
METHODS: From 2012 to 2014, 30 patients with stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer were recruited prospectively to undergo LNRH. All procedures were performed on the left side of the patients by one gynecologic oncologist. Extent of resection and preservation of autonomic nerves were documented in the protocol during LNRH.
RESULTS: All patients received laparoscopic type C1 radical hysterectomy, where extent of resection and preservation of autonomic nerves were not different between the right and left sides. Stage IB1 disease was associated with the reduced risk of injury of the left junctions between the hypogastric and the splanchnic nerves; between the splanchnic nerve and the vesical branch of the pelvic plexus (S-V junction) (adjusted odds ratios, 0.06 and 0.06; 95 % confidence intervals, 0.01-0.92 and 0.01-0.48); the right S-V junction with marginal significance (adjusted odds ratio, 0.18; 95 % confidence interval, 0.03-1.06). Furthermore, bilateral preservation of autonomic nerves decreased DPC significantly when compared with failure or unilateral preservation (median, 6 days vs. 34 days or 57 days; P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: LNRH has a higher likelihood of its success in stage IB1 than in stage IB2 to IIA disease. Moreover, preservation of bilateral autonomic nerves reduces DPC significantly in comparison with failure or unilateral preservation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25465377     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4197-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  5 in total

Review 1.  Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa).

Authors:  Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Apiwat Aue-Aungkul; Khadra Galaal; Chetta Ngamjarus; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-12

2.  Impaired contraction and decreased detrusor innervation in a female rat model of pelvic neuropraxia.

Authors:  Johanna L Hannan; Shelby A Powers; Vinson M Wang; Fabio Castiglione; Petter Hedlund; Trinity J Bivalacqua
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  An improved nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique for cervical cancer using the paravesico-vaginal space as a new surgical landmark.

Authors:  Yuqin Zhang; Tingyan Shi; Sheng Yin; Sining Ma; Di Shi; Jun Guan; Libing Xiang; Yang Liu; Yulan Ren; Deyan Tan; Rongyu Zang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-05

4.  Limited energy parametrial resection/dissection during modified laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Dan Zhao; Bin Li; Yating Wang; Shuanghuan Liu; Yanan Zhang; Gongyi Zhang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Surgical, Urinary, and Survival Outcomes of Nerve-sparing Versus Traditional Radical Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study in China.

Authors:  Lei Li; Shuiqing Ma; Xianjie Tan; Sen Zhong; Ming Wu
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.339

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.