Literature DB >> 25464361

Characterization of proteins in soybean roots under flooding and drought stresses.

MyeongWon Oh1, Setsuko Komatsu2.   

Abstract

Flooding and drought affect soybean growth because soybean is a stress-sensitive crop. In 2-day-old plants exposed to 2-day flooding or drought, the fresh weight of roots was markedly suppressed, although the root morphology clearly differed between two conditions. To understand the response mechanisms of soybean to flooding and drought stresses, a gel-free proteomic technique was used. A total of 97 and 48 proteins were significantly changed in response to flooding and drought stresses, respectively. Proteins involved in protein synthesis were decreased by flooding stress and increased by drought. Glycolysis-related proteins were increased in roots by both flooding and drought stresses. Fermentation, stress, and cell wall-related proteins were increased in response to flooding stress, whereas cell organization and redox-related proteins were increased under drought stress. Among the identified proteins, three S-adenosylmethionine synthetases were commonly decreased and increased in response to flooding and drought stresses, respectively. The mRNA expression levels of S-adenosylmethionine synthetase genes displayed a similar tendency to the changes in protein abundance. These results suggest that S-adenosylmethionine synthetase is involved in the regulation of stress response because it was changed in response to flooding and drought stresses. BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study reported on the response mechanisms of soybean to flooding and drought stresses using the gel-free proteomic technique. Proteins involved in protein synthesis were decreased by flooding stress and increased by drought. Glycolysis-related proteins were increased in roots by both flooding and drought stresses. Fermentation, stress, and cell wall-related proteins were increased in response to flooding stress, whereas cell organization and redox-related proteins were increased under drought stress. Among the identified proteins, three S-adenosylmethionine synthetases were commonly decreased and increased in response to flooding and drought stresses, respectively. The mRNA expression levels of S-adenosylmethionine synthetase genes displayed a similar tendency to the changes in protein abundance. These results suggest that S-adenosylmethionine synthetase is involved in the regulation of stress response because it was changed in response to flooding and drought stresses.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drought stress; Flooding stress; Proteomics; Root; Soybean

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25464361     DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteomics        ISSN: 1874-3919            Impact factor:   4.044


  17 in total

1.  Comparative physiological and leaf proteome analysis between drought-tolerant chickpea Cicer reticulatum and drought-sensitive chickpea C. arietinum.

Authors:  Sertan Cevik; Gurler Akpinar; Aytunc Yildizli; Murat Kasap; Kubra Karaosmanoglu; Serpil Unyayar
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Prioritization and Evaluation of Flooding Tolerance Genes in Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.].

Authors:  Mu-Chien Lai; Zheng-Yuan Lai; Li-Hsin Jhan; Ya-Syuan Lai; Chung-Feng Kao
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Proteomic profiling analysis reveals that glutathione system plays important roles responding to osmotic stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) roots.

Authors:  Jianhui Ma; Wen Dong; Daijing Zhang; Xiaolong Gao; Lina Jiang; Yun Shao; Doudou Tong; Chunxi Li
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Identification and Comparative Analysis of Differential Gene Expression in Soybean Leaf Tissue under Drought and Flooding Stress Revealed by RNA-Seq.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Qiuming Yao; Gunvant B Patil; Gaurav Agarwal; Rupesh K Deshmukh; Li Lin; Biao Wang; Yongqin Wang; Silvas J Prince; Li Song; Dong Xu; Yongqiang C An; Babu Valliyodan; Rajeev K Varshney; Henry T Nguyen
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Identification of functionally important microRNAs from rice inflorescence at heading stage of a qDTY4.1-QTL bearing Near Isogenic Line under drought conditions.

Authors:  Boon Huat Cheah; Sudhir Jadhao; Madavan Vasudevan; Ratnam Wickneswari; Kalaivani Nadarajah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Elucidation of the molecular responses to waterlogging in Sesbania cannabina roots by transcriptome profiling.

Authors:  Cheng-Gang Ren; Cun-Cui Kong; Kun Yan; Hua Zhang; Yong-Ming Luo; Zhi-Hong Xie
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  2-DE proteomics analysis of drought treated seedlings of Quercus ilex supports a root active strategy for metabolic adaptation in response to water shortage.

Authors:  Lyudmila P Simova-Stoilova; Maria C Romero-Rodríguez; Rosa Sánchez-Lucas; Rafael M Navarro-Cerrillo; J Alberto Medina-Aunon; Jesús V Jorrín-Novo
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Differential root transcriptomics in a polyploid non-model crop: the importance of respiration during osmotic stress.

Authors:  Yasmín Zorrilla-Fontanesi; Mathieu Rouard; Alberto Cenci; Ewaut Kissel; Hien Do; Emeric Dubois; Sabine Nidelet; Nicolas Roux; Rony Swennen; Sebastien Christian Carpentier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Biological Networks Underlying Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Temperate Crops--A Proteomic Perspective.

Authors:  Klára Kosová; Pavel Vítámvás; Milan Oldřich Urban; Miroslav Klíma; Amitava Roy; Ilja Tom Prášil
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Drought Stress Responses in Soybean Roots and Nodules.

Authors:  Karl J Kunert; Barend J Vorster; Berhanu A Fenta; Tsholofelo Kibido; Giuseppe Dionisio; Christine H Foyer
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.