Literature DB >> 25464159

Assessing clinically meaningful treatment effects in controlled trials: chronic migraine as an example.

David W Dodick1, Catherine C Turkel2, Ronald E DeGryse2, Hans-Christoph Diener3, Richard B Lipton4, Sheena K Aurora5, Marissa E Nolan6, Stephen D Silberstein7.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In addition to headache, persons with chronic migraine (CM) experience multiple symptoms, both ictal and interictal, that may contribute to their suffering. Translating clinical trial results into practice requires assessment of the results' clinical meaningfulness. When examining treatment benefit in this disabled patient population, multiple headache-symptom measures should be considered to fully reflect clinical relevance. Currently, only onabotulinumtoxinA is approved specifically for headache prophylaxis in adults with CM. Topiramate is the only other therapeutic agent with double-blind, placebo-controlled evidence in this population. Herein we evaluate the clinical meaningfulness of onabotulinumtoxinA and topiramate as headache prophylaxis in CM by comparing primary endpoints from the placebo-controlled, double-blind phase of the Phase 3 REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy (PREEMPT) clinical program and the topiramate clinical trial (frequency of headache days [primary endpoint in PREEMPT; secondary in topiramate trial] and migraine/migrainous days [primary in topiramate trial, or "migraine/probable-migraine days"; secondary in PREEMPT]). Additionally, outcome measures such as responder rates, health-related quality of life, discontinuation rates, safety, and tolerability profiles are important clinical considerations. The clinical data indicate that statistically significant, clinically relevant treatment benefits exist for both onabotulinumtoxinA and topiramate. These data support these treatments as meaningful headache prophylaxis in adults with CM. PERSPECTIVE: CM is a chronic pain condition. We sought to determine the clinical relevance of recent trials in this disabled population. Clinical data indicate that statistically significant, clinically relevant treatment benefits exist for both onabotulinumtoxinA and topiramate, and support use of these treatments as meaningful headache prophylaxis in CM.
Copyright © 2015 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic migraine; clinical meaningfulness; onabotulinumtoxinA; prophylactic treatment; topiramate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25464159     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  18 in total

1.  Evaluation of Galcanezumab for the Prevention of Episodic Migraine: The EVOLVE-1 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Virginia L Stauffer; David W Dodick; Qi Zhang; Jeffrey N Carter; Jessica Ailani; Robert R Conley
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 18.302

Review 2.  [Effectiveness of physiotherapeutic treatment interventions on pain intensity, duration, frequency, and quality of life of patients with migraine : A systematic review].

Authors:  Andres Jung; Robert-Christopher Eschke; Tom Gabler; Vera Pawlowsky; Kerstin Luedtke
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 1.629

Review 3.  Similarities and Differences Between Migraine in Children and Adults: Presentation, Disability, and Response to Treatment.

Authors:  Ashley M Kroon Van Diest; Michelle M Ernst; Shalonda Slater; Scott W Powers
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2017-10-25

Review 4.  Treatment of Chronic Migraine with OnabotulinumtoxinA: Mode of Action, Efficacy and Safety.

Authors:  Délia Szok; Anett Csáti; László Vécsei; János Tajti
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 5.  OnabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of patients with chronic migraine: clinical evidence and experience.

Authors:  Chia-Chun Chiang; Amaal J Starling
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 6.570

Review 6.  Mechanism of Action of OnabotulinumtoxinA in Chronic Migraine: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Rami Burstein; Andrew M Blumenfeld; Stephen D Silberstein; Aubrey Manack Adams; Mitchell F Brin
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 5.887

7.  A phase 3, long-term, open-label safety study of Galcanezumab in patients with migraine.

Authors:  Angelo Camporeale; David Kudrow; Ryan Sides; Shufang Wang; Annelies Van Dycke; Katherine J Selzler; Virginia L Stauffer
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.474

8.  Fremanezumab for preventive treatment of migraine: Functional status on headache-free days.

Authors:  Juliana VanderPluym; David W Dodick; Richard B Lipton; Yuju Ma; Pippa S Loupe; Marcelo E Bigal
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation (nVNS) as mini-prophylaxis for menstrual/menstrually related migraine: an open-label study.

Authors:  Licia Grazzi; Gabriella Egeo; Anne H Calhoun; Candace K McClure; Eric Liebler; Piero Barbanti
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 7.277

10.  Galcanezumab in chronic migraine: The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study.

Authors:  Holland C Detke; Peter J Goadsby; Shufang Wang; Deborah I Friedman; Katherine J Selzler; Sheena K Aurora
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 9.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.