Literature DB >> 25463458

Lateralization for dynamic facial expressions in human superior temporal sulcus.

François-Laurent De Winter1, Qi Zhu2, Jan Van den Stock3, Koen Nelissen2, Ronald Peeters4, Beatrice de Gelder5, Wim Vanduffel6, Mathieu Vandenbulcke3.   

Abstract

Most face processing studies in humans show stronger activation in the right compared to the left hemisphere. Evidence is largely based on studies with static stimuli focusing on the fusiform face area (FFA). Hence, the pattern of lateralization for dynamic faces is less clear. Furthermore, it is unclear whether this property is common to human and non-human primates due to predisposing processing strategies in the right hemisphere or that alternatively left sided specialization for language in humans could be the driving force behind this phenomenon. We aimed to address both issues by studying lateralization for dynamic facial expressions in monkeys and humans. Therefore, we conducted an event-related fMRI experiment in three macaques and twenty right handed humans. We presented human and monkey dynamic facial expressions (chewing and fear) as well as scrambled versions to both species. We studied lateralization in independently defined face-responsive and face-selective regions by calculating a weighted lateralization index (LIwm) using a bootstrapping method. In order to examine if lateralization in humans is related to language, we performed a separate fMRI experiment in ten human volunteers including a 'speech' expression (one syllable non-word) and its scrambled version. Both within face-responsive and selective regions, we found consistent lateralization for dynamic faces (chewing and fear) versus scrambled versions in the right human posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), but not in FFA nor in ventral temporal cortex. Conversely, in monkeys no consistent pattern of lateralization for dynamic facial expressions was observed. Finally, LIwms based on the contrast between different types of dynamic facial expressions (relative to scrambled versions) revealed left-sided lateralization in human pSTS for speech-related expressions compared to chewing and emotional expressions. To conclude, we found consistent laterality effects in human posterior STS but not in visual cortex of monkeys. Based on our results, it is tempting to speculate that lateralization for dynamic face processing in humans may be driven by left-hemispheric language specialization which may not have been present yet in the common ancestor of human and macaque monkeys.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparative; Dynamic facial expressions; Lateralization; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25463458     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  24 in total

1.  Left-Right Axis Differentiation and Functional Lateralization: a Haplotype in the Methyltransferase Encoding Gene SETDB2 Might Mediate Handedness in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Sebastian Ocklenburg; Larissa Arning; Wanda M Gerding; Jan G Hengstler; Jörg T Epplen; Onur Güntürkün; Christian Beste; Denis A Akkad
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 5.590

2.  Widespread and lateralized social brain activity for processing dynamic facial expressions.

Authors:  Wataru Sato; Takanori Kochiyama; Shota Uono; Reiko Sawada; Yasutaka Kubota; Sayaka Yoshimura; Motomi Toichi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Rostro-caudal organization of the human posterior superior temporal sulcus revealed by connectivity profiles.

Authors:  Chen Cheng; Lingzhong Fan; Xiaoluan Xia; Simon B Eickhoff; Hai Li; Haifang Li; Junjie Chen; Tianzi Jiang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  The dot-probe task to measure emotional attention: A suitable measure in comparative studies?

Authors:  Rianne van Rooijen; Annemie Ploeger; Mariska E Kret
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

Review 5.  Emotion Perception from Face, Voice, and Touch: Comparisons and Convergence.

Authors:  Annett Schirmer; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Perception drives production across sensory modalities: A network for sensorimotor integration of visual speech.

Authors:  Jonathan H Venezia; Paul Fillmore; William Matchin; A Lisette Isenberg; Gregory Hickok; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  TRACE: A Topological Graph Representation for Automatic Sulcal Curve Extraction.

Authors:  Ilwoo Lyu; Sun Hyung Kim; Neil D Woodward; Martin A Styner; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Temporal lobe epilepsy alters neural responses to human and avatar facial expressions in the face perception network.

Authors:  Lorena Chantal Kegel; Sascha Frühholz; Thomas Grunwald; Dieter Mersch; Anton Rey; Hennric Jokeit
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.708

9.  Emotion recognition impairments and social well-being following right-hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  Katherine O'Connell; Abigail A Marsh; Dorothy Farrar Edwards; Alexander W Dromerick; Anna Seydell-Greenwald
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 2.928

10.  Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Recognition of Bodily Emotions from Point-Light Displays.

Authors:  Sharona Vonck; Stephan Patrick Swinnen; Nicole Wenderoth; Kaat Alaerts
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.