Literature DB >> 25464283

Abiotic reductive extraction of arsenic from contaminated soils enhanced by complexation: arsenic extraction by reducing agents and combination of reducing and chelating agents.

Eun Jung Kim1, Jae-Cheol Lee2, Kitae Baek3.   

Abstract

Abiotic reductive extraction of arsenic from contaminated soils was studied with various reducing agents and combinations of reducing and chelating agents in order to remediate arsenic-contaminated soils. Oxalate and ascorbic acid were effective to extract arsenic from soil in which arsenic was associated with amorphous iron oxides, but they were not effective to extract arsenic from soils in which arsenic was bound to crystalline oxides or those in which arsenic was mainly present as a scorodite phase. An X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study showed that iron oxides present in soils were transformed to Fe(II,III) or Fe(II) oxide forms such as magnetite (Fe3O4, Fe(II)Fe2(III)O4) by reduction with dithionite. Thus, arsenic extraction by dithionite was not effective due to the re-adsorption of arsenic to the newly formed iron oxide phase. Combination of chelating agents with reducing agents greatly improved arsenic extraction from soil samples. About 90% of the total arsenic could be extracted from all soil samples by using a combination of dithionite and EDTA. Chelating agents form strong complexation with iron, which can prevent precipitation of a new iron oxide phase and also enhance iron oxide dissolution via a non-reductive dissolution pathway.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arsenic; Chelating agent; Reducing agent; Reductive extraction; Soil

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25464283     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.09.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hazard Mater        ISSN: 0304-3894            Impact factor:   10.588


  7 in total

1.  Enhanced remediation of arsenic and chromium co-contaminated soil by eletrokinetic-permeable reactive barriers with different reagents.

Authors:  Yunfeng Xu; Jiangpeng Li; Wei Xia; Ying Sun; Guangren Qian; Jia Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Soil moisture could enhance electrokinetic remediation of arsenic-contaminated soil.

Authors:  Su-Yeon Shin; Sang-Min Park; Kitae Baek
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Dynamic leaching behavior of geogenic As in soils after cement-based stabilization/solidification.

Authors:  Jiang-Shan Li; Lei Wang; Daniel C W Tsang; Jingzi Beiyuan; Chi Sun Poon
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Using poly-glutamic acid as soil-washing agent to remediate heavy metal-contaminated soils.

Authors:  Zong-Han Yang; Cheng-Di Dong; Chiu-Wen Chen; Yih-Terng Sheu; Chih-Ming Kao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Influence of multi-step washing using Na2EDTA, oxalic acid and phosphoric acid on metal fractionation and spectroscopy characteristics from contaminated soil.

Authors:  Meng Wei; Jiajun Chen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Arsenic mobilization from iron oxides in the presence of oxalic acid under hydrodynamic conditions.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Benjamin C Bostick; Brian J Mailloux; James Jamieson; Beizhan Yan; Masha Pitiranggon; Steven N Chillrud
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 7.086

7.  Effect of oxalic acid treatment on sediment arsenic concentrations and lability under reducing conditions.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Benjamin C Bostick; Brian J Mailloux; James M Ross; Steven N Chillrud
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 10.588

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.